1 / 14

Status of Fast Tracking Algorithm MdcHough

Status of Fast Tracking Algorithm MdcHough. Guowei YU 8 th March 2006. Outline. Introduction MdcHough Algorithm Results and Discussions Summary. Introduction. Algorithm Developments in MDC Reconstruction Presented by W.D.Li ,Migrated from ATLAS. Purpose Efficient track finding

gautam
Télécharger la présentation

Status of Fast Tracking Algorithm MdcHough

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of Fast Tracking Algorithm MdcHough Guowei YU 8th March 2006

  2. Outline • Introduction • MdcHough Algorithm • Results and Discussions • Summary

  3. Introduction • Algorithm Developments in MDC Reconstruction • Presented by W.D.Li ,Migrated from ATLAS

  4. Purpose • Efficient track finding • Nice transverse momentum resolution • High efficiency of track finding at high noise level

  5. Cosθ=0.83 Cosθ=0.93 Interaction point MdcHough Algorithm • 43 layers,19 axial type • |cos|<0.93 • Cell is near square ~8.1mm

  6. Flow of MdcHough Initial track finding MdcHough Local maximum finding Hits PT Track selection and Merging Track fitting

  7. Initial track finding (use a LUT-base Hough Transform) (R,)  (,1/pT) [(0~2) pT (400MeV~)] qCTR=sin (–0) CT= 0.3/pT Build a wire-ordered look-up table (  1/pT= 300  100) . wire n+1 wire n active wire n-1 wire . . Flow of MdcHough

  8. Local maximum finding (select good track candidates by wired-oreded LUT) Track selectionand Merging Nhit > 15 Merge some tracks sharing more than 9 hits Flow of MdcHough Flow of MdcHough

  9. Flow of MdcHough Flow of MdcHough • Track fitting • Obtain hits from Bin-ordered LUT • Fitting track to get PT by using lpav tool . bin n+1 bin n bin bin n-1 number . .

  10. Track Reconstruction CPU Time~ 1ms/1 track Resolution of PT(1.0GeV ) Generate (PT :1GeV) by Fixpt Efficiency of Reconstruction () VS cos(polar angular) Results and Discussion p=8.0 MeV

  11. Efficiency of Reconstruction VS PT( e  p) Momentum resolution VS PT (μ,e,π,p) Double Gauss Fit

  12. Efficiency vs noise Resolution VS noise Noise level type 0: = C type 1:  1/r type 2: 1/r2 (PT:1.0GeV )

  13. Summary • It costs about 1ms to reconstruct 1 track • Efficiency of reconstruction() : •  >99% (PT>300MeV) for single track •  >99% when noise level are 5%,10% ,15% and 20% •  decrease quickly when polar angular more than 0.8 • Resolution of momentum(p): • PT < 1.0GeVp of proton is more than others • PT > 1.0GeVp keeps about same value for all particles • p turns badatnoise level is more than 10% in type “0” • Same results by adding wires shift; • Further work is to enhance  nearpolar angular and test the Algorithm in adjusted magnetic field

  14. Thank!

More Related