1 / 19

Silicon Detector Design Study Tracking Analysis Program for the International Linear Collider

Silicon Detector Design Study Tracking Analysis Program for the International Linear Collider. Pelham Keahey Richard Partridge SULI 2008. International Linear Collider (ILC). Graphic courtesy of ILC / form one visual communication. SiD Detector Concept Design.

cortez
Télécharger la présentation

Silicon Detector Design Study Tracking Analysis Program for the International Linear Collider

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Silicon Detector Design Study Tracking Analysis Program for the International Linear Collider Pelham Keahey Richard Partridge SULI 2008

  2. International Linear Collider (ILC) Graphic courtesy of ILC / form one visual communication

  3. SiD Detector Concept Design Graphic courtesy of Norman Graf, SLAC/Sandbox Studio

  4. Analysis Program Objectives • Develop a program(s) to: • Display and analyze pull distributions of five helix parameters • Track purity and the fake track rate • Track finding Efficiency

  5. Helix Parameters • ω - curvature of the track • δ -distance of closest approach (dca) • Ф0 -azimuthmal angle of the momentum at the dca • tan λ-dz/ds, slope in the sz plane • z0 -z position at the dca

  6. Helix Parameter Calculations • ω • δ xc= x + R sin f yc= y - R cosf δ = R - (xc2+ yc2)1/2 • Ф0 • tan λ tan λ =pz / (px2 + py2)1/2 • z0 z = z0 + s tanl

  7. Pull Distributions • Error is different per fitted helix (track) • Tracks will go through different part of the detector • Multiple scattering • How many hits

  8. Z0 Pull Distribution

  9. Purity—FakeTrack Rate • Purity is taking the hits used to create a track and determining how many of those hits are actually from the MCParticle’s path being fitted • For the Z0 events the tracking program produced no fake tracks. Fake Tracks are defined as having a purity less than 0.5

  10. (1-Purity) vs Hits

  11. Efficiency • Efficiency is calculated by taking the number of found tracks divided by the number of tracks that could have been found • The simulation is currently setup to ignore certain particles • Pt<1.1 GeV (particle that doesn’t enter the calorimeter) • Also if z0 > 9 mm and a δ > 9 mm • 7 hits minimum

  12. Efficiency vs Theta

  13. Efficiency vs Pt

  14. Wire View One (Rho-z) event # 130

  15. Wire View Two (xy) event # 130

  16. Results • Purity: Tracks can be expected to be pure around 96.4+-0.2% of the time, depending on event. • In the Z0 we found no tracks below the 0.5 purity margin. • Efficiency: During the same event 98.6±0.1% of the findable tracks were found.

  17. Future Work • As the detector evolves, different designs can be tested • Different and more complicated events can be run

  18. Acknowledgements • Advisor: Richard Partridge • life saving help: CosminDeaconu • Everyone at SLAC • DOE

  19. References J. Alcaraz, Helicoidal tracks. L3 Internal Note 1666, February 18, 1995. Internation Linear Collider website. http://www.linearcollider.org/cms/

More Related