1 / 16

Mega-Projects Cross Case Analysis

Mega-Projects Cross Case Analysis. Group B Jonas, Nina, Abdul, Paul i n C ooperation with George. Overview. 1. Research Question 2. Methodology 3. Results 4. Answers to Research Questions. 1. Research Question. Starting Point. RQ: Why do Megaprojects perform like they do?

enrico
Télécharger la présentation

Mega-Projects Cross Case Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mega-ProjectsCross Case Analysis Group B Jonas, Nina, Abdul, Paul in Cooperation with George

  2. Overview 1. Research Question 2. Methodology 3. Results 4. Answers to Research Questions

  3. 1. Research Question Starting Point RQ: Why do Megaprojects perform like they do? RQ: What can we do to make them perform better?

  4. 2. Methodology Approach for Working Plan • Eisenhard’s Multi Case Study Process: 8 Steps 5. 6. 4. 7. 8. 3. 1. 2. Getting started Selecting Cases Crafting Instruments and Protocols Entering the field Analysing data Shaping Hypothesis Enfolding Literature Reaching Closure already completed to be done in future • Analysing data • Within-case analysis • Cross-case pattern search using divergent techniques • Shaping Hypothesis • Iterative tabulation for each construct • Replication logic across cases • Search evidence for “why” behind relationships Group Work

  5. 2. Methodology Working Plan and outcomes WORKING STEPS OUTCOMES Initial thoughts on dimensions of performance • Definition of performance as factors influencing: a) goals, b) outcomes and c) outputs (time, cost, quality) 1. Analysing data • ~ 25% of cases covered 2. Get familiar with cases (1-2 per person) • Check themes/patterns across the first sample 3. Identify common themes/patterns inductive Shaping Hypothesis 4. Test, expand, reduce number of themes/patterns by analysing more cases • Saturation • Hypothesis deductive/ inductive Conclude answers to RQ 1 Derive recommendations answer RQ 2

  6. 2. Methodology Working Plan and outcomes

  7. 3. Results Performance indicators Initial thoughts on dimensions of performance 1. Basic Model which Rodney refers to: Technical perspective on project delivery:(Time, Cost, Quality) Is the project/product used in the way it was developed for Is the origin purpose reached by/through the project?

  8. 3. Results First Cases analysed 2. Get familiar with cases (1-2 per person) Cases covered:

  9. 3. Results First collection of themes from cases 3. Identify common themes Themes from first case sample:

  10. 3. Results Identify more themes across cases 3. Identify common themes Themes from first case sample: Analysing further cases: total 11 Checking each theme through each of the cases: Additional themes:

  11. 3. Results Hypothesis support by cases 4. Test, expand, reduce number of themes/patterns by analysing more cases Green: > 40%; Yellow: 20% <x> 40% Attention: rethink the No’s

  12. 4. Answers to Research Questions Conclude answers for RQ 1: 1. RQ: Why do Megaprojects perform like they do? Conclude answers to RQ. 1 From negative direction of statements

  13. 4. Answers to Research Questions Conclude answers for RQ 1: 1. RQ: Why do Megaprojects perform like they do? Conclude answers to RQ. 1 From negative direction of statements Prices increase during project duration Use of complex and innovative technology Strong negative influence by environmentalists group Regulations change during project duration

  14. 4. Answers to Research Questions Conclude answers for RQ 1: 1. RQ: What can we do to make them perform better? Conclude answers to RQ. 2 From positive direction of statements

  15. 4. Answers to Research Questions Conclude answers for RQ 2: Derive recommendations answer RQ 2 From positve direction of statements

  16. 4. Discussion Next steps: • Steps to improve results: • Analyse rest of cases • Rethink “no’s”

More Related