Acquisition at the Air Armament Center

2. Acquisition at the Air Armament Center July Precision Strike Conference 2005 Air-to-Ground Munitions Systems Group Mr. Thomas Robillard, SES Director

3. Why Are We Here? Communicate What’s Going On With Precision Strike From An Air-to- Ground Munitions Systems Wing Perspective Learn From Each Other Desired Outcome Benefit From Cross-Talk Get More Effective At Joint Service Technology Transitions

4. Air Armament Center (AAC) • Provides Weapons And Combat Support Systems To AF, Navy, Army, And More Than 30 Countries • Air Armament Modernization Budget Is Consistently 2-3% Of Total AF Budget ~$300m Per Year (06 POM) • Laboratory, Acquisition Offices, Developmental And Operational Test Organizations Are Co-Located At The AAC AFMC / AAC MISSION Deliver War-winning Technology, Acquisition Support, Sustainment, And Expeditionary Capabilities To The Warfighter

5. AFMC /AAC Strategic Goals • Develop And Transition Technology To Maintain Air, Space, And Information Dominance • Develop, Field, And Sustain War-winning Expeditionary Capabilities On Time, On Cost • Provide Opportunities For Career Development And Progression • Operate Quality Installations And Ranges • Sustain A Healthy, Fit, Safe, And Ready Workface • Organize And Resource The Command To Improve Accountability And Increase Effectiveness • Achieve Agile Acquisition Through Speed And Credibility

6. Air-to-Ground Munitions Systems Wing (AGMSW) Joint Air Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) Small Diameter Bomb (SDB) Sensor Fuzed Weapon (SFW)

7. Air-to-Air Missile System Wing(AAMSW) Advanced Medium-Range, Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) Harm Targeting System (HTS) QF-4 Full Scale Target Sidewinder AIM –9X Air Force Sub-Scale Aerial Target (AFSAT) Miniature Air Launched Decoy (MALD)

8. Technology TransitionThe DoD 5000 Process Program Initiation or FOC IOC A B C S&T Activity System Development & Demo Technology Development Requirement Generation Concept Refinement Production & Deployment Operations & Support 6.1, 6.2, 6.3 Technology Readiness Level > 6 Top-Down Direction • SecDef • SecAF • CSAF Technology Transition Combatant Commander Needs • ATDs • ACTDs • Exercises • Experiments • Battlelab Initiatives • SPO Initiatives • Industry REQUIREMENTS • Integrated Priority List (IPL) • Urgent Need Requests Capability Based Planning • CONOPS • CRRA

9. Production & Deployment Operations & Support SD&D Who Does Technology Transition & Program Starts? Program Initiation FOC IOC A B C Requirement Generation Concept Refinement Technology Development Sustainment Acquisition Offices Pre-Systems Acquisition • AF Research Laboratory/Munitions Directorate • Technology Maturation • Integrated Concepts/Demos • Expertise • AAC/XR • Initial Program Cadres • Quick Reaction Programs • Guides S&T Investment Air-Ground Sys WG Air-Air Msl Sys WG Air Combat Sup Sys GP Air Logistic Centers Multi-service and International Stakeholders: Industry, Warfighters, Laboratories, Service, OSD Staffs, & Congress

10. The DoD 5000 Process For New Programs “Behind the Textbook” • Identify Technology That Provides Warfighter Additional Capability • Better And/Or Cheaper Than Current Inventory • Fills Capability Gap(s) • Assess Risk And Understand Technology Maturity • Conduct Risk Reduction, Concept & Technology Development Activities • Demonstrate Maturity • Develop Focused Story That Articulates Capability In Warfighter Terms • Lab, Industry, Acquisition Community Relay Story To Stakeholders • If Story Is Good, Funding And Direction Will Come • Acquisition Program Begins This Process works best when “PULLED” by capability needs and takes 5 years or more

11. JDAM Story • AFRL Inertial Guidance Technology Demonstration 1989-1990 • Gulf War – 1991 – Need For Accurate All-Weather Weapons $20M S&T Investment 1976-1993 JDAM TIMELINE Gulf War Generated Rqmt JDAM Low Rate Initial Prod Award JDAM Pre-EMD Award DEMO AFRL DEMO LRIP EMD Production MS I MS 0 MS III MS II 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 5 Years from Technology Demonstrations, 3 Years From Identified Need to Milestone I

12. JDAM Start-up • Competing Concepts • Technology Maturity Debates • GPS Technology Was New For Use In Weapons • Inertial Navigation Systems Were Expensive • Can You Make It Affordable For Large Quantity, Expendable Weapons? • Use/Reliability Of Autonomous Weapons • Existing Concepts Of Operations Were Based On Data Linked Weapons Or Carpet Bombing • Funding • Had To Marry Up With POM Cycle • Had To Sell New Acquisition Strategy – Promised Affordability • Cost Vice Performance Trades • Performance Specifications • Long Term Pricing Agreements

13. JDAM For OEF and OIF • Prior to 11 Sept 01 Attacks • 700 Units Per Month • Aircraft • Today • 2800 Units Per Month • More Aircraft Integrations - Smaller Bombs * Quick Reaction Capability Precision + Low Collateral Damage + Platform Flexibility in Months Vice Years NDIA Symposium_Feb 05

