1 / 26

REVE 2009 April 2 nd , 2009 IEF, Orsay - FRANCE

Self-organization of Vehicular Networks Mohamed Oussama CHERIF, Sidi-Mohammed SENOUCI, Bertrand DUCOURTHIAL, Ismail SALHI Orange Labs. REVE 2009 April 2 nd , 2009 IEF, Orsay - FRANCE. Self-organization of Vehicular Networks. Self-organization of vehicular networks

chaz
Télécharger la présentation

REVE 2009 April 2 nd , 2009 IEF, Orsay - FRANCE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Self-organization of Vehicular NetworksMohamed Oussama CHERIF, Sidi-Mohammed SENOUCI, Bertrand DUCOURTHIAL, Ismail SALHIOrange Labs REVE 2009 April 2nd, 2009 IEF, Orsay - FRANCE

  2. Self-organization of Vehicular Networks • Self-organization of vehicular networks • Vehicular networks: Characteristics & Challenges • Self-organization • Problem & Motivation • CSP & CGP • CSP & CGP assets • CSP: Function & Performances evaluation • CGP: Function & Performances evaluation • Conclusion & perspectives 1 2 3

  3. Self-organization of Vehicular Networks • Self-organization of vehicular networks • Vehicular networks: Characteristics & Challenges • Self-organization • Problem & Motivation • CSP & CGP • CSP & CGP assets • CSP: Function & Performances evaluation • CGP: Function & Performances evaluation • Conclusion & perspectives 1 Self-organization 2 3

  4. Self-organization of Vehicular Networks Vehicular Networks Problem & Motivation Self-organization Definition "A vehicular network is a communication network providing communications among nearby vehicles and between vehicles and nearby fixed equipments". Self-organization

  5. Self-organization of Vehicular Networks Vehicular Networks Problem & Motivation Self-organization • Power, processing and communication abilities • High mobility, network topology & connectivity • Frequent topology changes: Partition of the network Characteristics Self-organization • Socio-economical challenges (standardization development, Business models, Market introduction) • Technical challenges (Security, Mobility management, Routing, Addressing, Self-organization) Challenges

  6. Self-organization of Vehicular Networks Vehicular Networks Problem & Motivation Self-organization • Two types of Self-organization depending on the application • Proactive (e.g. Internet Access, File downloading, etc.) • Reactive (e.g. Data collection, Real-time info-traffic) What is self-organization? "Self-organization can be defined as the emergence of system-wide adaptive structure and functionality from simple local interactions between individual entities". C. Bettstetter Self-organization

  7. Self-organization of Vehicular Networks Vehicular Networks Problem & Motivation Self-organization Why self-organization? • Reduction of High mobility effects • Simplification of the management task • Reduction of the routing overhead • Reduction of the deployed infrastructure • Relaying on V2V communications to extend the range of roadside units • Minimization of the use of costly links (cellular links) and use of free frequencies (e.g. 802.11) to achieve data collection Self-organization

  8. Self-organization of Vehicular Networks Vehicular Networks Problem & Motivation Self-organization • Two collateral structures to self-organize the VANET (Vehicular Ad hoc Networks) efficiently • Virtual backbone • Clustering How self-organize? Self-organization Problem Dynamicity of clusters Great overhead

  9. Self-organization of Vehicular Networks Vehicular Networks Problem & Motivation Self-organization Our Objectives • Minimization of the overhead due to the dynamicity of clusters • Stability of clusters • Optimization of use of the cellular links in case of data collection Self-organization Solution CSP & CGP

  10. CSP: Cluster-based Self-organizing Protocol • Self-organization of vehicular networks • Vehicular networks: Characteristics & Challenges • Self-organization • Problem & Motivation • CSP & CGP • CSP & CGP assets • CSP: Function & Performances evaluation • CGP: Function & Performances evaluation • Conclusion & perspectives 1 2 CSP & CGP 3

  11. CSP: Cluster-based Self-organizing Protocol CSP & CGP assets CSP: Function & Performances CGP: Function & Performances • CSP & CGP rely on fixed clusters • Reduction of overhead • CSP elects cluster heads intelligently • Increase of clusters lifetime • CGP uses VANET multi-hop communication to aggregate data • Minimization of use of cellular links Assets CSP & CGP

  12. CSP: Cluster-based Self-organizing Protocol CSP & CGP assets CSP: Function & Performances CGP: Function & Performances • Division of a road portion into L-length segments • Each segment defines a fixed-cluster Architecture Overview CSP & CGP ECA • CSP: Two modules • Head election • Inter-segment transition

