1 / 12

Barasa W. E, Ayieko P, Cleary S, English M

Improving the Quality of Care of Sick Children in District Hospitals in Kenya: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Barasa W. E, Ayieko P, Cleary S, English M. Background. Under 5 mortality continues to be a challenge globally

deiter
Télécharger la présentation

Barasa W. E, Ayieko P, Cleary S, English M

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Improving the Quality of Care of Sick Children in District Hospitals in Kenya: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Barasa W. E, Ayieko P, Cleary S, English M

  2. Background • Under 5 mortality continues to be a challenge globally • In Kenya the under 5 mortality rate needs to reduce by 50% to meet the MDG 4 target • The district hospital is an important avenue for delivering cost-effective child health interventions • The quality of care in these hospitals has however been found to be poor in Kenya • A multifaceted intervention to improve inpatient care in these hospital was tested and found to be effective. • We present here a cost effectiveness analysis of the intervention

  3. The Intervention

  4. Objectives and Methods Objectives • To determine the total economic costs of delivering ETAT+ • To assess the cost effectiveness of the intervention • To model the costs of scale up of ETAT+ to a national level Methods • A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) alongside a cRCT • Provider perspective • Horizon – 18 months (Sep 2006 – Apr 2008) • One way sensitivity analysis conducted on development & hotel costs, effectiveness and salaries

  5. Methods Sample sizes • Process of care: 1158 & 1157 at 18 months in intervention and control hospitals respectively • Resource use: 6199 & 5115 in intervention and control hospitals respectively Measuring costs • An ingredients approach • Costs of developing, implementing and treatment where evaluated Measuring effectiveness • Quality of care measured using process of care that span assessment, diagnosis and treatment

  6. Assessing Costs-Effectiveness • Intervention study not designed to measure mortality as a primary outcome • The ICER was defined as the incremental cost per % improvement in QoC • We also assessed likely cost per DALY averted estimates assuming plausible relative reductions in baseline inpatient mortality rate (7%) of between 1% and 10% • This corresponds to absolute reductions in mortality of between 0.07% and 0.7%

  7. Results: Intervention Costs Summary

  8. Results: Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio • The additional cost per 1 percentage improvement in quality of care (ICER) was US$ 0.78 per child admission

  9. Results: Estimated Costs of Scale-up • Total costs of scale-up are US$ 3,633,123.45

  10. Results: “What-If” Analysis

  11. ICERs of other Key Child health Interventions

  12. Discussions: Should ETAT+ be scaled up? • There is therefore a strong case to scale up ETAT+ amongst other MNCH interventions

More Related