1 / 48

Enhancing Education Through Technology

Enhancing Education Through Technology. Competitive Grant Round 8. 2009-2011. Workshop Agenda. EETT-C Round 8 Grant Overview 12 Step Program for EETT-C Round 8 Application Review Forms Project Narrative Regional Template Questions and Answers. Purpose of EETT-C Program.

gratia
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing Education Through Technology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Enhancing Education Through Technology • Competitive Grant Round 8 2009-2011

  2. Workshop Agenda • EETT-C Round 8 Grant Overview • 12 Step Program for EETT-C Round 8 • Application Review • Forms • Project Narrative • Regional Template • Questions and Answers

  3. Purpose of EETT-C Program

  4. Technology and Curriculum • Student achievement is the grand focus • Technology is a tool to: • support the adopted curriculum • help students achieve academic content standards with current, relevant, and engaging skills and resources • improve teaching and learning of adopted curriculum • improve home and school communications

  5. Four Program Goals of EETT-C • Increase students’ technology literacy and academic achievement of content standards • Increase teachers’ technology literacy and curriculum integration • Expand access to technology and provide technical support • Enhance communications and collaboration

  6. EETT-C Round 8 Funding

  7. 12 Step Program for EETT-C

  8. Step 1: Planning/Writing Team • Planning Team: • Curriculum Coordinator • Data Collection/Analysis Coordinator • Categorical Program Coordinator • Professional Development Coordinator • Technology Director • Union Representation • Target School Administrators and Teachers • Private Schools • Writing Team: • Small portion of planning team

  9. Step 2: Review RFA • Form 1: Application Title Page • Form 2: Project Summary • Form 2a: Program Profile and School Data • Form 2b: Small School District Addendum • Project Narrative • Optional Bibliography/Citations • Form 3: GOBs and Data Collection • Form 4: Strategies and Timeline • Form 5: Project Budget and Timeline • Form 6: Priority List of Schools • Form 7: Consortiums and/or Partnerships and Letters of Support • Form 8: Competitive Application Checklist

  10. Step 2: Review RFA • Goal - CDE defined vision (not measured) • Objective - CDE defined measure • Benchmark - Baseline data plus growth target • Growth Target - amount of projected improvement • May not be modified after approval of funding • Set challenging, yet realistic, growth targets for objectives • Follow-up grant eligibility is contingent upon meeting 70% of growth targets for each objective

  11. Step 2: Review RFA • Four required performance goals • Goals 1, 2, 3 • Enter projected growth target for each objective and benchmark data • Programs focusing on the same target students or teachers for years 1 and 2 have two years to meet growth target • Programs focusing on different target students or teachers in years 1 and 2 must meet growth targets annually • Goal 4 • Enter measurable objective and benchmark data along with projected growth target

  12. Step 3: Contact Private Schools

  13. Step 4: Backward Map • Backward map from June 30, 2009 • What needs to be done? • By whom? • By when?

  14. Step 5: Gather Baseline Data • Use consistent data instruments to establish baseline percentages, growth targets, and define end of year percentages • Establish consistent data instruments, items, and calculation methods for each objective • Data for objectives measured by multiple instruments must be collected and aggregated to determine baseline and growth

  15. Step 5: Gather Baseline Data • Target Students’ • Technology Literacy • Achievement Data • Target Teachers’ • Technology Literacy • Curriculum Integration • Target Classroom Observation Data • Target Classroom Student to Computer Ratios • Communication and Collaboration Data • Data for any additional objectives

  16. Step 6: Identify Program Focus • Determine the curricular priority • Determine the technology proficiency priority • Target schools • Target teachers • Target students

  17. Step 7: Select or Design a Research-Based Program • Apple Professional Development • CDE Improvement Guides, Tools, and Resources • CTAP • Doing What Works • EAST Initiative • eMINTS • GenYes • Intel Teach Program • ISTE NETS Seal of Alignment • What Works Clearinghouse

  18. Step 8: Form Partnerships and/or Consortiums • Business/Corporations • Universities and Educational Institutions • Health Care Organizations • Government and Military Agencies • National Service and Volunteer Organizations • Faith Organizations • Senior Citizen Organizations • Cultural and Recreational Institutions • Other Community Organizations • Community Individuals

  19. Step 8: Partnerships and Consortiums • Partnership applications are encouraged and receive a competitive advantage in application scoring • Must have a letter from each partner identified that briefly summarizes how the partnership is mutually beneficial and will support the grant program • Proven experience with technology literacy and curriculum integration • Evidence the partnership will have a positive impact on student academic achievement • Work, products, strategies, or services are aligned with or based upon relevant research

  20. Form 8: EETT-C Partnerships and Consortiums • Student-Centered Partnerships • helps with student incentives, student hardware, and other services and products for students • Family-Centered Partnerships • supports parent workshops, parent incentives, and other forms of assistance • District-School Centered Partnerships • helps with equipment , professional development facilitation, and classroom assistance • Community-Centered Partnerships • helps with community service learning and other outreach

