1 / 33

The Sigmaplan: policy-integration and stakeholder management

The Sigmaplan: policy-integration and stakeholder management. 1/07/2014. ir. Maarten Jans commissioned by ir. Wim Dauwe Waterways and Sea Canal (W&Z) Sea Scheldt Department. NWRM – workshop 1.07.2014 Agenda. Waterways & Sea Canal the Sigmaplan Introduction

burton-coffey
Télécharger la présentation

The Sigmaplan: policy-integration and stakeholder management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Sigmaplan:policy-integration and stakeholder management 1/07/2014 ir. Maarten Jans commissioned by ir. Wim Dauwe Waterways and Sea Canal (W&Z) Sea Scheldt Department

  2. NWRM – workshop 1.07.2014Agenda Waterways & Sea Canal the Sigmaplan Introduction Policy-integration and preparation Safety, Nature and Economic growth for Flanders Stakeholder management Participation and public support

  3. NWRM – workshop 1.07.2014Agenda Waterways & Sea Canal the Sigmaplan Introduction Policy-integrationandpreparation Safety, Nature andEconomicgrowthforFlanders Stakeholder management Participationand public support

  4. Waterways & Sea Canal Flemish Government agency (Belgium) • Stimulate multifunctional use of the waterways • Ensure safety and manage flood risk (Sigmaplan) • Manage living on and around the waterway • Stimulate recreation, tourism and nature experiences • Enhance the link between water & city

  5. NWRM – workshop 1.07.2014Agenda Waterways & Sea Canal the Sigmaplan Introduction Policy-integrationandpreparation Safety, Nature andEconomicgrowthforFlanders Stakeholder management Participationand public support

  6. the Sigmaplan Why?

  7. the Sigmaplan Why? Baasrode Wintam Wintam Antwerpen

  8. the Sigmaplan What? • Sigmaplan 1976 • Higherandstrongerdikes: 512 km • 13 Flood Control Areas • TidalBarrier

  9. the Sigmaplan What? • Sigmaplan 1976 • Higherandstrongerdikes: 512 km • 13 Flood Control Areas • TidalBarrier

  10. the Sigmaplan What? • Sigmaplan 1976 • Higherandstrongerdikes: 512 km • 13 Flood Control Areas • TidalBarrier

  11. the Sigmaplan What? • Sigmaplan 1976 • Higherandstrongerdikes: 512 km • 13 Flood Control Areas • TidalBarrier

  12. NWRM – workshop 1.07.2014Agenda Waterways & Sea Canal the Sigmaplan Introduction Policy-integrationandpreparation Safety, Nature andEconomicgrowthforFlanders Stakeholder management Participationand public support

  13. Policy integration and preparation Safety, Nature and Economic growth for Flanders • Updated Sigmaplan dd. 2005, necessity: • Endangered Aquatic and marine fauna and flora (natura 2000 – habitat directive) • Reassessment of flood risk (climate change – spatial planning) • Economic value of the river Scheldt

  14. Policy integration and preparation Safety, Nature and Economic growth for Flanders project areas of the Sigma Plan • 1976 (start) – 2005 (actualisation) – 2030 (completion) • 500+ kilometers riverdykes • 5,000 hectares flood control andnatureareas

  15. NWRM – workshop 1.07.2014Agenda Waterways & Sea Canal the Sigmaplan Introduction Policy-integrationandpreparation Safety, Nature andEconomicgrowthforFlanders Stakeholder management Participationand public support

  16. Multiple goals, several win-win’s, many stakeholders Optimizing Safety: waterway managers, localresidents, … Developingnaturalquality: environmentalorganisations, … Economy: port companies, farmers, boatmen… Recreation : cyclists, hikers, canoeists, pleasurecraft operators Overal: resident, localmunicipalities (politicians) Difficultchoicesneedtobe madeRoom for the river = lessspaceforhumans needtoexpropriate or purchasesoils anddevelopcompensationmeasures Stakeholder managementStakeholders

  17. Stakeholder managementDifferent levels • Program level • Planning Phase • Implementation Phase • Project level • Planning Phase • Construction Phase

