1 / 56

Social Psychology

Social Psychology. What is Social psychology?. The field of psych pertaining to how we think about other people, interact in relationships and groups, and are influenced by others

Télécharger la présentation

Social Psychology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Social Psychology

  2. What is Social psychology? • The field of psych pertaining to how we think about other people, interact in relationships and groups, and are influenced by others • Scientific study of how people’s thoughts, feelings, and behavior are impacted by the actual, imagined, or implied presence of others • The study of social situations, with special attention to how we view and affect others

  3. Topics in Social Psychology • Person Perception & Attribution • Stereotypes & Prejudice • Social Influence • Attraction/Love • Close Relationships (my area of research) • Behavior in Groups • Helping Behavior • Aggressions • Attitudes • The Self

  4. Person Perception • Perception • Mental grasp of objects through the senses • Object of interest in social psych is the person • Impression Formation • What info do we use when making judgments? • Appearance • Age, gender, ethnicity • Attractiveness • Behavior • Information from others

  5. Biases in Judgment • Implicit Personality Theory • People assume that certain aspects or traits go together • Halo effect: We assume people we like have good characteristics, even if we haven’t seen them • Self-concept bias • What we consider important in ourselves is often what we consider important in others • Primacy effects • People are influenced more by info they receive early in an interaction than by info that appears later • We will even re-interpret new information so that it fits our earlier impression of people

  6. Attribution Processes • The process of asking “why” people do what they do • We do this for unexplained or unexpected events • Kelley’s covariation model • Consensus • Do other people react in the same way as the target? • Consistency • Does the target react in the same way to this stimulus on repeated exposures? • Distinctiveness • Does the target react the same way to similar stimuli?

  7. Kelley’s Covariation Model

  8. Attributional Errors • Fundamental Attribution Error • A tendency to overestimate the impact of personal causes of behavior and to overlook the role of situations • Actor-Observer Bias • More likely to make external attributions for our own negative behavior and internal attributions for others’ negative behavior • Vice versa for positive behavior (though this tendency isn’t as strong)

  9. Stereotypes • If we use schemas to form overall impressions of others because we are cognitive misers… • Stereotypes: group schemas, containing a set of beliefs about people in a particular social category • Devine (1989) • Automatic activation of stereotypes • CAN be controlled, when our personal beliefs (either positive or negative) of a social group are not aligned with the automatic stereotypes

  10. Origins of Prejudice • Socialization • We are not born with stereotypes, but we grow to imitate those who we respect • Realistic Group Conflict Theory • When groups are forced to compete for scarce resources (e.g., good jobs, nice homes, college educations), they threaten each other in a very negative manner • ‘Our group is better than yours’ becomes justification for greater access to these positive resources

  11. Ways to Reduce Prejudice • Allport’s Contact Theory • Under certain conditions, direct contact between members of different groups will improve relations • Contact must involve: • Mutual interdependence • A common goal • Equal status of groups • Informal, interpersonal contact • Multiple contacts • Social norms of equality

  12. Social Influence • Three types • Conformity • Compliance • Obedience • Conformity • The tendency for people to bring their behavior in line with group norms • Changing to match group’s standards

  13. Conformity • Informational Social Influence • The need to be right • Sherif (1936) autokinetic effect • Initially, P’s show a lot of variety in their answers but each group will create its own range

  14. Sherif (1936) autokinetic effect

  15. Conformity • Informational Social Influence • The need to be right • Sherif (1936) autokinetic effect • Initially, P’s show a lot of variety in their answers but each group will create its own range • Normative Social Influence • The need to be liked • Asch (1955) line study • 76% of the time, P’s will conform and give the wrong answer as well

  16. Compliance • Doing something because someone asked us to • Two types • Commitment-based techniques • By getting us to commit to a small item, we are more likely to commit to larger items • Norm of Reciprocity-based techniques • We should do for those who have done for us

