1 / 13

Literacy Program Analysis

Literacy Program Analysis. Carolyn Townsend. Introduction. Many Lakes School District Jordan Middle School Documents used: K-5 Elementary Framework Secondary Framework Interviews with District reading consultant Middle school reading teacher. District Statistics. Makeup

Télécharger la présentation

Literacy Program Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Literacy Program Analysis Carolyn Townsend

  2. Introduction • Many Lakes School District • Jordan Middle School • Documents used: • K-5 Elementary Framework • Secondary Framework • Interviews with • District reading consultant • Middle school reading teacher

  3. District Statistics • Makeup • 18 elementary schools • 18 K-8 programs • 4 middle schools • 7 high schools • Alternative and charter programs • Apx 35,000 students • 70% are Students of Color • 23% are ELL students • Average of 54% of all students met or passed the standards on the MCA II test in reading

  4. Literacy Goals • Defined district wide as including reading, writing, listening, speaking and viewing in a balanced approach. • Based on State and Core standards, and on the Principals of Learning • District has developed a K-5 framework and a secondary framework to define what the literacy program is and how it should be structured at the district, building and classroom levels.

  5. Curriculum • Elementary: • Readers Workshop, 60-90 minute block • Whole group instruction • Small group instruction • Closure activity • Writers Workshop, 30-45 minute block • Same as Readers Workshop • Skills Block, 30 minute block • Whole group direct instruction • Integrated into core subjects

  6. Curriculum • Secondary • Meets each day for a 60 minute block on average in most MS and HS • Middle School • Independent reading • Readers and Writers Workshop • Read 180 • High School • Daily independent reading • Use of district and teacher generated curriculum • Readers and Writers materials are in the ELA classes • Achieve 3000

  7. Analysis and Evaluation • Literacy Goals: • Balanced approach designed around evidenced and research based best practices • Uses Principles of Learning to include • Academic rigor • A thinking curriculum • Project based assessment • Scaffolded instruction for gradual release of student learning to the student

  8. Analysis and Evaluation • Curriculum • Uses authentic activities through inclusion of students in choice of reading materials, student goal setting and self monitoring • Teacher role is to • Assess what students need, develop and implement a curriculum that meets those needs

  9. Instructional Practices • Professional Development • Content Focused Coaching • 1 coach per elementary site • 1 coach per middle school site, or use of several coach/reading teachers • No coaches at the high schools • District provided pdonly; funding cut this year • May include a literacy committee on site

  10. Instructional Practices • District wide Independent Reading program • 20 minutes per day required in elementary, MS and HS reading classes • Use of Technology • Read 180 • Achieve 3000 • Rubicon Atlas database for teacher and specialist generated curriculum sharing • Moodle classes for teacher generated and blended delivery of some reading curriculum • Reading logs • Readers Notebooks • Reading discussions

  11. Readers Notebook Moodle

  12. Readers Notebook Moodle

  13. Suggestions for Improvement • Secondary Reading Program • Three year old program in place in only 4 schools • Little support, or materials • Focused on 9th and 10th grade for test prep, despite efforts to change that. • Requires more emphasis and funding at the District level. • Elementary • Framework has too little inclusion of various grouping models • There may be an assumption that teachers know this • Framework design is well done, but left to the teachers to implement. • Plan is viewed by some staff as too comprehensive, too inclusive • Leads to little buy in by some staff.

More Related