1 / 56

Laser Propulsion and Space Based Solar Power

Keith Henson (L5 Society Founder). Laser Propulsion and Space Based Solar Power. Power down to Earth via lasers. What does this have to do with Transhumanism?. Running out . . . . Carbon problems. The Basic Idea. Build one power satellite the hard way. Equip it with propulsion lasers

finnea
Télécharger la présentation

Laser Propulsion and Space Based Solar Power

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Keith Henson (L5 Society Founder) Laser Propulsion and Space Based Solar Power

  2. Power down to Earth via lasers.

  3. What does this have to do with Transhumanism? Running out . . . . Carbon problems

  4. The Basic Idea • Build one power satellite the hard way. • Equip it with propulsion lasers • Bring up material to build hundreds using the first one. • Build more propulsion lasers as well. • Undercut/displace fossil fuels.

  5. Three years agoThree weeks agoWhat changed? Google China India Power Satellites

  6. Last week in the news . . .

  7. THE SABRE ENGINE

  8. HEAT EXCHANGER

  9. First SABRE Pre-cooler Module This was manufactured in 2004

  10. SABRE Pre-cooler Demonstration

  11. Can’t be done with chemical fuel • Current $20,000/kg to GEO • SpaceX $4,000/kg  $1,000/kg • 20t/1400t, 1.4% payload • Skylon ~$1000/kg  $500/kg • 7t/300t, 2.3% payload

  12. Hydrogen combustion to 25 km, & Mach 5.5 Laser heated hydrogen above that point (laser beamed down from GEO) • 2.3 to 3.4 GW of laser • Performance analysis, 54 t to LEO • Vehicle 24 t, (20% structure) plus • 30 t second stage to LEO • 2/3rd of second stage to GEO (20 t)

  13. Growth: 100GW/year, ten percent (10 GW) used for more propulsion, triples the cargo capacity to 1.5 M t/y, 300 GW/year. Triple that and the expansion rate is almost a TW/year. It's possible that humanity could be mostly off fossil fuels in two decades. (Sandy is a factor.)

  14. End of talk http://hplusmagazine.com/2012/04/12/transhumanism-and-the-human-expansion-into-space-a-conflict-with-physics/

  15. BUT—It is too big to do without major government backing • And oil, coal and gas industries will lobby against a real solution. (Maybe not) • So why should a government consider backing it?

  16. Payload Percent Ex Exhaust Velocity km/s

  17. Cost breakdown • Vehicle amortization $10/kg • Hydrogen $6/kg • Laser $50 B (written off in 5 years) • $10 B/0.5 B kg is $20/kg • $36/kg, well under the $100/kg number • Profit more than $50/kg

  18. Completing 2.3 to 3.4 GW • $ 34 B laser/power sat parts, 17,000 tons • 60 ¼ scale vehicles, 5 tons to GEO • 20 flights per day, 170 days, 2 years total • Transport cost @ $100/kg $1.7 B • Total cost $50-100 B • Income @ $100/kg * 500,000 t $50 B/yr • Payback from profit 3-4 years.

  19. Chemical rocket (and planes) can't build power sats but they can build a large, expensive laser • 3.4 GW electric power at 2 cent per kWh is worth $480 M/yr • 3.4 GW of laser propulsion is worth $50 B/yr • >100 times as much

  20. Part 4This makes a business case • It closes the business case for making 2 cent per kWh power and we know there is plenty of market at that price (TWs) • It solves energy, energy security and carbon problems (carbon neutral synthetic fuel for a dollar a gallon) • Even at two cents per kWh it makes huge profits to support growth.

  21. Simple analysis • 10 year return on capital, 80,000 hours • $1600/kW can be paid back at 2 cents per kWh (Below coal to get market share) • $200/kW rectenna, $900/kW parts and labor ($450 before transmission loss), $500/kW for transport to GEO • At 5 kg/kW requires • $100/kg or less to GEO

  22. It costs perhaps 10% of what a war with Iran would cost • SDI with the USSR or Russia was/is a losing business. • It will be decades before Iran could overwhelm a multi GW propulsion laser and by that time the commercial demand for laser propulsion should be in the tens of GW • Cheap power from space removes any legitimate reason to sort out uranium atoms

  23. Google “henson oil drum” for a slightly out of date “white paper” on this topic • Part 1 months ago • Part 2 and 3 a few weeks ago • Part 4 last week • This is unlikely to be the final evolution of the idea.

  24. Why Airdrop at 10 km • Large Landing gear reduction • Max landing is 54 tons, 120 t less 76 tons of LH2 dumped in an abort.

  25. OVERALL CONFIGURATION OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS SPS (FROM DOE STUDIES) SPACEBORNE ARRAY RECTENNA ON EARTH

  26. Percent payload (blue)GW x 10 (orange)

  27. 40 kg, but just scaling from MW to GW, move to Equator, cover mountain with gyrotrons, run 4 minutes out of 20, 11 million truck batteries, 5 years and they die, but in that time 500 GW of SBSP. Silly to send power down and back up so . . . .

More Related