  17. Commitment-based Compliance • Foot in the Door • Small request (accepted) followed by larger (accepted due to initial commitment) • Low Ball • Once request is agreed to, the hidden costs of complying reveal themselves • Why do these work? • We like to think that our self-identity is consistent • Once we agree to this person on this topic, we like to maintain consistency and keep agreeing

  18. Norm of Reciprocity-based Compliance • Unsolicited Gift • March of Dimes address labels, paying participants in advance • You are providing them with something in the hope that they will reciprocate • Door in the Face • Initial large request (rejected) followed by a smaller request (accepted) • The requester has lowered their demands so you feel the need to reciprocate by giving in a little

  19. Obedience • Doing something because a legitimate authority figure asked us to • Stanley Milgram (1960’s) • The participant is the teacher, the confederate is the learner • If the learner makes an error, the teacher has to ‘shock’ him…with the level of shock increasing to dangerous and deadly levels • As the level of shock increases, the P can hear the learner is in obvious pain

  20. Obedience • Factors that increased/decreased obedience • Making subject feel more responsible for their behavior reduced obedience • Emphasizing pain of other subject reduced obedience • Increasing physical presence of legitimate authority figure increased obedience • Having other subjects stop obeying reduced obedience

  21. Attraction - Proximity • We like those we are close to both physically and functionally • Why does proximity work? • It increases familiarity • Often linked to similarity • It makes others more available • Cognitive consistency • It's easier to be around others who we like, therefore we feel a need to get along with people we see often

  22. Attraction - Familiarity • Simply seeing a person more frequently can increase our liking of that person • This only works if our initial reaction is either neutral or positive • Seeing a negative stimulus repeatedly simply makes us not like it even more • Why does familiarity work? • Repeated exposure increases recognition • We assume that familiar others are similar to ourselves

  23. Attraction - Similarity • Matching Principle • The tendency to choose similar partners • Friends • Social class, educational level, and religious backgrounds • Romantic partners • Age, social class, ethnicity, and religion • Why does the similarity effect occur? • Similar others are easier and more pleasant to be around • Expectancy-value Theory • Maybe we deliberately select people for their similarity to us • The reward for dating someone similar to us is high…but so is the probability that they will like us

  24. What does being physically attractive mean? • Beauty is in the eye of the beholder…for the most part • Walster et al (1966) Computer Dance study • Used a computer service to match people for blind dates (but they were really randomly assigned) • Physical attractiveness was the only significant predictor of liking

  25. What does being physically attractive mean? (cont.) • Halo effect of beauty • Attractive people are judged more favorably on other traits than are less attractive people • Pretty people are assumed to have better: • Social skills • Intellectual competence • Greater integrity and concern for others • Is it true? • Certainly not for intelligence or integrity but sort of for social skills

  26. Close Relationships Rusbult’s Investment Model ( + ) Satisfaction ( + ) Investments Commitment ( - ) Alternatives

  27. Violence • U.S. has highest murder rate in the world among developed countries • More than 15,000 murders every year • More than 92,000 reported rapes • More than 7 million reported violent acts overall • Every 5 minutes a child is arrested for a violent crime • More than 50% of 5th graders report being a victim of violence (70% of those have seen weapons used) • Guns kill an American child every 3 hours

  28. Aggression • Aggression • Behavior intended to injure another who is motivated to avoid it • Assertiveness • Behavior intended to express dominance or confidence • Assertiveness is not aggression

  29. Biological Theories • Aggressive impulses may be hereditary • Twin studies: • Correlations of aggression higher among monozygotic twins than dizygotic pairs • Aggression is associated with • Low levels of serotonin • High levels of testosterone • Activation of the amygdala can lead to aggressive behaviors (though it still depends on situational factors)

  30. Gender Differences in Aggression • Men use more physical, direct forms of aggression • Men’s aggression is more likely to do physical harm, and thus gets more attention • Girls and women use more indirect forms of aggression (e.g., spreading rumors). • There is no clear sex difference in reporting feelings of anger

  31. Gender Differences in Aggression • Provocation: The great equalizer? • Men are more likely to attack physically when unprovoked than women • What happens when people are irritated, frustrated, or threatened by another person? • Bettencourt & Miller (1996) • Conducted a meta-analysis of gender differences in aggression • Found that when provocation is involved, the typical gender difference in physical aggression is reduced or eliminated

