1 / 30

DRAMA MODERATION PROTOCOL

DRAMA MODERATION PROTOCOL. FET Drama. Introduction. Circular 128/2002 Protocol to take effect 2003 UMALUSI tasked with quality assuring provision of education. Umalusi. Replaces former SAFCERT To quality assure the GET and FET assessment processes for certification

brettg
Télécharger la présentation

DRAMA MODERATION PROTOCOL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DRAMA MODERATION PROTOCOL FET Drama

  2. Introduction • Circular 128/2002 • Protocol to take effect 2003 • UMALUSI tasked with quality assuring provision of education

  3. Umalusi • Replaces former SAFCERT • To quality assure the GET and FET assessment processes for certification • To ensure same standard of assessment across different examining bodies

  4. Moderation policy for WCED • Province has to quality assure assessment of learners for progression, promotion or qualifications

  5. Main functions of moderation system • Verify that assessment is: • Fair • Valid • Reliable • Consistent Practicable

  6. To ensure that learners within same LA/Subject are treated equitably • Validate authenticity of learners work • To identify the need to redesign the assessment

  7. To provide for an appeal procedure for learners • To provide support, advice and guidance to assessors

  8. Moderation methods • Face moderation e.g. for practical work, products • Cluster Moderation

  9. Cluster moderation • Time-effective • Human resource effective

  10. Why cluster moderation? • Mechanism to develop human resources • To set standards • Stimulates collegiality • Create shared understanding of standards and assessment requirements in a collegial environment

  11. Evidence required for moderation Dramatic Arts : 1. Educator File. See Cover pages 2. Learner Assessment Evidence. See Cover pages

  12. Moderators • Senior Education Specialist • Educators • Within schools: subject heads

  13. Types of moderation • INTERNAL • To ensure school based assessment is consistent, accurate and well designed • EXTERNAL • To validate school based assessment

  14. Functions of Internal moderation • Verify assessment is fair • Ensure learners in same subject in different classes are treated equitably • Validate authenticity • Ensure school-based assessment is continuous

  15. Criteria for internal moderation • Assessment and moderation criteria for each subject • All educators in subject are involved

  16. Functions of external moderation • To verify assessment is fair across schools • To ensure learners in same subject but in different schools are treated equitably • To validate authenticity • To identify the need to redesign assessments

  17. Moderation sample • Generally a 10% sample • (Up to 15%)

  18. Cluster moderation • Educators come together with Educator- and Learner assessment Evidence files • Moderation is based on group evaluation and discussion • On a consensus basis or a weighted system of scoring

  19. Cluster meetings conducted by senior education specialist • Head Office will set official clusters • Regular meeting during year to discuss details regarding procedures in the subject

  20. External face moderation • Practical work • All candidates in Dramatic Arts

  21. Adjustment of marks • After scrutiny and discussion: • If average difference between marks allocated by the school and by the moderation panel is greater than 10% Then: • the marks of all candidates are adjusted up or down according to the average difference

  22. Irregularities • Candidates who fail to hand in work • School to inform parents • Work still not submitted give ‘incomplete’ - indicate that follow up action was taken • Keep record of interventions in Educator File

  23. If candidate does not hand in any SBA give “incomplete” • Candidate can re-enter the following year • If learner hands in work not worth marks give ZERO • No SBA, for medical reasons, mark absent,SBA calculated out of lower mark

  24. SBA appeal • LEARNERS • To HOD • To Senior Education Specialist • SCHOOLS • To CCA within 5 days • Will appoint another specialist to re-assess

  25. Developmental moderation • Via school visits • Via clusters

  26. Via school visits • MFT’s • Support visits • Educator files and learner assessment Files • Return visits • Developmental reports on a personal level • General routine reports to schools

  27. Via clusters • A series of developmental meetings • Samples of work will be observed • Joint standard setting exercises will take place

  28. Final moderation • Internal and developmental moderation should have ensured a degree of standardisation • Head Office must provide dates & venues for Dramatic Arts • At least one educator per school • 15% of schools total sample (5% if there are queries) • If there are less than 12 learners per school, then ALL the files

  29. Full set of educator files • Mark schedules • Group assessment takes place • Consensus decision about marks • Each educator file to be studied by at least three educators

  30. Administration • Educator provides marks as per guidelines • Computer sheets completed • Educator signs • Principal signs • SES checks and signs • Assessment coordinator submits to examinations directorate

More Related