1 / 39

Low Band DX / Contest Receiving Antennas Using End-Fire Arrays of K9AY Loops Richard C. Jaeger, K4IQJ Auburn, AL Hunts

Low Band DX / Contest Receiving Antennas Using End-Fire Arrays of K9AY Loops Richard C. Jaeger, K4IQJ Auburn, AL Huntsville, August 20, 2011 K4IQJ@mindspring.com. OUTLINE. Introduction & Overview K9AY Array Simulation Results Array Implementation 3 Element 2 Element Results

fritz
Télécharger la présentation

Low Band DX / Contest Receiving Antennas Using End-Fire Arrays of K9AY Loops Richard C. Jaeger, K4IQJ Auburn, AL Hunts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Low Band DX / Contest Receiving Antennas Using End-Fire Arrays of K9AY Loops Richard C. Jaeger, K4IQJ Auburn, AL Huntsville, August 20, 2011 K4IQJ@mindspring.com

  2. OUTLINE • Introduction & Overview • K9AY Array Simulation Results • Array Implementation • 3 Element • 2 Element • Results • Discussion / Observations © RCJ - 2

  3. BACKGROUNDLow Band Receiving • Started with K9AY loop pair • Added 4-square of short verticals (100’ side) • Very poor ground conditions • Very rocky with rock shelves and clay • 2-3 mS/M ground conductivity • 4-Square not level • K9AY loop pair generally better than 4-square © RCJ - 3

  4. BACKGROUND • Wanted to try a 4-square of loops • Could not site the 4-square array well on my lot • Uneven lot + esthetic considerations • Reviewed some existing literature • K9AY paper on loop arrays [1] • ON4UN book [2] • Dallas Lankford Papers [3] • Realized that the side elements of the 4-square essentially operate in parallel • Decided to try a 1-2-1 binomial array of loops • Design goal - maximize RDF © RCJ - 4

  5. 4-Square Array End-Fire Array 1/0 Incoming Signal 1/0 2/q 1/q 1/q 1/2q 1/2q BACKGROUND4-SQUARE / END-FIRE “TRANSFORMATION” © RCJ - 5

  6. RDFReceiving Directivity Factor • Noise generally comes in from all directions • RDF compares main lobe gain to average gain over whole antenna • RDFdB = Gfor(dB) - Gavg(dB) © RCJ - 6

  7. ARRAY COMPARISONK9AY Loop Forward Gain: -23.6 dBi Average Gain: -31.0 RDF: 7.4 dB Horizontal Beamwidth: 173o F/B: 9.5 dB © RCJ - 7

  8. ARRAY COMPARISONTwo-Element Endfire Array - 80’ Spacing Gain: -25.6 dBi RDF: 10.5 dB Horizontal Beamwidth: 96o F/B: 16.0 dB © RCJ - 8

  9. ARRAY COMPARISONThree-Element Endfire Array - 80’ Spacing Gain: -29.2 dBi RDF: 12.7 dB Horizontal Beamwidth: 75o F/B: 24.0 dB © RCJ - 9

  10. ARRAY COMPARISONFour-Element Endfire Array - 80’ Spacing Gain: -37.2 dBi RDF: 14.4 dB Beamwidth: 54o F/B: 24.4 dB (1:2.65:2.65:1) © RCJ - 10

  11. ARRAY COMPARISONVertical Patterns vs. Number of Elements 1 2 3 4 © RCJ - 11

  12. ARRAY COMPARISONHorizontal Patterns vs. Number of Elements 1 2 4 3 © RCJ - 12

  13. ARRAY COMPARISONThree-element Array - 160M & 80M 1.825 MHz 3.505 MHz © RCJ - 13

  14. ARRAY IMPLEMENTATIONPlacement of the Arrays • Layout of NE/SW (160’) & NW/SE (115’) Arrays • Heavily wooded lot • Front yard is left of house • Small lake off to the right • Downhill slope to right © RCJ - 14

