1 / 21

Panel Data and Qualitative Responses: Understanding Perceptions of Quality of Life

Panel Data and Qualitative Responses: Understanding Perceptions of Quality of Life. Jackie Scott & Jane Nolan & Anke Zimmermann University of Cambridge. EU Interest in Wellbeing and QoL.

Télécharger la présentation

Panel Data and Qualitative Responses: Understanding Perceptions of Quality of Life

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Panel Data and Qualitative Responses: Understanding Perceptions of Quality of Life Jackie Scott & Jane Nolan & Anke Zimmermann University of Cambridge

  2. EU Interest in Wellbeing and QoL • European Social Survey (ESS) seeks to develop measures that will allow us to assess EU aim of “promoting.. the wellbeing of its people” • Distinction between objective & subjective wellbeing • Distinction between personal vs social or relational wellbeing • Distinction between having (feeling) & doing (functioning) eudaimonic/hedonistic (Aristotle)

  3. Conceptual developments • Sen and capability (person’s life combines doing and beings i.e. functionings; • capabilities refer to various combinations of functionings that a person can choose to have). Realisable opportunity; • Not utility based • Not individualistic

  4. Perceptions of Q o L • Quality of life is both an ‘experience distant’ and ‘experience near’ concept (Clifford Geertz, interpretive anthropology ) • According to THES/Halifax quality of life index – Oxford 68th; Cambridge 28th; Bucks New Univ 1st (labour, housing, urban environ, physical environ, health, education & university environment) • People’s own views of Q o L important • Perceptions matter – what people perceive as real has real consequences (W I Thomas)

  5. In Praise of Panel Surveys • Research on change at level of individual (cf repeated cross-sections – can only look at aggregate change) • Change in context of household and other household members (e.g co-resident partners and children) • Change in context of changing individual and household resources – education, employment status, family structure, household income etc • Analysis of individuals over time • Compare how perceptions change for individuals who experience particular transitions e.g. form partnership, become parents, enter a job, retire etc

  6. Hypotheses (qualitative and quantitative) • Gender differences do different things matter to men and women?(quant) do men and women express similar concerns differently (qual) • Age differences do different things matter for different ages? (quant ) do people at different life stages interpret qol differently (qual ) • Timing & resources matter Does transition to parenthood change perception of qol? (qual) Does socio-economic status influence what matters over and above the influence of gender and age (quant)

  7. British Household Panel • The British Household Panel Survey began in 1991 and is a multi-purpose study whose unique value resides in the fact that: • It follows the same representative sample of individuals - the panel - over a period of years; • It is household-based, interviewing every adult member of sampled households; • It contains sufficient cases for meaningful analysis of certain groups such as the elderly or lone parent families; • The wave 1 panel consists of some 5,500 households and 10,300 individuals drawn from 250 postal areas of Great Britain.

  8. British Household Panel Study (1997 & 2002) Open-Ended Measure of Quality of Life • The final question asks you to think about things that are important to you. There is a lot of discussion these days about quality of life, yet that means different things to different people. Would you take a moment to think about what quality of life means to you, and tell me what things you consider are important for your own quality of life • (For each mention) In what way is that important to you?

  9. POSITIVE MENTIONS Personal characteristics good health freedom/independence happiness/peace of mind safety Time for self other personal Material characteristics Finances Consumption Home comforts Employment Car, transport Education Other material Leisure ……….. …… Spiritual/Moral/Community Aspects …………. Other People including pets ………….. Aspects of Locality and Environment NEGATIVE MENTIONS Need better personal characteristics, less worry, better health… Need better material characteristics.. More money, better job …. More leisure/recreation More morality/spiritual/community spirit …. etc …. Other negative mentions Quality of Life Main Codings

  10. Q of Life Main mentions (% of sample who mention) • Health 53% • Family 40% • Finance/standard of living 38% • Being happy 28% • Friends 20% • Home comforts 16% • Leisure/travel 15% • Employment 14% • Freedom 7% • Time for self 7% • Other material benefits 7% • Environment, community 7% • Other personal 6% • Spiritual, moral5% • Negative mentions 5% • Miscel Others 7% • Don’t know 1% NB Up to 4 mentions are coded so % exceeds 100% (mentions taken from 1997 (N = 9047); similar pattern of mentions in 2002)

