1 / 10

Diocese of Covington PEP

Diocese of Covington PEP. Mini-Conference Georgetown, KY. District Information. Diocese of Covington 38 schools – 29 elementary, 9 secondary Boone County region St. Henry District HS 5 “feeder” schools Needs Curriculum alignment (vertical & horizontal) Teacher resources (networking).

danae
Télécharger la présentation

Diocese of Covington PEP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Diocese of Covington PEP Mini-Conference Georgetown, KY

  2. District Information • Diocese of Covington • 38 schools – 29 elementary, 9 secondary • Boone County region • St. Henry District HS • 5 “feeder” schools • Needs • Curriculum alignment (vertical & horizontal) • Teacher resources (networking)

  3. Project Description • Outcomes • Implement process for on-going curriculum improvement • Reinforce curriculum as work-in-progress, never finished • Open dialogue among teachers • Develop support network, including resources from IHEs

  4. Project Description • Curriculum Alignment Process - Science • Teachers describe concepts currently taught in curriculum • Committee collects descriptions, identifies concepts for modifications/updates • Teachers decide on presentation to students, assessment, & resources needed • Committee compiles into “Working Curriculum Document”

  5. Project Description • Teacher Conference Day • Presentation of activities to aid instruction of concepts • Presentations by college faculty, select other teachers • Non-consumable materials needed for all activities provided to each school in attendance • Equitable distribution of technology – probes for implementation of activities

  6. Early Successes & Hindrances • Successes • Support from administration • Dedicated, hard-working committee • Hindrances • Lack of guidance by administration • Minimal understanding of curriculum development • “Your scope is too broad…”

  7. IHE Relationship • Dr. Bradley Sieve, NKU • Center for Integrative Natural Science and Mathematics • Partnership Experiences • Prior contact with committee members • Chemistry Alliance, demonstration resources • Supportive, knowledgeable, well-connected • Helped to understand curriculum planning & alignment process • Located resources (both human and material)

  8. Project Evaluation • PIMSER-developed surveys (pre- and post-) • Use of newly aligned curriculum • Effectiveness of suggested activities/assessments • Use of provided technology (probeware)

  9. PEP Process Evaluation • Pros • PEP staff support • Readily available, informative, extremely helpful • Information Dissemination • Always felt informed of expectations, duties, and progress • Cons • Delay of start date frustrated committee members • Selection of district to submit PEP application • Suggestion: • Select district, then distribute information and meet to discuss plans one-on-one

  10. Questions?

More Related