1 / 38

Knowledge of Language

Knowledge of Language. January 19, 2012. Mission Objectives. Wrap up Prescriptivism ~ Descriptivism Try to figure out how language can be creative . The previous problems with prescriptivism: Confusion about application of prescriptive rules (they’re not natural) Hypercorrection

danae
Télécharger la présentation

Knowledge of Language

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Knowledge of Language January 19, 2012

  2. Mission Objectives • Wrap up Prescriptivism ~ Descriptivism • Try to figure out how language can be creative. • The previous problems with prescriptivism: • Confusion about application of prescriptive rules • (they’re not natural) • Hypercorrection • Standards can shift over time • Prescriptive rules form a poor understanding of natural language.

  3. Non-Standard Sentences • How do you feel about the following sentences? • I’m done my homework. • I borrowed him some money. • My car needs washed. • All I do anymore is work. • Mary said that she wanted to come with. • If someone had invited me, I would have went to the party. • Note: the grammaticality of these sentences can vary from group to group, or speaker to speaker. • (In a sense, linguistics can be a “personal science”.)

  4. “a” prefixing, part 1 a. The man likes sailing. b. The man went sailing. Correct answer: (b) (57-1) a. William thinks fishing is silly. b. William goes fishing every Sunday. Correct answer: (b) (56-2) Rule: [a-] form cannot be a noun.

  5. “a” prefixing, part 2 a. The woman was coming down the stairs. b. The movie was shocking. Correct answer: (a) (53-5) a. The movie was fascinating. b. The movie kept jumping up and down. Correct answer: (b) (52-6) Rule: [a-] form cannot be an adjective.

  6. “a” prefixing, part 3 a. He makes money by building houses. b. He makes money building houses. Correct answer: (b) (55-3) a. Sally got sick cooking chicken. b. Sally got sick from cooking chicken. Correct answer: (a) (50-8) Rule: [a-] form cannot be preceded by a preposition.

  7. “a” prefixing, part 4 • a. Sam was following the trail. b. Sam was discovering the cave. Correct answer: (a) (57-1) • a. The man was hollering at the hunters. b. The man was recalling what happened that night. Correct answer: (a) (55-3) Rule: first syllable of [a-] form must be stressed. Note: “The man was a-tellin’ what happened that night.” Also: Al-freakin’-berta • Lastly: 44 people got all 8 correct.

  8. Descriptive Benefits • Language tends to operate in patterns, even if they are non-standard. • Important: Appalachian English speakers are not just speaking English with mistakes. • Descriptive linguistics enables us to understand how those patterns work. • History of economics analogy.

  9. To Be Fair • Standards are useful because they provide a single form of the language to teach to non-native speakers. • They help establish uniformity in the written language. • They can help clear up confusions. • for instance: supposably • They also help to distinguish those who have mastered the arbitrary rules from those who haven’t. • (for better or worse) • Otherwise: • They are not useful for (scientific) linguistic analysis.

  10. Previous Quick Write

  11. Previous Quick Write

  12. Previous Quick Write

  13. Check it out! • Try your hand at interpreting “Prairie Dog-ese”: • http://www.npr.org/2011/01/20/132650631/new-language-discovered-prairiedogese

  14. Linguistic Creativity (again) • One of the crucial design features of language was creativity (or productivity). • Charles Hockett: • “Language users can create and understand completely novel messages.” • “In a language, new messages are freely coined by blending, analogizing from, or transforming old ones. This says that every language has grammatical patterning.” • “In a language, either new or old elements are freely assigned new semantic loads by circumstances and context. This says that in every language new idioms constantly come into existence.” • How is it possible for human beings to do this?

  15. To Infinity and Beyond • Last week, we found out that honeybees can produce a variety of different “dance messages”. • = “Food source beyond 65 feet, fly at 0 • degree angle with the sun.” • = “Food source beyond 65 feet, fly at 45 • degree angle with the sun.”

  16. To Infinity and Beyond • The number of different messages the bees can produce is limited only by the number of angles they can differentiate: • “Food source beyond 65 feet, fly at 1 degree angle with the sun.” • “Food source beyond 65 feet, fly at 2 degree angle with the sun.” • …………… • “Food source beyond 65 feet, fly at 359 degree angle with the sun.” • Q: Can the bees dance at angles they haven’t seen before? • If so, how?

  17. To Infinity and Beyond • A: yes, if they dance according to rule. •  Their dances have to fit into a meaningful pattern. • The rule = “Food source beyond 65 feet, fly at X degree angle with the sun.” •  The bees have to know the rule. • Knowing the rule enables them to exhibit “creativity”, in a sense.

  18. Different Infinities • What kind of infinities exist in human language? • Note that we can say (translations of) everything the bees can say: • Fly at a 1 degree angle with the sun. • Fly at a 2 degree angle with the sun. • …………… • Fly at a 359 degree angle with the sun. • • We can get as detailed as we want to about it, too: • Fly at a 45 degree, 13 minute, 27.6685 second angle with the sun.

  19. Infinity + 1 • In addition to the infinity of things the bees can say, we can say other things, too. • Examples (borrowed from Ray Jackendoff): • A numeral is not a numbskull. • A numeral is not a nun. • A numeral is not a nunnery. • …………… • A nun is not a nursery. • …………… • An oboe is not an octopus.

  20. Linguistic Infinities • These are uninteresting, but novel sentences. • In order to understand them, you must know the rule by which they are constructed. • Rule: • [Sentence] = A X is not a Y. • Point: • Knowledge of rules is more abstract than just knowledge of sentences.

  21. Language Model #1 • In this model, all we “know” are the individual sentences we can use in language. • (no rules) • This is a good enough model to describe the vervets’ (or prairie dogs’) “language”. A nun is not a nursery. Fly at a 45 degree angle with the sun. I like linguistics.

