1 / 42

CMPUT 412 Motion Control – Wheeled robots

CMPUT 412 Motion Control – Wheeled robots. Csaba Szepesv ári University of Alberta. TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: A A A A A A A A. Motion Control (wheeled robots). Requirements Kinematic/dynamic model of the robot

bud
Télécharger la présentation

CMPUT 412 Motion Control – Wheeled robots

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CMPUT 412Motion Control – Wheeled robots Csaba Szepesvári University of Alberta TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAAAAAAA

  2. Motion Control (wheeled robots) • Requirements • Kinematic/dynamic model of the robot • Model of the interaction between the wheel and the ground • Definition of required motion  • speed control, • position control • Control law that satisfies the requirements

  3. Mobile Robot Kinematics • Kinematics • Actuator motion  effector motion • What happens to the pose when I change the velocity of wheels/joints? • Neglects mass, does not consider forces (dynamics) • Aim • Description of mechanical behavior for design and control • Mobile robots vs. manipulators • Manipulators: 9f: £!X, x = f(µ) • Mobile robots: (#1 challenge!) • Physics: Wheel motion/constraints  robot motion

  4. Kinematics Model • Goal: • robot speed • Wheel speeds • Steering angles and speeds • Geometric parameters • forward kinematics • Inverse kinematics • Why not?

  5. Representing Robot Positions • Initial frame: • Robot frame: • Robot position: • Mapping between the two frames • Example: Robot aligned with YI

  6. Example

  7. Differential Drive Robot: Kinematics • wheel’s spinning speed  translation of P • Spinning speed  rotation around P wheel 2 wheel 1

  8. Differential Drive Robot: Kinematics II.

  9. Wheel Kinematic Constraints: Assumptions • Movement on a horizontal plane • Point contact of the wheels • Wheels not deformable • Pure rolling • v = 0 at contact point • No slipping, skidding or sliding • No friction for rotation around contact point • Steering axes orthogonal to the surface • Wheels connected by rigid frame (chassis)

  10. Wheel Kinematic Constraints:Fixed Standard Wheel

  11. Example • Suppose that the wheel A is in position such that • a = 0 and b = 0 • This would place the contact point of the wheel on XI with the plane of the wheel oriented parallel to YI. If q = 0, then this sliding constraint reduces to:

  12. Wheel Kinematic Constraints:Steered Standard Wheel

  13. Wheel Kinematic Constraints:Castor Wheel

  14. Wheel Kinematic Constraints:Swedish Wheel

  15. Wheel Kinematic Constraints:Spherical Wheel

  16. Robot Kinematic Constraints • Given a robot with M wheels • each wheel imposes zero or more constraints on the robot motion • only fixed and steerable standard wheels impose constraints • What is the maneuverability of a robot considering a combination of different wheels? • Suppose we have a total of N=Nf + Ns standard wheels • We can develop the equations for the constraints in matrix forms: • Rolling • Lateral movement

  17. Example: Differential Drive Robot • J1(¯s)=J1fC1(¯s)=C1f • ® = ? ¯ = ? • Right weel:® = -¼/2,¯ = ¼ • Left wheel:® = ¼/2, ¯ = 0

  18. Mobile Robot Maneuverability • Maneuverability = • mobility available based on the sliding constraints+ • additional freedom contributed by the steering • How many wheels? • 3 wheels  static stability • 3+ wheels  synchronization • Degree of maneuverability • Degree of mobility • Degree of steerability • Robots maneuverability

  19. Degree of Mobility • To avoid any lateral slip the motion vector has to satisfy the following constraints: • Mathematically: • must belong to the null space of the matrix • Geometrically this can be shown by the Instantaneous Center of Rotation (ICR)

  20. Instantaneous Center of Rotation • Ackermann Steering Bicycle

  21. Degree of Mobility++ • Robot chassis kinematics is a function of the set of independent constraints • the greater the rank of , the more constrained is the mobility • Mathematically • no standard wheels • all direction constrained • Examples: • Unicycle: One single fixed standard wheel • Differential drive: Two fixed standard wheels • wheels on same axle • wheels on different axle

  22. Degree of Steerability • Indirect degree of motion • The particular orientation at any instant imposes a kinematic constraint • However, the ability to change that orientation can lead additional degree of maneuverability • Range of : • Examples: • one steered wheel: Tricycle • two steered wheels: No fixed standard wheel • car (Ackermann steering): Nf = 2, Ns=2  common axle

