1 / 19

Capitalizing on Untapped Potential

Capitalizing on Untapped Potential. An Effective Collaboration Strategy for the Great Lakes Region. Blue Eh? Consulting Ltd. Agenda. Introduction Strategic Context Viable Options Recommended Option Conclusion & Questions. What is the Great Lakes Region?. Two provinces: Ontario & Quebec

duante
Télécharger la présentation

Capitalizing on Untapped Potential

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Capitalizing on Untapped Potential An Effective Collaboration Strategy for the Great Lakes Region Blue Eh? Consulting Ltd.

  2. Agenda • Introduction • Strategic Context • Viable Options • Recommended Option • Conclusion & Questions

  3. What is the Great Lakes Region? • Two provinces:Ontario & Quebec • Eight States: Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin • Five Great Lakes

  4. What is the Great Lakes Region? • Economic Powerhouse • $4.6 trillion USD in economic output • Cross-border trade in this region sustains 2 million jobs • Rich in Human Capital • Population of 105 million • 20/100 of world’s top research universities • Diverse Ecosystem • 21% of world’s freshwater stores • 84% of North American

  5. Strategic Context • The presence of an international border creates a competitive disadvantage with respect to economic growth and environmental stewardship in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Region. • We propose a model of mature collaboration through the creation of a Great Lakes Partnership Council (GLPC) to strengthen prosperity and partnerships in the Great Lakes Region.  

  6. Untapped Potential • Gap in leadership, knowledge sharing and advocacy • 400 separate regulations affecting cross-border trade and 5,000 annual changes • Lack of partnership facilitation and ongoing support in variety of economic sectors, including manufacturing • Ineffective cross-border advocacy and collaboration on blue economy,water stewardship and conservation • Weak and uncoordinated voice

  7. Policy Need • Key Requirements • To improve region's social, economic, and environmental future by addressing collaboration gaps in leadership, advocacy, and knowledge sharing.   • Develop and champion short-term initiatives/projects; develop a long-term vision. • Assumptions • The region is ready for a model of government-led regional collaboration. • Current and Potential Constraints • No binding authority for legislative decision-making • Cross-border trade in this region sustains 2 million jobs

  8. Function of GLPC To foster a mature collaborative region, the GLPC will: • Create and maintain inventory of regional work • Turn bigger goals into smaller, more manageable goals • Create opportunities for interactions among leaders • Find resources/redistribute resources • Report outcomes

  9. Options • Maintain Status Quo • Implement a State/Provincial governance model • Private Sector Delivery • Hybrid Public-Private Model

  10. Option Analysis Strengths Weaknesses Option 2: State/Provincial Model Option 3: Private Sector Delivery

  11. Option 4: Hybrid Public-Private Model • Combination of private and public advocacy and participation • In addition to government participation, includes a Private Sector Board of Directors, made up of 4 members from each state/provincial jurisdiction as selected • Council Seats: industry leaders, public leaders, NGOs, • Funding provided from a variety of sources; reduces risk of long-term funding issues • Cost: 1.5 million/year Strengths Weaknesses

  12. Recommended Option Hybrid Model: Public/private • Deciding Factors • Need for input from all stakeholders E.g. Civic, public, private • Diversified funding portfolio • Costs Rough operating cost of $1.5m with projected growth in expenditures of about 5-10% per year • Risks Possible free-rider issue, need to ensure incentives for dues payment

  13. Implementation • Organization: • Issues-based Working groups • Steering Committee • Accountability: Annual Report  financial analysis, successes, lessons learned, improvement • Membership: Cross-stakeholder council seats • Public (multi-level - state/provincial, local, etc.); private (cross-industry); civic • Management: Annual business plans; long-term strategic plan • Evaluation: Neutral third party evaluation team

  14. Evaluation • Outcomes • Economic • Employment / Jobs • Number of jobs created • Success rate of businesses    engaged in cross-border trade • Production • Manufacturing output • Regional GDP • SMEs • surveys of businesses regarding ongoing cross border issues • Environment • Water quality • Air quality • Public health indicators • access to primary care • nutritional needs/food costs Organization: • Issues-based Working groups • Steering Committee • Accountability: Annual Report  financial analysis, successes, lessons learned, improvement • Membership: Cross-stakeholder council seats • Public (multi-level - state/provincial, local, etc.); private (cross-industry); civic • Management: Annual business plans; long-term strategic plan

  15. Cost-Benefit Analysis

  16. Cost/Benefit analysis Costs: Approximately $1.5m per year in operating costs, projected to increase by approximately 5-10% per year Benefits: Regional GDP is $4.6tn – an increase of even .1% results in benefits of hundreds of millions of dollars

  17. Communications Three phase communications strategy • Identify and engage stakeholders • Implement external communications plan • Sustain communication

  18. Multiple Stakeholders, Multiple Messages

  19. Communications Evaluation • Internal evaluation of public interest, stakeholder opposition • Develop feedback mechanism to shape and improve future communication strategies

More Related