  13. CSP: Cluster-based Self-organizing Protocol CSP & CGP assets CSP: Function & Performances CGP: Function & Performances Head Election • The current Head broadcasts a Head_Resign 1 4 5 7 3 8 6 2 • When receiving a Head_Req, the current head sends a Head_Ack to the elected candidate in which it includes its SGMT_TABLE CSP & CGP • Each vehicle that fulfills the following conditions is a candidate (VM . VN > 0) AND (M does not yet reached CZ+(N)) (VM . VN < 0) AND (M is situated in CZ(N) • The elected candidate sets its state to HEAD and broadcasts a Head_Update_Ack in its segment • Each candidate computes a E_Factor which reflects the estimated time to reach the CZ farthest border • The previous head sets its state to SUPER_MBR and other segment nodes update their head and stop sending Head_Req • Each candidate waits for a backoff which is inversely proportional to its E_Factor before sending a Head_Req

  14. CSP: Cluster-based Self-organizing Protocol CSP & CGP assets CSP: Function & Performances CGP: Function & Performances Inter-segment transition • Each MBR verifies periodically (Pcheck) its position • If the MBR 'a' has to leave its current segment a … a a … CSP & CGP • It broadcasts a Mbr_Add_Req • The next segment Head adds 'a' to its table and sends a Mbr_Add_Notif to it • 'a' sends a Mbr_Remove request to its current Head • The current Head removes 'a from its table and sends a Mbr_Remove_Notif to it • 'a' updates its segment and sets its state to MBR

  15. CSP: Cluster-based Self-organizing Protocol CSP & CGP assets CSP: Function & Performances CGP: Function & Performances Role of a SUPER_MBR • SUPER_MBR routes packets if neighboring heads can not reach each other in one hop CSP F-CSP Variant • No need of SUPER_MBR

  16. CSP: Cluster-based Self-organizing Protocol CSP & CGP assets CSP: Function & Performances CGP: Function & Performances Simulation results Stability CSP & CGP Clusters Lifetime Vs Network Density

  17. CSP: Cluster-based Self-organizing Protocol CSP & CGP assets CSP: Function & Performances CGP: Function & Performances Overhead CSP & CGP Overhead Vs Network Density

  18. CSP: Cluster-based Self-organizing Protocol CSP & CGP assets CSP: Function & Performances CGP: Function & Performances Delivery Ratio CSP & CGP Delivery Ratio Vs Packet sending interval Delivery Ratio Vs Network Density

  19. CSP: Cluster-based Self-organizing Protocol CSP & CGP assets CSP: Function & Performances CGP: Function & Performances CGP: Function Data collection CH election tsel Inter- segment Relaying tcol tseg CSP & CGP No Data aggregation RSU? tagr Sending to Operator Yes tsta

  20. CSP: Cluster-based Self-organizing Protocol CSP & CGP assets CSP: Function & Performances CGP: Function & Performances Head election Segment CSP & CGP • Eligibility computing • All nodes that have Back-off > 0 • If Back(j)=0 j eligible  CH = j • End of CH-election stage Backoff > 0 Backoff = 0 CH Not eligible Initial state

  21. CSP: Cluster-based Self-organizing Protocol CSP & CGP assets CSP: Function & Performances CGP: Function & Performances Sending data to the operator Operator TraficServices Cellular link

  22. CSP: Cluster-based Self-organizing Protocol CSP & CGP assets CSP: Function & Performances CGP: Function & Performances Simulation scenarios Scenario1 Per-node sending Scenario2 Per-CH sending CSP & CGP Scenario3 Seg-to-Seg sending

  23. CSP: Cluster-based Self-organizing Protocol CSP & CGP assets CSP: Function & Performances CGP: Function & Performances V2V & V2I messages CSP & CGP V2I messages V2V messages

  24. Self-organization of Vehicular Networks • Self-organization of vehicular networks • Vehicular networks: Characteristics & Challenges • Self-organization • Problem & Motivation • CSP & CGP • CSP & CGP assets • CSP: Function & Performances evaluation • CGP: Function & Performances evaluation • Conclusion & perspectives 1 2 3 Conclusion

  25. Conclusion & perspectives • Proposition of CSP/CGP: A proactive/ reactive self-organizing architecture • CSP added values • Stability • Overhead reduction • High delivery ratio • CGP added values • Minimization of use of cellular links in case of data collection • Future Works • Extension of the simulation study • Handover between ECAs Conclusion

  26. Thank you for your attention Contact • Mohamed oussama CHERIF • Orange Labs CORE/M2I • 2 Avenue Pierre Marzin • 22307 Lannion Cedex, France • Email: mohamed.cherif@orange-ftgroup.com • Tel: +33 2 96051292

More Related