1 / 27

` THE ROLE OF WRS & FINANCIAL SERVICES IN IMPROVING PRODUCE MARKETING BY SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN KENYA

` THE ROLE OF WRS & FINANCIAL SERVICES IN IMPROVING PRODUCE MARKETING BY SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN KENYA. By Edward Kateiya KENFAP 8 th November 2011. Introduction . Follow up of earlier study on government interventions in input & output markets Address emerging demand from KENFAP members

cleantha
Télécharger la présentation

` THE ROLE OF WRS & FINANCIAL SERVICES IN IMPROVING PRODUCE MARKETING BY SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN KENYA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. `THE ROLE OF WRS & FINANCIAL SERVICES IN IMPROVING PRODUCE MARKETING BY SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN KENYA By Edward Kateiya KENFAP 8th November 2011

  2. Introduction • Follow up of earlier study on government interventions in input & output markets • Address emerging demand from KENFAP members • Two case studies-improve smallholder accessibility to: • WRS • Financial services • Carried out in August- September 2011 • Generate evidence to: • inform WRS policy , regulation and legal framework • lobby for appropriately Financial/Insurance products for smallholder farmers • Partners involved – • KENFAP supported by Agrinatura-Natural Resource Institute (NRI) & Wageningen University ( LEI)

  3. Problem statement • Commodity markets operates in dynamic environment • Supply & Demand forces • Climate change • Government policies • High Post harvest losses and disorganized markets • Perpetuate waste and reduce economic returns • Inadequate information on markets • Inappropriately packaged financial products/ services

  4. Rationale • Demand from KENFAP members for accessible WRS • Emerging gaps in the ongoing process on WRS policies and regulation formulation • Lack of awareness on WRS and its benefits • Farmers reaction on the pilot WRS-mixed • Maize marketing operate in a liberalized market system • Financial institutions sceptical - ability of smallholder farmers

  5. Objectives – Case 1: WRS • To understand the operations, risks, challenges and enabling environment for WRS • To identify the capacity needs of SH farmers to engage in WRS • To determine how best WRS can improve grain management and marketing

  6. Case 2-Financial & Insurance Services • To identify existing financial credit sources and insurance services available for SH. • To examine terms and conditions of loans targeting SH and identify impediments or difficulties • To identify the hidden costs embedded in bank loans and identify the cost of risk participation by Banks and Micro finance Institutions

  7. Overview of WRS approaches • American elevators • Latin America-title document • Colombia- Banks • Eastern Europe & Soviet Union- licensing regimes • Hungarian system-Regulatory agencies & indemnity funds • India-Futures markets • South Africa-SAFEX-stock exchange • Malawi- subsidy production-many crops • Madagascar-Credit-led system-CECAM • Kenya • certified WRS pilot-EAGC & NCPB • Uncertified –Cereal Banks

  8. WRS initiatives in Kenya • WRS focus on maize and wheat • Builds on pilot initiatives by • EAGC-membership-certified WRS • Lesiolo-private • NCPB-public • Grain bulk handlers of Mombasa-private • KACE-Market information • Cereal bulking initiatives by public and private actors

  9. Smallholder farmers’ capacity (input, output, Price, quality, standards, skills, organisation & information flow) Better storage Reliability Improved Livelihoods Sustained quality Credit Support services (financial, insurance, research and extension) Collateral Security Enabling environment (policies, regulations, legal framework) Conceptual Framework W R S

  10. Methodology • Design • Cross section study • National level-Key informants • Local level-Field activities & farmers • Sample size & Sampling procedure- • Sample size 240 farmers –randomly sampled • Key Institutions /organizations-Purposive base on functions & role • Study sites -purposively selected based on:- • WRS activities • Regional diversity • Agro ecological Zones

  11. Methodology cont… • Study sites • Western-Bungoma • Nyanza-Siaya • Eastern-Meru North & Makueni • Rift Valley- Nakuru, Narok, Marakwet & TransNzoia • Data collection • Reconnaissance survey • 2 Checklists-WRS & Financial services • -Primary-Personal Interviews • Secondary- overview of WRS approaches-global, regional & local initiatives • Data Analysis-Qualitative & quantitative • Presentation of preliminary results to KENFAP Technical team and Agrinatura • Preliminary report and validation workshop

  12. RESULTS UNDERSTANDING THE WRS OPERATIONS • Process-lengthy & bureaucratic • Limited access by smallholder farmers-10% • Large scale farmers & traders-90% access • Few certified Warehouses-14-EAGC & NCPB • Several community cereal banks • Inadequate awareness-80% of smallholder farmers interviewed were not aware about WRS

  13. UNDERSTANDING THE RISKS • Price volatility • Weather conditions • Theft • Trust • Inadequate information sharing • Farmers harvesting at the same time

  14. UNDERSTANDING THE WRS CHALLENGES • WRS is a new terminology • High costs of storage 8 -11% • High costs of transportation and long distance travelled - av 20km to the Nearest certified NCPB warehouse • 90 % of the respondents failed to meet quality tests • Minimum -10 metric tonnes (NCPB) & 50 metric tonnes (Lesiolo)-WRs -Not accessible to smallholder farmers • 80% of the respondents interviewed complained long intake procedure & piece meal quality related technicalities •  70 % of the respondents claimed storage does not cover the costs due to fluctuating produce prices

  15. UNDERSTANDING THE WRS OPERATING ENVIRONMENT • Gentlemen arrangement & loose contracts • No WRS policy • No WRS rules & regulation • Informal engagement with competent authorities-KEBs & KEPHIS • Policy formulation, development of rules & regulation as well as legal framework ongoing

  16. Smallholders’ Capacity to engage in WRS

  17. How best WRS can improve grain management & marketing • Change in price- (kshs 1,800-3,000)- 66.7% -within 6 months • Net benefits increase by 54 % • Secured Loan- 50-80%-Equity Bank , Cooperative society • Maintaining quality of the grains • Improved Bargaining power • Security of the stored grain • Market information

  18. Types of WRS in Kenya

  19. Recommendations: Case 1 • Federate farmers into Cooperatives/associations- • Build capacity of SH farmers to effectively engage in WRS • Increase awareness on WRS to all stakeholders-Banks, depositors, WRS operators, Insurers • Improve market information systems to favour to smallholder farmers • Need for national policy, regulatory and Legal framework for WRS • Fast track the process of policy & regulation formulation • Innovate affordable warehouse-gradual progression from Community Cereal Banks to fully fledged WRS linked to Commercial Warehouses • Establish training centre and incorporate in school curriculum

  20. Financial products

  21. Financial products cont’

  22. Financial products Cont’

  23. Relevance & appropriateness of Financial products • Requirements-organized group, farmer, account holder, minimum quantity per day, pay slip, membership • Interest rate-12%-18% • Other charges-insurance, processing fee,-2.5-6% • Very expensive default action-create fear

  24. Insurance services/products • Many existing insurance products • Livestock-dairy cow, beef, poultry, sheep & goats • Crop-sugar cane, French beans, sorghum, artemisia • Crops- Kilimo salama

  25. Challenges on insurance services • organization of farmers-smallholder farmers • Difficulties in developing index products-data • The Kenya meteorology department-manual • No insurance premium financing-structure • poor history of insurance –limited trust.

  26. Recommendations • Package lending to suit farming cycle • Attitude change toward agriculture-risk • Building trust between banks and insurance • Develop alternative approaches on dealing with defaulters • Improve technical skills on agricultural financing and insurance • Further research

  27. Thank you

More Related