1 / 28

MIPAS comparison to MOHAVE campaign data: Temperature, water vapor, and ozone

MIPAS comparison to MOHAVE campaign data: Temperature, water vapor, and ozone. Gabriele Stiller, Ellen Eckert, Michael Kiefer, Maya Garc í a-Comas, and the IMK/IAA MIPAS-Envisat Team IMK-ASF, KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany IAA, CSIC, Granada, Spain. MIPAS measurement principle.

daria-hunter
Télécharger la présentation

MIPAS comparison to MOHAVE campaign data: Temperature, water vapor, and ozone

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MIPAS comparison to MOHAVE campaign data: Temperature, water vapor, and ozone Gabriele Stiller, Ellen Eckert, Michael Kiefer, Maya García-Comas, and the IMK/IAA MIPAS-Envisat Team IMK-ASF, KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany IAA, CSIC, Granada, Spain

  2. MIPAS measurement principle • IR limb emission spectrometer • Measures day and night • Altitude range 6 to 70 km (NOM); • 18-100 km (MA); 40-170 km (UA) • Pole-to-pole, > 1000 profiles/day • So far 30 trace species, • temperature and cloud • composition • 2002 – 2004: full spectral res., • vertical resolution 3.5 - 6 km • Since 2005: reduced spectral • resolution, vertical resolution • improved (2 - … km) • Scientific analysis of MIPAS data • at IMK/IAA • Please click on to add your Title MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  3. Data characteristics for T, H2O, and O3 Temperature Vertical resolution: 3.4 km @ 10 km to 1.9 km @ 40 km Horizontal resolution: 250km @ 10km to 400km @ 40 km Vertical resolution: 2.3km @ 20km to 4.1 km @ 40km Horizontal resolution: 200km @ 10km to 440km @ 40 km H2O Ozone Vertical resolution: 2.4km @ 20km to 3.5km @ 50km Horizontal resolution: 250km @ 10km to 400km @ 40 km Von Clarmann et al., AMT, 2009 MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  4. Method of comparison • Look for coincidences for each MIPAS profile within 1000 km and 4 h. • Build averages of profiles and differences. • If appropriate, convolve with averaging kernel of MIPAS to account for different vertical resolutions. • Presented in this talk: only closest coincidences per profile, in space or in time, and averages from the closest coincidences (comparison to and averages of all coincident profiles available as well). • No separation of day and night profiles for this talk (comparison for day and night profiles, respectively, available as well). • For instruments providing results for various integration intervals (LIDAR_TMF, STROZ, MIAWARA) we have usually used the nightly mean (all night) profiles (comparison to others available as well). • In all figures: Differences are MIPAS – correlative measurement; red curve = MIPAS, red error bars = MIPAS precision, green line = original correlative measurement, black line = correlative measurement convolved with MIPAS AVK, grey area = combined error bars (precision) MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  5. Temperature MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  6. Difference MIPAS – ECMWF for one day during MOHAVE-2009 campaign 20-40N/S: Low bias (< 3K) around 18 km, high bias (<2K) below 20S-20N: Lower than ECMWF around 15 km (<3K) MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  7. -1 K Temperature – Comparison to satellite data ACE AIRS MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  8. Temperature – comparison to LIDARS ALVICE LIDAR-STROZ MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  9. Temperature – comparison to LIDARS LIDAR-TMF ALVICE LIDAR-STROZ MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  10. -1 K Temperature – comparison to LIDARS LIDAR-TMF ALVICE TMF nightly means LIDAR-STROZ TMF-ECMWF MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  11. Temperature – comparison to frostpoint hygrometers CFH_JPL 3.10 CFH_JPL 3.20 FPH_NOAA MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  12. Temperature – comparison to sonde data RS92-JPL RS92-JPL RS92-GSFC MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  13. RS92-GSFC Temperature – comparison to sonde data RS92-JPL RS92-JPL Summary temperature comparsion: RS92-JPL • MIPAS temperatures are mostly within 1-1.5K compared to campaign instruments. • Comparison to AIRS and LIDAR-TMP hints towards an overall stratospheric low bias of MIPAS in the order of 1K. • Low bias of <2K around 18km confirmed. • Most instruments point