1 / 24

Professional Development Plan

Professional Development Plan. Sault Ste. Marie Public Schools Lincoln Elementary School 2009-2010. Staff Development. Curricular Instructional Support Instructional Infrastructure Staff Development Timeline Collaborative Team Building Roles Professional Development Training Guidelines.

dolph
Télécharger la présentation

Professional Development Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Professional Development Plan Sault Ste. Marie Public Schools Lincoln Elementary School 2009-2010

  2. Staff Development • Curricular Instructional Support • Instructional Infrastructure • Staff Development Timeline • Collaborative Team Building Roles • Professional Development Training Guidelines

  3. Curricular Instructional Support Lincoln School MEAP Data Four Areas of Deficit • 3rd Grade Reading • 4th Grade Writing • 4th Grade Reading • 4th Grade Math

  4. Category 07-08 School 07-08 District 07-08 ISD 07-08 State Level 1 15 (41.67%) 74 (49.01%) 226 (41.93%) 46216 (39.61%) Level 2 12 (33.33%) 58 (38.41%) 248 (46.01%) 54789 (46.96%) Level 3 8 (22.22%) 16 (10.6%) 58 (10.76%) 12634 (10.83%) Level 4 1 (2.78%) 3 (1.99%) 7 (1.3%) 3042 (2.61%) Number Met 27 (75%) 132 (87.42%) 474 (87.94%) 101005 (86.57%) Not Met 9 (25%) 19 (12.58%) 65 (12.06%) 15676 (13.43%) Total Students 36 151 539 116681 Reading MEAP Proficiency Report for Eastern Upper Peninsula ISD, Sault Ste. Marie Area Schools Lincoln School, 2007/2008 School Year - Grade 03

  5. Category 07-08 School 07-08 District 07-08 ISD 07-08 State Level 1 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.2%) 526 (0.45%) Level 2 16 (32%) 68 (42.24%) 187 (37.1%) 51783 (44.21%) Level 3 32 (64%) 89 (55.28%) 303 (60.12%) 63628 (54.32%) Level 4 2 (4%) 4 (2.48%) 13 (2.58%) 1195 (1.02%) Number Met 16 (32%) 68 (42.24%) 188 (37.3%) 52309 (44.66%) Not Met 34 (68%) 93 (57.76%) 316 (62.7%) 64823 (55.34%) Total Students 50 161 504 117132 Writing MEAP Proficiency Report for Eastern Upper Peninsula ISD, Sault Ste. Marie Area Schools Lincoln School, 2007/2008 School Year - Grade 04

  6. Category 07-08 School 07-08 District 07-08 ISD 07-08 State Level 1 10 (20%) 47 (29.19%) 145 (28.94%) 37886 (32.37%) Level 2 28 (56%) 92 (57.14%) 273 (54.49%) 61159 (52.26%) Level 3 7 (14%) 16 (9.94%) 63 (12.57%) 14133 (12.08%) Level 4 5 (10%) 6 (3.73%) 20 (3.99%) 3848 (3.29%) Number Met 38 (76%) 139 (86.34%) 418 (83.43%) 99045 (84.64%) Not Met 12 (24%) 22 (13.66%) 83 (16.57%) 17981 (15.36%) Total Students 50 161 501 117026 Reading MEAP Proficiency Report for Eastern Upper Peninsula ISD, Sault Ste. Marie Area Schools Lincoln School, 2007/2008 School Year - Grade 04

  7. Category 07-08 School 07-08 District 07-08 ISD 07-08 State Level 1 16 (32%) 80 (49.69%) 196 (38.66%) 48315 (41.02%) Level 2 25 (50%) 64 (39.75%) 250 (49.31%) 52946 (44.95%) Level 3 7 (14%) 13 (8.07%) 45 (8.88%) 13810 (11.73%) Level 4 2 (4%) 4 (2.48%) 16 (3.16%) 2711 (2.3%) Number Met 41 (82%) 144 (89.44%) 446 (87.97%) 101261 (85.97%) Not Met 9 (18%) 17 (10.56%) 61 (12.03%) 16521 (14.03%) Total Students 50 161 507 117782 Math MEAP Proficiency Report for Eastern Upper Peninsula ISD, Sault Ste. Marie Area Schools Lincoln School, 2007/2008 School Year - Grade 04

  8. 2009 – 2010 Reading and Writing Activities and Action Plan

  9. Activities • Staff Meetings • MEAP line item analysis & disaggregation • WriteSteps - 1st – 5th Grades purchase, implementation & training Gr.1-5 • Treasures – Supplemental Reading Texts • Michigan Reading Recovery Conferences • Staff Training on new technology • MiBLSi – Michigan Integrated Behavior Learning Support Initiative In-services & Training • Monthly Grade level collaboration ½ day time and subs required

