1 / 26

Actively managing LD: Collaborative Planning in the Secondary setting

Actively managing LD: Collaborative Planning in the Secondary setting. Combined Associations’ Conference SPELD, RSTAQ, LDA Hilton Hotel, Brisbane September 10 th , 2005 Dr Ruth Burnett. Keeping the End in Mind with the Student in Mind. One size fits all curriculum

freya-hardy
Télécharger la présentation

Actively managing LD: Collaborative Planning in the Secondary setting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Actively managing LD:Collaborative Planning in the Secondary setting Combined Associations’ Conference SPELD, RSTAQ, LDA Hilton Hotel, Brisbane September 10th, 2005 Dr Ruth Burnett

  2. Keeping the End in Mindwith the Student in Mind One size fits all curriculum Differentiating curriculum Collaborative Planning Unpacking the Outcome by Backtracking

  3. Actively Managing LDContexts of Collaboration • Science Department and Learning Support • Heads of Department Meeting • Whole of school • InfoEd- Managing and sharing relevant student information

  4. Keeping the Student in Mind

  5. To Actively Manage LD Realities for secondary teachers in the mainstream classroom • The adolescent learner • The diverse learning needs of students

  6. To Actively Manage LD Realities for the learning support teacher in a secondary setting • Sharing information regarding students • Sharing strategies that ‘enable’ all students

  7. Westwood, 1995. A study of 300 Australian teachers

  8. Year 8 Science Setting the Scene • How did this opportunity come about? • Who was involved? • Why was it successful?

  9. Teacher concernsTopic: Separating mixtures • In the past, a poorly done outcome task, how can we (the teachers) improve? • Students have difficulty writing the report • Students don’t ‘think through’ the separation processes even though we ‘teach’ each one • Students don’t seem to ‘get it’ when given the Outcome Task

  10. A diversity of learners • mixed abilities • a range of learning difficulties/disabilities • central auditory processing • hearing impairment, Ascertainment Level 4 • ADD, ADHD • Poor fine motor skills • Poor writing skills and spelling

  11. CollaborationBringing bodies of expert knowledge together • Science and learning support • Removing some of the barriers in the path of students experiencing learning difficulties • enhancing teachers’ repertoire of teaching strategies • ‘knowing’ your students • One in Eleven students has a language learning disability(Brent, Gough, Robinson, 2001)

  12. Raising teacher awareness Curriculum specific language is critical for learning 1 in 11 students has a language learning disability The increasing demands of the secondary curriculum for all adolescent learners Common misconceptions Students should have basic literacy skills in place These students should be the responsibility of the Learning Support teacher Students should be responsible for their own organisation The English Department is primarily responsible for teaching writing skills

  13. How would you separate the powdered clay that clings to the peas? • Continue your flow chart of cards on the A3 sheet.

  14. Why were the learning outcomes positive for this class of students? • Included socially and academically in their groups • Group arrangement provided natural scaffolding so that students with difficulties were able to do the task • Peers could give immediate help when needed • Relaxed relationship between students and teacher • Activity required students to be involved in doing and verbalising, telling the story, using the language

  15. Students had time to clarify the question, think through the problem and respond • Teacher did not suggest solution, but asked questions that led students to the next step • Teacher gave clear, explicit instructions, students knew what they were expected to do • Games approach

  16. Heads of Department Meeting • Sharing literacy results • Sharing teaching strategies that worked • Using other ‘experts’ • Speech and Language Pathologist • Inviting, creating discussion

  17. Modelling Oral Visual Physical A structure to follow Gives entry into an activity Clarifies for students what they should learn Teaching strategies

  18. Scaffolding Teachers need to know when to add or dismantle scaffolding Graphic organisers Models Meets the need of visual learners Walks students through the activity

  19. As students make progress, scaffolding is removed or replaced. The aim is to make students aware of the ways in which strategies can help them learn more effectively.

  20. Direct and Explicit teaching Students know what is expected of them Short, carefully sequenced steps Identifies what is important Explicit scaffolding Teaches strategies Can be whole class, small group or individual Provides a structure that can be added to or removed

  21. Groups Focus on the students reaching their own understanding Need to be actively constructed, requirements of activity Allow students to ‘feed off’ one another’s ideas Teachers have more opportunities to assess learning Gives students time they need for processing instructions Reduces pressure on students Encourages all students to respond Opportunity for peer tutoring

  22. A whole school commitment • Individual teachers make a difference • Innovative practices • Whole school commitment makes the greatest impact

  23. InfoEd • An information management service supporting teaching and learning • online • www.infoed.com.au

More Related