  11. % Mentions of health by age & gender

  12. Qualitative difference in health mentions by age & gender • Younger people (under 50) give generic health mentions e.g. ‘if you haven’t got your health you can’t do anything’ • Older people (50+) mention specific ailments or declines & importance of ‘marbles’ and ‘mobility’ • Older people mention significant other’s health having direct bearing on own wellbeing e.g. ‘I haven’t got any QoL at moment, as my husband has Alzheimer’s • Younger people also cite relational aspect of health emphasising that their own QoL is bound up with health of immediate family

  13. Mentions of family by gender, age & whether or not married/partnered

  14. Qualitative difference in family mentions by age & gender • Women more likely than men to mention family at all age groups • Mentions of family highest for people through to mid adulthood (under age 46) • Young people mention dependence on families for moral & financial support • Gender role differences in caring vs breadwinning role, women emphasise importance of kids wellbeing & men secure job in order to provide for family needs “If they’re happy I am happy” characteristic female response (although some men too) • Work-life balance issues often coincide with family mentions, but what balance means is gendered • For men ‘balance’ tends to be where the heavy burdens of work are off-set by time with family e.g. “ I’m always stressed at work – its nice to turn off and relax at home” • For women, greater variation in how balance regarded (Hakim, but with resource constraints, work skills, education, child care etc)

  15. In general, finance mentions concern having sufficient money not to worry and to be fairly comfortable Rampant materialism and consumerism is notable by its absence Men more likely than women to emphasise breadwinner role ie earning decent wage to support family Relatively few older people (65+) mention finance (nb very few people mention negative code – ‘qual of life’ has positive nuance) Qualitative difference in finance mentions by age & gender

  16. Family formation & Changing evaluations of Q o L • Importance of well being of others for Q o L • Other orientation varies depending on life-stage • Family formation key transition • Sub-sample - single & under age 40 in 1997; with kid in 2002

  17. Eleanor - giving up smoking, health generally, expanding my career, making myself money, my future generally.. (1997) - my son and a good family life: that’s all that’s important to me (2002) Mary - happiness and standard of living (1997) - health of my child and family, they’re my whole life, what would I do without them (2002) Carol - good friends and a steady income (1997) - being with family, see baby grow up and being with partner (2002) Exceptions – family mentions across both waves or in neither, but for most women clear shift in priorities Andrew - go out and enjoy myself (aged 26, partly skilled manual 1997) - to be comfortable, not struggling as we do at moment. If I could get a better job everything would be fine (unskilled manual aged 31) Billy - comfortable income, nice food, nice place to live, nice clothes and spending time with my girlfriend (aged 23 managerial and technical work 1997) - making a living to keep us all happy Ian - being able to go out and enjoy yourself (aged 29, 1997) - being with my family; they keep me happy and make me laugh (aged 34, 2002) Exceptions – some make no reference to others in responses after acquiring a family, but most men, like women emphasise wellbeing of others more when have family of their own What matters before & after kids

  18. Resources & Mentions of Q o L(provisional results from pooled logit, includes both waves) N=7996

  19. Methodological Lessons • Quality of life is perceived differently for men and women – difference shows up quantitatively but also qualitatively e.g. men and women have different conceptions of balance of work and family (this would be hard to get at without open-ended questions) • Quality of life is perceived differently for different age groups – but also transitions matter - people’s perceptions change when they experience particular life course transitions such as becoming parents. (this requires household panel data that follows same people across time) • Need to consider QoL as relational – ‘lives in convoy’ ( ‘natives interpretation’ (Geertz) different than expert indicators) • People more concerned with intimate lives rather than community/society (may reflect personal emphasis of question – even open ended questions are subject to ‘framing’ effects) • QoL process not state, need to examine stability & change over life course (panel data needed!!)

  20. ESRC Gender Equality Network Research Priority Network on Gender Inequalities in Production & Reproduction www.genet.ac.uk

More Related