  15. 3-ELEMENT ARRAY OPTIMIZATIONAlternate Current Ratios Design point 1:1.8:1 3 Current Ratios 1:1.9:1 1:2:1 © RCJ - 15

  16. 3-ELEMENT ARRAY OPTIMIZATIONAlternate Current Ratios • Enhanced RDF achieved with other current ratios • Settled upon 1:1.8:1 © RCJ - 16

  17. ARRAY IMPLEMENTATIONSystem Design • Controllers • One Hi-Z • One DX Engineering • Hi-Z Amplifiers • 500  antennas connected directly to amplifier inputs • Center amplifier drives a coax pair & two controller inputs • Output Resistance Rout • 75 W for ends • ≈ 38 W for center - adjusted for 1.8:1 output • Must switch loop termination with controller phasing • Beaded chokes (The Wireman) • 50  coax © RCJ - 17

  18. ARRAY IMPLEMENTATIONMiscellaneous • Make Loops as identical as possible • 3-ft ground stake under antenna • Four 20’ radials under each loop (45o relative to loop) • Beaded chokes throughout • Approximately 1000  on TB • “Braid breakers” now in NE/SW array • No apparent difference • No observed interaction with grounded aluminum supports • Simulation shows small effect • Plan to use as short vertical array Feedline Choke © RCJ - 18

  19. ARRAY IMPLEMENTATIONPhasing Lines • Network or antenna analyzer • Adjust by measuring the resonant frequency of open-circuited coax lines © RCJ - 19

  20. ARRAY IMPLEMENTATIONLoop Termination and Switching Single Termination with DPDT Switch Doubly Terminated with SPDT Switch © RCJ - 20

  21. ARRAY IMPLEMENTATIONLoop Antennas & Supports “Hidden” in Front & Side Yards - Black Wire & String Fiberglass (NE/SW) or Aluminum Poles (NW/SE) © RCJ - 21

  22. ARRAY IMPLEMENTATIONAmplifier/Switching Boxes Single Loop Corner Loop Pair © RCJ - 22

  23. ARRAY IMPLEMENTATIONAmplifier/Switching Boxes • Weather-Proof Boxes (Lowes) • Hi-Z Amplifier: should be ac coupled • Direction Relay • Termination Resistor • Stainless Steel HW © RCJ - 23

  24. RESULTSExperimental Setup • Array Solutions VNA 2180 (50 W) • Port A drives 50 W coax with 50-W termination at input of High-Z amplifiers • 75 W coax from controller to VNA • 75 W - 50 W Pad at input to VNA Port B • Measurements repeatable to within 0.3 dB and less than 0.5o © RCJ - 24

  25. RESULTSMeasurements Note: Same phasing line utilized on 160 & 80 M Gain in good agreement with SPICE models © RCJ - 25

  26. RESULTSFinal Simulations - 160 M © RCJ - 26

  27. RESULTSFinal Simulations - 80 M © RCJ - 27

  28. RESULTSFinal Simulation Comparisons © RCJ - 28

  29. RESULTSDX - The Bottom Line • Copied FR/DJ7RJ & 5R8RJ night after night on 160 • Not readable on inverted L transmit antenna • Worked S79GM on both 160 M & 80 M. • Also could not copy on inverted L • PJ4 - First TB qso required loop array • Missed 9Q5ØQN - couldn’t hear me • Consolation – Easily heard and worked on 80 M for new one • Past season successes • TJ9PF, 4L/UUØJM, XU7ACY, 9L5MS, 5M2TT, BU2AQ • 234 Countries, 38 Zones • 160M propagation testing with VK3ZL • 13 times through June-July-August QRN in 2010 • 33 times so far June-July-August 2011 • Routinely use on 160 M / 80 M to “save ears” • Use on any frequency where there is an advantage • E.g. 40M, 30M and up - there are lobes pointed somewhere • Have used on 17M and 12M © RCJ - 29

