1 / 14

Toward More Legitimate Bioethics Policy: Using the Methods of “Big Picture Bioethics”

Toward More Legitimate Bioethics Policy: Using the Methods of “Big Picture Bioethics”. Susan Dodds University of W ollongong Rachel Ankeny University of Sydney. Introduction: Big Picture Bioethics. Focuses on novel approaches to the ethical and political analysis of health policy-making

dinah
Télécharger la présentation

Toward More Legitimate Bioethics Policy: Using the Methods of “Big Picture Bioethics”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Toward More Legitimate Bioethics Policy: Using the Methods of “Big Picture Bioethics” Susan Dodds University of Wollongong Rachel Ankeny University of Sydney

  2. Introduction: Big Picture Bioethics • Focuses on novel approaches to the ethical and political analysis of health policy-making • Integrates diverse disciplinary perspectives (political philosophy, bioethics, feminism, law, history and philosophy of science), resulting in new bioethics methodologies • Comparative analyses of policy-making processes and content (Australia and Canada) • Co-investigators: Rachel Ankeny and Jason Grossman, University of Sydney, Françoise Baylis and Jocelyn Downie, Dalhousie University, (Fiona Mackenzie, RA and Kerry Ross, student researcher)

  3. BPB: Three Case Studies • Provision of publicly-funded health services (what should be recognised as legitimate diagnoses and appropriate treatments; what should be publicly funded ) • Governance of research involving humans (mechanisms and content) • Regulation of research on human embryos, human embryonic stem cells, and human cloning (whether, what, how, and content)

  4. Key Focal Points of ‘Big Picture Bioethics’ • the justification of policy processes that lead to regulation (or decisions not to regulate) • the conditions that contribute to the legitimacy of policy • the social and political context of issues • that we aren’t in ideal speech situations; that we aren’t all perfectly rational; and perhaps most importantly, that significant ethical, political, and social disagreements exist

  5. Two Approaches to Legitimacy • Rawlsian: Ultimately able to determine what our shared and overlapping values are; can achieve a level of consensus about matters in the political realm through a process of reflective equilibrium • Habermasian: Possibility of communication in principle, but leaves open the scope of the political (or public); through a process of seeking to deliberate towards an outcome, consensus may be possible

  6. Demands of Public Policy • Determinate (if not definitive) outcome • Public justifiability • Attending to the fact of ethical disagreement • Relative legitimacy: • Process viewed as open to concerns of all those affected • Those affected and policy makers are able to articulate why the policy is thought to be justified

  7. The Challenge of Deliberation (preconditions) • All those involved must ‘play the deliberation game’ • Deliberators need to be concerned for the common good and for reciprocity • Given these preconditions, cultures of deliberation must be developed rather than adversarial contest as well as grounds for acknowledgment of diversity • Public deliberation about areas of scientific research may require a level of skepticism re: “experts” who may have partial grounds for their views • A range of habits of public reasoning and public fora for debate, discussion, and dissemination of knowledge need to be fostered (esp. for oppressed groups)

  8. What is Bioethics as Usual? • Personal morality • Professional ethics • Institutional ethics • Application of normative ethical theory to health care and medicine • Principlism

  9. Problems • No agreement on foundational ethical assumptions • Reliance for legitimacy on consulting public opinion or reflecting public values • Reliance on experts and assumption of deficit model

  10. Alternative Approaches: Empirical Bioethics • Synthesis between ethical and social science perspectives • Social science methods used • Opinion polls/ surveys • Open-ended interviews • Focus groups/ citizen juries

  11. Challenges for Empirical Bioethics • Framing problems • Masking of underlying value systems • Pathologies of deliberation: • Polarisation • Strategic positioning • Cultures of “winning arguments”

  12. What’s New about BPB? • Compare current debates in political philosophy • Gutmann & Thomson: health policy deliberation • Dryzek: citizen juries on health allocation • Young: distinguishing justice and democracy; emphasis on inclusive processes

  13. Conclusions • BPB as an approach to policy process evaluation • Approach avoids assumptions about consensus (e.g., that it can be reached, that we have shared fundamental values, etc.) • Avoids pre-figuring particular roles, scope, or issues • Leaves open the question of whether legitimacy is always obtainable

  14. Big-Picture Bioethics Policy-Making and Liberal Democracy For further information Australian Research Council Discovery Project website http://uow.edu.au/arts/research/bigpicturebioethics/ • sdodds@uow.edu.au • rankeny@science.usyd.edu.au

More Related