  23. Robot Maneuverability • Degree of Maneuverability • Two robots with same are not necessary equal • Example: Differential drive and Tricycle (next slide) • For any robot with the ICR is always constrained to lie on a line • For any robot with the ICR is not constrained an can be set to any point on the plane • The Synchro Drive example:

  24. Wheel Configurations: ±M=2 • Differential Drive Tricycle

  25. Basic Types of 3-Wheel Configs

  26. Synchro Drive

  27. Workspace: Degrees of Freedom • What is the degree of vehicle’s freedom in its environment? • Car example • Workspace • how the vehicle is able to move between different configuration in its workspace? • The robot’s independently achievable velocities • = differentiable degrees of freedom (DDOF) = • Bicycle: DDOF=1; DOF=3 • Omni Drive: DDOF=3; DOF=3 • Maneuverability · DOF!

  28. Mobile Robot Workspace: Degrees of Freedom, Holonomy • DOF degrees of freedom: • Robots ability to achieve various poses • DDOF differentiable degrees of freedom: • Robots ability to achieve various path • Holonomic Robots • A holonomic kinematic constraint can be expressed a an explicit function of position variables only • A non-holonomic constraint requires a different relationship, such as the derivative of a position variable • Fixed and steered standard wheels impose non-holonomic constraints

  29. Non-Holonomic Systems • Non-holonomic systems • traveled distanceof each wheel is not sufficient to calculate the final position of the robot • one has also to know how this movement was executed as a function of time! • differential equations are not integrable to the final position s1=s2 ; s1R=s2R ; s1L=s2L but: x1 = x2 ; y1 = y2

  30. Path / Trajectory Considerations: Omnidirectional Drive

  31. Path / Trajectory Considerations: Two-Steer

  32. Beyond Basic Kinematics • Speed, force & mass  dynamics • Important when: • High speed • High/varying mass • Limited torque • Friction, slip, skid, .. • How to actuate: “motorization” • How to get to some goal pose: “controllability”

  33. Motion Control (kinematic control) • Objective: • follow a trajectory • position and/or velocity profiles as function of time. • Motion control is not straightforward: • mobile robots are non-holonomic systems! • Most controllers are not considering the dynamics of the system

  34. Motion Control: Open Loop Control • Trajectory (path) divided in motion segments of clearly defined shape: • straight lines and segments of a circle. • Control problem: • pre-compute a smooth trajectory based on line and circle segments • Disadvantages: • It is not at all an easy task to pre-compute a feasible trajectory • limitations and constraints of the robots velocities and accelerations • does not adapt or correct the trajectory if dynamical changes of the environment occur • The resulting trajectories are usually not smooth

  35. Feedback Control • Find a control matrix K, if exists with kij=k(t,e) • such that the control of v(t) and w(t) • drives the error e to zero.

  36. Kinematics: a: angle between the xR axis of the robots reference frame and the vector connecting the center of the axle of the wheels with the final position Dy Kinematic Position Control: Differential Drive Robot

  37. Dy Coordinate Transformation Coordinate transformation into polar coordinates with origin at goal position: System description, in the new polar coordinates for for

  38. Remarks • The coordinates transformation is not defined at x = y = 0; as in such a point the determinant of the Jacobian matrix of the transformation is not defined, i.e. it is unbounded • For the forward direction of the robot points toward the goal, for it is the backward direction. • By properly defining the forward direction of the robot at its initial configuration, it is always possible to have at t=0. However this does not mean that a remains in I1 for all time t. a

  39. The Control Law • It can be shown, that withthe feedback controlled system • will drive the robot to • The control signal v has always constant sign, • the direction of movement is kept positive or negative during movement • parking maneuver is performed always in the most natural way and without ever inverting its motion.

  40. Kinematic Position Control: Resulting Path

  41. Kinematic Position Control: Stability Issue • It can further be shown, that the closed loop control system is locally exponentially stable if • Proof: for small x -> cosx = 1, sinx = xand the characteristic polynomial of the matrix A of all roots have negative real parts.

  42. Summary • Kinematics: actuator motion  effector motion • Mobil robots: Relating speeds • Manipulators: Relating poses • Wheel constraints • Rolling constraints • Sliding constraints • Maneuverability (DOF) = mobility (=DDOF) + steerability • Zero motion line, instantaneous center of rotation (ICR) • Holonomic vs. non-holonomic • Path, trajectory • Feedforward vs. feedback control • Kinematic control

More Related