1 / 14

Archival apocalypse now?

Archival apocalypse now?. National Archives, The Hague, 9 September 2019. Who are we? Short introduction What’s the goal? How would archiving work if we could start from scratch, with current knowledge and possibilities? Could it be smarter, more efficient, more creative? What's the plan?

dionysius
Télécharger la présentation

Archival apocalypse now?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Archival apocalypse now? National Archives, The Hague, 9 September 2019

  2. Who are we? • Short introduction • What’s the goal? • How would archiving work if we could start from scratch, with current knowledge and possibilities? Could it be smarter, more efficient, more creative? • What's the plan? • Presentation of a fictional worst case scenario. • Your possible solutions. There are no wrong answers! • Explanation of current methods and procedures for governmental information (‘the boring part’) • Conclusions

  3. What if… 2019 Hard Brexit 2021 Collapse of the EU 2022 Collapse of NATO 2024 Radicals in Belgium take power and seize nuclear weapons at military base of ‘Kleine Brogel’ 2025 Belgium invades The Netherlands

  4. Spring 2025 You have to plan quickly • Which information has to be saved? • Who decides what should be saved? • How should it be saved?

  5. Which information has to be saved? Your ideas

  6. Which information has to be saved? Appraisal and selection (‘waardering en selectie’) Main criteria • High level decision making • Crucial processes • Reports and plans • (Basic) registrations Result: retention schedules (‘selectielijsten’)

  7. Who decides what would be saved? Your ideas

  8. Who decides what would be saved? Three stakeholders: • Organization • Research / Cultural heritage • Citizen Strategic information deliberation (‘StrategischInformatieoverleg’) • Responsible (e.g. Chief Information Officer) • Archivist • Independent expert Result: ‘report of deliberations’, added to retention schedules

  9. How would it be saved? Your ideas

  10. How would it be saved? • Government organisations transfer records to archives (‘overbrenging’)… • National government: National Archives and Regional Historical Centres • Provincial government: Regional Historical Centres • Municipal government: Regional Historical Centres or municipal archives • …obligation after 20 years: plans to shorten this period to 10 years • Records should be (transferred) in ‘good, orderly and accessible condition’ (‘goede, geordende en toegankelijke staat’) Result: preservation, finding aids (‘inventarissen’), search engines

  11. Why should it be saved? Your ideas

  12. Why should it be saved? Archives law 1995: • no mention Archives decree 1995: • Value as part of the cultural heritage • Importance of information for the government, for evidence and justice seeking citizen and for historical research Selection goal 2010 (‘selectiedoelstelling’)

  13. Want to find out more? www.nationaalarchief.nl/archiveren/waardering-en-selectie

More Related