  30. RESULTSContesting - The Bottom Line • Low Band DX Contests • Can now hear well on 160/80 M • Operation far less difficult / tiring on the low bands • 2 EL K9AY Loop Array with Half Size Loops • Worked fine on 80M • Marginal output on 160M • Recent NAQP CW • Much grumbling after the contest regarding qrn problems on 80/160 • I really had little trouble hearing on 80 or 160 • Biggest problem was selecting the correct direction © RCJ - 30

  31. TWO-ELEMENT ARRAYDesign & Implementation • Simple Implementation • Two-element Arrays Give Very a Useful Improvement (3 dB) • RDF: 7.5 dB  10.5 dB • Narrow Spacing Possible if Space is Limited (30+ feet) • Half Size Loops • Work well on 80/40/30 • Marginal so far on 160M • Elements Were Originally Added One at a Time • Significant Improvement Noted at Each Step © RCJ - 31

  32. TWO-ELEMENT ARRAYImplementation • Hi-Z Amplifiers • Hi-Z 2-3 Element Controller • 4 Loops for 4 directions • 13o Phasing Line © RCJ - 32

  33. TWO-ELEMENT ARRAYPhase Plots for Two Antenna Paths Hi-Z Amplifiers Hi-Z 2-3 Element Controller 150 ft RG-6 Coax 13o Phasing Line RCJ - 33

  34. TWO-ELEMENT ARRAYVNA 2180 Results © RCJ - 34

  35. TWO-ELEMENT ARRAYFinal Simulation Using Measured Data Gain: -28.6 dBi RDF: 10.4 dB Horiz. Beamwidth: 98o © RCJ - 35

  36. DISCUSSION / OBSERVATIONSLoops and Short Verticals • A short vertical array parallels NE/SW array • Separated by approximately 20’ • Loops almost always better at my location • Vertical array better only one time in two months of comparisons • Simulation indicates small advantage for the loops • Array factor should be the same • Inherent F/B of loop provides some advantage (1+ dB) • Output of wider spaced array is clearly higher • Vertical supports on NW/SE array can operate as short (26’) vertical array elements • Plan to be able to switch back and forth - not implemented yet • My skill level is much higher now than when I did first 4-square installation - phasing not optimal © RCJ - 36

  37. DISCUSSION / OBSERVATIONSOther Ideas • Latest version • Doubly terminated loops • Switch single amplifier input; Should ac couple loops to amplifiers • An alternative for three-element array ratios • Use identical amplifiers & attenuate the front and rear amplifiers by a factor of 0.54. • Only requires one coax from the center amplifier • Noise figure is degraded by attenuation factor • Degradation was noticeable when I tried it • Side rejection is very high. • One array may be useful as “noise” antenna for the other. • Combine the two array outputs, to fill 45o directions • RDF drops to 10 dB © RCJ - 37

  38. REFERENCES • Gary Breed, K9AY, "Arrays of K9AY Loops: "Medium-sized" low band RX antenna solutions," Sept. 15, 2007. http://www.aytechnologies.com • John Devoldere, ON4UN's Low-Band DXing, Fourth & Fifth Editions, ARRL, Newington, CT: 2005 & 2011. • Dallas Lankford, http://groups.yahoo.com/group/thedallasfiles • http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/m3/index.html • Hi-Z Antennas 4-Square, http://www.hizantennas.com • DX Engineering 4-Square, http://www.dxengineering.com • Max-Gain Systems, http://www.mgs4u.com • The Wireman, http://www.thewireman.com • Richard C. Jaeger, K4IQJ “Multi-Element End-fire Arrays of K9AY Loops,” expanded version of 2011 Dayton presentation, May 15, 2011, available from the author. ( k4iqj@mindspring.com ) © RCJ - 38

  39. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION • QUESTIONS? K4IQJ@mindspring.com © RCJ - 39

More Related