  32. Physical Discomfort & Aggression • Heat • Humidity • Pain • Noxious fumes • Poverty • Crowding

  33. Media Violence • More TV sets in United States than toilets • Media consumption is #1 pass-time among Americans, particularly youth • 60%-70% of all TV programs contain violence • 70%-80% show no remorse, criticism, or penalty for the violence • By the time the average American child graduates from elementary school: • More than 8,000 murders • More than 100,000 other acts of violence (e.g., assaults, rape)

  34. Media Violence • More recently, video games have become kids’ favorite form of media • 90% of kids age 2-17 play regularly • Majority of popular games are violent

  35. Grand Theft Auto

  36. Mortal Kombat

  37. Media Violence • Since at least 1970, researchers have known of a link between violent media and aggression • Weakened inhibitions against violent behavior • Imitation of specific violent acts • Aggression primed as a response to anger • Desensitization to violence • Overestimation of prevalence of violence in real life

  38. Common Responses 1. “That’s all boloney. I play those games and I’ve never killed anyone.” 2. “Maybe there is an effect, but it’s really small and meaningless.” 3. “Actually, my friends and I feel better after blowing off steam playing video games.”

  39. Common Responses 1. “Not all who play violent games/watch violent media become killers.” • True. Not all smokers die of lung cancer, either. • The point is NOT whether exposure leads inevitably to criminal mayhem, but that the likelihood of aggression is increased

  40. 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 Aggression Helping Hostile Hostile Arousal Thoughts Affect Effects of VVGs(Bushman & Anderson, 2001) Findings from a meta-analysis Correlation with VVG Exposure

  41. Common Responses 2. “Effects are trivially small” • False. Effects are larger than many that we take for granted

  42. Common Responses 3. “Playing violent games/watching violence allows people to “vent” feelings of anger” • False. Watching violence or engaging in virtual violence increases aggression • Catharsis doesn’t work!

  43. Media Industry Response 1. The media is simply “holding a mirror to society.” • False. Real world is far less violent than the TV/Movie world. • 0.2% of crimes are murders; 50% of crimes on TV are murders • Average of 7 characters are killed on TV each night • If applied in reality, this proportion of murder would wipe out U.S. population in 50 days

  44. Media Industry Response 2. “We’re simply giving the public what they want.” • Maybe. But viewer interest is only one factor driving programming decisions • Societal violence can be considered a hazardous by-product • Also, most popular shows (Friends, Seinfeld, Bachelor) are not violent

  45. Media Industry Response 3. “Violence sells!” • False. TV violence significantly decreases memory for commercial messages • Bushman, 1998 • 19% of viewers will be less likely to remember an ad if it is embedded in a violent or sexually explicit show

  46. Prosocial Behavior (a.ka. Altruism) • Prosocial Behavior • Any act that helps or is meant to help others • It doesn’t matter what the helper’s motivation is

  47. Evolutionary Theory • Kin selection • Gene survival is more important than the individual’s survival • By helping our relatives, we are giving our genes a greater chance of surviving, even if it harms our own life • Parents behave more altruistically to healthy offspring to unhealthy ones (Dovidio et al., 1991)

  48. Social Exchange Theory • We want to maximize our benefits and minimize our costs • We examine the costs and rewards of helping and not helping • 3 rewards of helping • Reciprocity • They will owe us when we need help (or at least it eventually balances out) • Relieves distress • We don’t like to see others suffer • Social approval • Others like us more when we are viewed as helpful and increases our self-worth

  49. Gender and Helping • Women are universally perceived as kinder, more soft-hearted, and more helpful (Williams & Best, 1990) • But over 90% of Carnegie Hero awards go to men (for saving, or attempting to save, the life of another) • Women • Help those they already know • Help in nurturing ways involving long-term commitment • Men • Help strangers in emergency situations • Help in chivalrous, heroic ways

More Related