14. JDAM Today • Accuracy: Less Than 6 Meters • Cost: Less than 50% Original Estimated Unit Cost • Number Produced To Date: 104,320 • Number Used In Conflict: 15,180 ( AF: 11,570, Navy: 3,610 )

15. Small Diameter Bomb (SDB)

16. SDB Story • Aircraft Internal Bays Limit Number Of Weapons Carried • Increased Need For Near-zero Collateral Damage • Improved INS/GPS Accuracy Over Time Allowed For Smaller Weapons and Multiple Carriage SDB TIMELINE $64M S&T Investment 1994-2002 MMC MNS Signed • AFRL Tech Programs • Range Extension Demo • Powered Low Cost Autonomous Attack System (LOCAAS) • Carriage Demos • TMD MM Dispenser Contract Award MMC Seeker RR MMC AOA Production CAD SDD AFRL DEMO MS A MS B MS C MS 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 Years From Technology Demonstration, 3.5 Years From Identified Need to Milestone A

17. SDB Start-up • Challenges • Belief That Nothing Smaller Than 2,000 lbs Could Sufficiently Damage Targets • Bomb Damage Assessment – How Will We Know What Damage Was Incurred With Small Amount Of Explosive? • Worry That We Couldn’t Mission Plan That Many Weapons • Funding – 4 Years “Below-the-line” In POM • What Happened: • Lab, Industry, Acquisition And Warfighter Communities Collaboratively Built And Told The SDB Story • Lab Demo, Live Fire, B-2 With 80 500 lb JDAMS, … • Top-down Directed Funding For Program In FY01 & Out • 04 POM Fully Funded Baseline Program

18. Lessons Learned • Capabilities Needed In Actual Combat Drive Technology Transitions • Create Battlefield Effects With Near-zero Collateral Damage • Integrate Seamlessly Into Fully Joint Warfighting • Multitude Of Diverse Stakeholders Must Converge To Successfully Transition Technology • Industry, Warfighters, Service & OSD Staffs, Congress • Aircraft Integration Is The Slowest, Most Costly Driver • 5-8 Platforms (F-18 E/F, FA-22, JSF, B-2, B-52, F-15, F-16, B-1, UAVs)

19. Joint Programs "Now More Than Ever.....!!"

20. AAC/XR Roadmap Vision FYDP 2012 TODAY 2020 Hyper CM RNEP GBU-31 (BLU-109) GBU-28 (BLU-113) GBU-28C/B (BLU-122) JASSM/JASSM-ER MOP / CAV HDBT/UGF DE & HPM Weapons LGBs, JDAMs, PSOW, GP, CALCMs & Mavericks, JASSM/JASSM-ER SDB & SDB II LCMCM, CAV, Area Dominator Fixed Land GBU-12 B/B, Hellfire DE & HPM Microbots SDB, SDB II & JCM Low Collateral Damage WH Area Dominator & VSM Fixed Urban CBU-103/104/105s, LGBs, Longbow, & Mavericks DE & HPM Global Energy Projection SDB II, JCM, & CBU-105 ER w/DL LCMCM, WASAAMM, Area Dominator Moving Land SDB II, JCM, JASSM & CBU-105 Maritime DE Weapons ASSM (HSW) LCMCM, WASAAMM, Area Dominator Moving Sea LGB & Maverick

21. HARM BLK V Maverick HELLFIRE N78 1Q 2004 (POM 06) FYDP 2012 TODAY 2020 TACTOM (HSW) LR Standoff SLAM ER TLAM Blk III / TACTOM SLAM ER TLAM Blk III / TACTOM SLAM ER JSOW AARGM SDB II JSOW “A” and “C” JSOW “A” JSOW AARGM SDB II MR Standoff HARM BLK V and AARGM Maverick JDAM LGB JCM, APKWS GP Bombs JDAM JDAM JCM, APKWS GP Bombs Direct Attack JDAM 82, 83, 84 GBU 24, LGB LGB, GBU-24 2.75”/5.00” ROCKET, GP Bombs APKWS, GP Bombs JCM SDB II DA Moving/ MobileTarget JCM SDB II GP Bombs, LGB JCM TOW / HELLFIRE

22. A Lesson From Air-to-Air • Joint Air Dominance Organization (JADO) • Air-to-Air Focus • USAF/ USN Focus • In Start-up Mode • Need to Incorporate Precision Strike • Air-to-Air/ Air-to-Ground Framework • Capability Focus Independent of Service or Launch Platform (SLAMRAAM) Joint is not a Four Letter Word

23. Preparing For The Future • Small Diameter Bomb • Field More Precise, 250 lb Bomb In FY06 • Universal Armament Interface • Develop Plug-and-Play Aircraft/Weapon Interfaces • Net-Ready Weapons • Establish Interface Standard For Weapon Data Links • ACTD FOR SDB, JASSM, JSOW-C, MALD-J • Directed Energy Application – Are We Ready? • 8-10 Feb 05 Workshop Focused On Transition • Armament Symposium – 4-5 Oct 05 • Focus Areas: CBRNE, CAS, Long Range Strike

24. QUESTIONS?

25. Historical PerspectiveInfusion of Weapon New Starts FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 JDAM WCMD = ACAT I Programs JASSM SDB I MALD JASSM-ER Budget Priorities Rule Technology Transitions SDB II

26. Phased Threat Distribution