towards a high bias of MIPAS below tropopause (1-2 K). RS92-GSFC MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  14. Water vapor MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  15. TMF all night CFH 3.20 STROZ all night Examples for water vapor comparison FPH_NOAA MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  16. Examples for water vapor comparison ctnd. ACE AIRS MkIV MIAWARA 24 h MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  17. FPH_NOAA FPH_NOAA CFH 3.20 AIRS STROZ all night TMF all night Overview average differences water vapor ACE WVMS ACE MkIV MIAWARA 24 h +0.6ppmv +0.3ppmv +0.5ppmv HP MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  18. Water vapor – comparison to sonde data and ALVICE RS92_JPL ALVICE v1.1 RS92_GSFC Have we done something wrong with the RS92 and ALVICE data? MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  19. Summary comparison water vapor • Due to non-LTE effects a comparison is meaningful below 50 km only; above 50 km, MIPAS has a well-known low bias of ≥ 1 ppmv. • The deviations are mostly well within the combined errors. But: • All stratospheric instruments hint towards a high bias of MIPAS around 45 km in the order of 0.3 to 0.6 ppmv (however within combined error except for WVMS). This might be a compensation for the low bias above, or due to temperature bias. • Immediately below the hygropause, MIPAS seems to be too high by about 0.2 to 0.6 ppmv (but mostly within combined error), possibly due to the temperature bias. • Farther below, differences between MIPAS and correlative measurements are oscillating, but overall MIPAS seems to be far too dry. This can be explained as a systematic sampling error: cloudy scenes and scenes with very high water vapor must be omitted by the retrieval, i.e. only relatively dry scenes are sampled by MIPAS. MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  20. Ozone MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  21. Stratospheric Ozone ACE AIRS Scaling of profile only? TMF strat all night MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  22. Stratospheric Ozone ACE AIRS Reference (MIPAS spectro-scopic data base, Band A + Band AB MIPAS spectroscopic data base, only Band AB MIPAS spectroscopic data base, only Band A HITRAN96, only Band AB HITRAN96, only Band A Scaling of profile only? Glatthor et al., ACP, 2007 TMF strat all night MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  23. Tropospheric ozone CFH_JPL 3.20 CFH_JPL 3.10 TMF trop all night FPH_NOAA MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  24. Summary comparison ozone • MIPAS stratospheric ozone is biased high by about 0.6-0.8 ppmv at the upper edge of the ozone maximum (~ 37 km), and tends to be high (although still within combined errors) at ~ 25 km and 43 km. • These biases are probably due to spectroscopic uncertainties ( improve selection of spectral signatures). Another explanation could be the temperature bias in this altitude range. • Comparison to AIRS: AIRS profiles seem to be scaled only (no change in profile shape). • MIPAS tropospheric ozone tends to be very high at lowermost end of the profile; deviations at altitudes above are < 100 ppbv. MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  25. Tk: MA/UA Only with TMF (355H_30min)‏ Max. Time Diff. = 4h Max. Distance Diff. = 1000km Examples of Individual profiles MA mode MA UA UA mode MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  26. O3: MA/UA Max. Time Diff. = 4h Max. Distance Diff. = 1000km TMF-Launches FPH-NOAA Max. Time Diff. = 8h Max. Distance Diff.=1000km MA mode (ngt)‏ MA mode (ngt)‏ UA mode (day)‏ MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  27. H2O: MA/UA Max. Time Diff. = 6h Max. Distance Diff. = 1000km Max. Time Diff. = 12h Max. Distance Diff. = 1000km WVMS MIAWARA MA mode MA mode UA mode UA mode MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

  28. Summary MA/UA mode Measurements every 10 days (not a lot of coincidences). • Temperature (TMF): 2-3K colder stratopause, ±1-2K in mesosphere and 2K (MA) and 10K (UA) in mesopause. • Ozone (FPH & TMF): too structured (regularization?), ±1ppmv (20-50km). • Water vapor (MIAWARA & WVMS): Excellent comparisons above 60 km (±0.3ppmv), USLM too structured, 0.5-1ppmv wetter in H2O stratospheric max. MOHAVE-2009 Workshop # 2, 18-21 October 2010, University of Bern / IAP, Bern, Switzerland

More Related