  10. Action Statement 1:Staff will use the MEAP line item analysis data to re-evaluate the plan on a yearly basis. Action Statement 2:Reading Recovery Teacher will evaluate the lowest achieving (bottom 20%) first-grade students. Action Statement 3:Staff will present students with explicit directives and guidance regarding setting up a writing selection. Action Statement 4:Staff will have a daily language arts block. Action Statement 5: Staff will utilize the writing guidance from the Language Arts Curriculum. Action Statement 6:Staff will use reciprocal teaching with their students (summarizing, questioning, clarifying, predicting). Action Statement 7: Staff, with support from the Intervention Specialist, will utilize Positive Behavior Support. Action Statement 8: Staff will guide students through the writing processes. Action Statement 9: Staff will familiarize students with a writing rubric. Action Statement 10: Students will utilize Odyssey writing components. Action Statement 11: Staff will utilize formative assessments throughout their units of instruction. Action Statement 12: Staff will maintain regular communication with Parents. Language Arts Action Plan

  11. 2009-2010 Mathematics Activities and Action Plan

  12. Activities • Staff Meetings • MEAP Line Item analysis and disaggregation • Staff training on new technology • MiBLSi – Michigan Integrated Behavior Learning Support Initiative In-services & Training • Monthly Grade level collaboration ½ day – time and subs required • Compass Lab updates

  13. Action Statement 1:Staff will use the MEAP line item analysis data to re-evaluate the school improvement plan on a yearly basis. Action Statement 2:Staff will have a daily math block. Action Statement 3:Staff will utilize the Math Curriculum and align their instruction to the curriculum timeline and map for their grade level. Action Statement 4:Staff will use reciprocal teaching with their students (summarizing, questioning, clarifying, predicting.) Action Statement 5: Staff will teach students the required math vocabulary. Action Statement 6:Staff, with support from the Intervention Specialist, will utilize Positive Behavior Support. Action statement 7:Staff will use formative evaluations throughout their teaching units. Action statement 8: Students will utilize Odyssey math components. Action statement 9:Staff will provide regular communication to Parents. Mathematics Action Plan

  14. Instructional Infrastructure 2009-2010

  15. Skyward Computer-Based Grade Reporting ADOPTION

  16. Spring ’09 - Survey Current Technology and Upgrade Where Necessary Spring ’09 - Adopt Skyward Electronic Grading System Spring ’09 - Establish Report Card Standards Grade-Level Meetings Spring ’09 - Establish Common Grading Scales and Progress Reporting Factors Summer ’09 - Technology Data Entry Fall ’09 - Train Instructional and Non-Instructional Staff Fall ’09 - Establish Parent Education Plan Instructional Infrastructure Implementation

  17. Staff Development

  18. Staff Development

  19. Staff Development

  20. Training/Professional Development Timeline Reading/Writing Goals • Spring ’09 - MEAP line item analysis & disaggregation • Spring ’09 - Staff Training on new technology • Summer/Fall ’09 - WriteSteps - 1st – 5th Grades purchase, implementation & training Gr.1-5 • Winter ’10 - Michigan Reading Recovery Conferences • Monthly Grade level collaboration ½ day time and subs required

  21. Training/Professional Development Timeline Mathematics Goals • Spring ’09 - MEAP line item analysis & disaggregation • Spring ’09 - Staff Training on new technology • Fall ’09 - Compass Lab updates • Monthly Staff Meetings • Monthly Grade level collaboration ½ day time and subs required

  22. Collaboration Grade-Level Teams Focus Points • Guaranteed and viable curriculum • Pacing guide alignment • Common assessments • Analysis of results; evidence of student learning • Plans for improving results • Focus on student learning • Peer coordination

  23. Collaborative Grade-Level Team Building Focus • Raise instructor level of concern • Empower staff to make decisions regarding instruction • Utilize instructor prior positive instructional experiences • Cultivate developmental readiness to learn • Orientation of topics to relevancy of instructors • Motivate adults with use of peer and external motivators

  24. Professional Development Training Guidelines • Must deepen knowledge of content and how to teach it to students • Help instructor to understand how students learn • Utilize hands-on principles • Instructors acquire, apply, and reflect new knowledge with peers • Is part of building instructional plan • Promotes collaboration and collegiality • Is intensive by nature and sustainable over time

More Related