  18. Stakeholder managementDifferent levels • Program level • Planning Phase • Implementation Phase • Project level • Planning Phase • Construction Phase

  19. comprehensive studies Stakeholder managementplanning phase DAMAGE AND VICTIME MODEL Damage (€) per return period for 2000 and 2100 for everymunicipality HYDROLOGICAL MODEL Flooding simulations per return period for 2000 and 2100 SELECTION OF MEASURES COSTS-BENEFITS MODEL Floodingrisks, profitability, pay-back time ADDITIONAL EFFECTS Agriculture, View of neighbours, Nature CALCULATING COSTS MODEL Estimation investmentcosts and maintenance costs

  20. Intensive consultationbefore en duringdecision making governmentdepartments civil society organisations Agricultural Nature (recreation) Politicians … Last phase: via environmental assessment report Localmunicipalities, residents  Resulted in optimalisations of the plan + support on program level (= macro) Stakeholder managementplanning phase

  21. Stakeholder managementDifferent levels • Program level • Planning Phase • Implementation Phase • Project level • Planning Phase • Construction Phase

  22. Stakeholder managementDifferent levels • Program level • Planning Phase • Implementation Phase • Project level • Planning Phase • Construction Phase

  23. Stakeholder managementProgram Level - ImplementaionPhase Sounding Board Committee (social feedback) SteeringCommittee (strategicchoices - policy feedback)

  24. Stakeholder managementProgram Level - ImplementaionPhase Thematical committees Sounding Board Committee (social feedback) SteeringCommittee (strategicchoices - policy feedback) Nature - landscape Supportingagricultural policy Technical infrastructure recreation safety

  25. Stakeholder managementDifferent levels • Program level • Planning Phase • Implementation Phase • Project level • Planning Phase • Construction Phase

  26. Stakeholder managementProject Level – Planning Phase FRAMEWORK( SIGMA PLAN 2005 ) Project target: 850 ha wetlandssearch area : 1,300 ha timing : start constructionby 2015 Project development process STAKEHOLDERS regionalandlocalauthorities sectoral interest groups 30,000 directlyinvolvedresidents TECHNICAL STUDIES Agriculture Impact Assessement Surfaceandground water model Ecological niche model PROCEDURES Environmental Impact AssesmentRegionalSpationImplementation PlanApplyingfor permits RESULT land use plan safety – ecologyecological management plan recreationandtourism plan CONSTRUCTION Starting 2015 andonwards

  27. Stakeholder managementProject Level – Planning & ImplementationPhase Communication Management: Project Committee (localauthorities, incl. politicians) … Nature - landscape Supportingagricultural policy recreation Thematical committees

  28. Stakeholder managementDifferent levels • Program level • Planning Phase • Implementation Phase • Project level • Planning Phase • Construction Phase

  29. Stakeholder managementProgram Level - ImplementaionPhase

  30. Firm basis extensivemultidisciplinary system studies legal policy decision Uniform process lay-out preparation consultation formal procedures realisation Main goal Safety & Nature in Scheldt estuary robustandself-sustainingecosystem  Withminimalsocial impact & maximalsocial support Conclusionkeyelements

  31. The Sigmaplan:policy-integration and stakeholder management 1/07/2014 ir. Maarten Jans commissioned by ir. Wim Dauwe Waterways and Sea Canal (W&Z) Sea Scheldt Department

  32. Policy integration and preparationmore sustainable approach Deeperinsight in the estuary’smanyfunctions Integral water management Respect the variousfunctions of the water system; Avoidnegativeconsequencesfor the environment; Seekaddedvalueandsynergies ROOM FOR THE RIVER APPROACH Movingdykeslandward (de-poldering) More complex ‘controlledreducestides’ (GGG) New riverareas (new alignment of the embankment)

  33. Policy integration and preparation Safety, Nature and Economic growth for Flanders • PAST • Decisionsbased on high water levels; • Basic rule: water canbesuppressed; • taller, strongerdykes • flood control areas • 2005 • Decisionsbased on potentialdamage (costs –benefits); • ‘Floods are also part of the Scheldt’; • Safety vision: Betterprotectionbygiving the river more room tobreathe

More Related