  22. Language Model #2 • In this model, we “know” all the rules we can use to combine words to form sentences in a language. • This is a good enough model to describe the bees’ “language”. • Is it good enough for human language? A X is not a Y. X at a Y degree angle with the Z. X likes Y.

  23. What do you think? • No. There are even bigger infinities. • Check out these sentences: • Bill thinks that Beth is a genius. • Sue suspects that Bill thinks that Beth is a genius. • Charlie said that Sue suspects that Bill thinks that Beth is a genius. • Jean knows that Charlie said that Sue suspects that Bill thinks that Beth is a genius. • ad infinitum... • Some “real” examples:

  24. How many rules do we need? • X verbs that Y is a Z. • W verbs that X verbs that Y is a Z. • V verbs that W verbs that X verbs that Y is a Z. • and so on… • Q: Can we store all these patterns in our heads? • A: No, because no matter how many we store, there is always a longer one… • So how do we know all of these sentences?

  25. Language is Recursive • Recursive = involving a procedure that can refer to itself. • In language, rules for producing sentences can be used in rules for producing sentences. • Humans have to know rules of the following kind: • [Sentence] = X verbs that [Sentence]

  26. Language Model #3 • Jackendoff: “We know not just patterns of words, but patterns of patterns.” • This is how we can be infinitely creative with a finite set of rules. S = X likes Y. S = A X is not a Y. S = X verbs that S.

  27. Check it out • Included among the infinite number of things we can say is a lot of complete nonsense. • Examples (from Chomsky and Lewis Carroll): • Colorless green ideas sleep furiously. • I’m memorizing the score of the sonata I hope to compose someday. • ‘Twas brillig, and the slithy toves • Did gyre and gimble in the wabe… • Check out the postmodernism generator: • http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/

  28. What’s the difference? • Nonsense sentences work because they fit in with the patterns formed by the sentences that actually do make sense. • (and that we use every day) • Compare with the following: • Large green lizards sleep soundly. • I’m memorizing the score of the sonata I hope to perform someday. • ‘Twas evening, and the slimy toads • Did squirm and wiggle in the cage…

  29. What’s the difference? (part 2) • But the following sentences don’t work at all: • Green sleep ideas furiously colorless. • I’m memorizing the perform of the score I sonata to hope someday. • Brillig and, slithy and the toves • Wabe gimble in the gyre and did… • Note: just because we can say an infinite number of things, we can’t just say anything…

  30. Technical Terminology • The set of rules that we know for creating sentences in a language is the grammar of that language. • The rules of grammar that we know are very abstract. (patterns of patterns) • Strings of words which do not adhere to these rules are ungrammatical. • Q: If these rules are so abstract, how did we figure out what they are? • How do we learn language?

  31. Beneath the Surface • Note: we learn the language that we hear as we grow up, but… • We never hear the rules. • We can only learn from examples. • Our knowledge of language is sub-conscious. • Analogy: driving a car. • This knowledge is difficult to characterize. • (It is not explicitly taught to us.)

  32. How is that possible? • Theory: language acquisition is so hard that we can’t do it by just observing other language users. • (we need help) • Claim: every human being has a “Language Acquisition Device” (LAD) • LAD = innate knowledge of language. • The LAD helps us learn language as we grow up. • Interacts with experience.

  33. Predictions • The LAD theory makes some important predictions. • Universal Grammar (UG) • All languages should share certain features in common • …due to the workings of LAD. • A basic example: • All languages have nouns and verbs. 2. Poverty of the Stimulus • There should be properties of language that people “know” without ever having experienced them.

  34. A More Complicated Example • How do you turn the following sentence into a yes/no question? • The boy who is sleeping is dreaming of a new car. • = Is the boy who is sleeping dreaming of a new car? • Not: *Is the boy who sleeping is dreaming of a new car? • “The boy” is linked to the second “is”. • Kids understand this connection without ever being taught about the link. • They never form the question the wrong way. • Think: baby turtles crawling towards the ocean.

  35. Recursion • Recursion = another universal property of language? • which is unique to humans? • (Noam Chomsky thinks so.) • Remember, recursion = • involving a procedure that can refer to itself. • Ex: an English sentence may consist of: • [Noun] [verbs] that [sentence]. • With this rule, we can make sentences like: • Jean knows that Charlie said that Sue suspects that Bill thinks that Beth is a genius. • Sentences like this could be infinitely long…

  36. Limited Infinities • However: there are limitations on how much we can remember. • This means that a sentence like: “I don’t know if Ross suspects that Monika thinks that Chandler hopes that Joey supposably believes that Phoebe heard that…” • couldn’t really go on forever. • Check out another kind of recursion: • The boy scared Mary. • The boy that the dog bit scared Mary. • How about: • The boy that the dog that the cat scratched bit scared Mary. (?!?)

  37. Competence vs. Performance • An important distinction: • Linguistic Competence: • What a (native) speaker knows about a language. • Linguistic Performance: • How language is actually used in speech production and comprehension. • Word strings that are ungrammatical violate the rules of linguistic competence. • Other strings are impossible to say (or understand) because of performance limitations.

  38. Performance Problems • Note: it is not impossible for native speakers of a language to make mistakes. • Ex.: slips of the tongue. • You have hissed all my mystery lectures. • = You have missed all my history lectures. • My wife made me some banana bed yesterday. • = My wife made me some banana bread yesterday. • Stammering, pauses, hesitations. (George Bush-isms, Barack Obama’s Presidential oath, etc.) • What matters (for grammar) is not what you actually do so much as what you think about what you do.

More Related