  21. Step 9: Calculate Budget • Two (fiscal) year grant program • July 2009-June 2011 • Awards based on $300 per 4th-8th grade student at applicant schools • (2007 CBEDS) • Potential follow-up grant of $45 per student • Dependent upon availability of Federal funding and the fulfillment of grant conditions and assurances

  22. Step 9: Calculate Budget • Determine maximum two year program budget, based on $300 multiplied by the 2007 Grades 4-8 CBEDS at all schools listed on Form 6 • Do not exceed 60% of the regional allocation • Specify how much of the budget will be spent in Year 1 and Year 2 • >10% change in spending in any object code requires a LEA to submit a Budget Modification to the CDE for approval • Describe how the funds will be allocated within each object code, include leveraged funding amounts (if applicable)

  23. Step 10: Prioritize Target Schools • List schools in rank order for funding • Use the Grades 4-8 2007 CBEDS to determine grant funding • If partially funded, the CDE will fund schools in the order listed by the LEA

  24. Step 11:Review Technology Needs • Hardware • Electronic Learning Resources • All Electronic Learning Resources purchased with EETT Competitive funds must be either: • California Learning Resource Network reviewed and meet state standards • www.clrn.org • Curriculum-based electronic learning resources that are part of a State Board of Education approved K-8 program • Network • Infrastructure • Technical Support

  25. Step 12: CTAP and CDE Support • CTAP 7 can provide support for EdTechProfile teacher and student accounts and data reports • CTAP 7 can provide grant implementation support • Professional Development • SETS Projects • www.cde.ca.gov/ls/et/rs/sets.asp • CDE • http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/fo/r5/eettc09rfa.asp

  26. EETT-C Application

  27. EETT-C Application Scoring • In order to be eligible for a grant award, applications must score at least 50 points • Scored applications will be grouped by rubric scores into Decile Bands: • 90-100 points • 80-89 points • 70-79 points • 60-69 points • 50-59 points • Small school districts move to the top of their decile band • Applicants that receive <$6000 in EETT-F rank below small schools in their decile band

  28. EETT-C Application Examination • Review Forms

  29. EETT-C Project Narrative • Describes the research-based program strategies, resources, evaluation, and timelines outlined in the application forms • Address all six sections of the Project Narrative • Program for Students • Professional Development Program for Teachers • Expand Access to Technology and Provide Technology Support • Communication and Collaboration Among Home, School, and Community • Evaluation and Program Management • Follow-up Grant & Sustainability

  30. EETT-C Program for Students Narrative • Describe the technology literacy and academic learning needs of target students • Describe how the LEA’s research-based Program for Students, including relevant research citations, and State Board of Education approved publisher or CLRN-reviewed electronic learning resources will meet the students’ identified learning needs • LEA partners with an organization to develop a comprehensive program suited to the specific learning needs of targeted students

  31. EETT-C Program for Teachers Narrative • Describe the technology literacy and curriculum integration learning needs of the target teachers • Describe how the LEA’s research-based Program for Teachers, including relevant research citations, will meet the target teachers’ identified needs • LEA partners with an organization to develop a comprehensive Ed Tech integration program

  32. EETT-C Expanded Access Narrative • Identify the current student-to-computer ratio used by the target students and teachers • Identify the new electronic learning resources, infrastructure, hardware, and peripherals to be acquired and describe how the new resources will support the grant program • Describe how technology resources, existing and new, will be used to support data-driven decision making • Describe how adequate technical support will be provided to support the grant program

  33. EETT-C Communication and Collaboration Narrative • Describe how technology will be used to establish or improve communication and collaboration among home, school, and community • Describe how students’ learning needs will be supported through the use of technology for communication and collaboration • Describe how partnerships will help to improve communication and collaboration among home, school, and community

  34. EETT-C Communication and Collaboration Narrative • Possible areas to establish or improve communication and collaboration: • Email accounts, expanded web access • Develop communication channels • Using multimedia for communication • Sponsoring parent/community events that promote involvement in student learning and technology

  35. EETT-C Projected Budget and Narrative • Minimum of 25% of the grant award must be allocated for professional development that is relevant to the program • Examples of appropriate professional development expenditures: • Teacher stipends, substitute teachers for attending professional development outside of contract hours • Salaries, benefits, stipends, contracts for professional development trainers, facilitators, and mentors • Professional development workshops and conferences specified in the grant application • Materials and supplies necessary to carry out professional development, consistent with established LEA policies

  36. EETT-C Evaluation and Program Management Narrative • Describe the LEA’s evaluation plan, including Who, What, When, Why, and How the LEA will collect, analyze, evaluate, and report on every required and optional objective • Reference SETDA’s Common Data Elements • Describe the LEA’s program management group by job, title, roles, and responsibilities, including how often will the group meet and how will ongoing communications take place? • Describe the continuous data-driven improvement process for monitoring the impact the grant program is having on all goals

  37. EETT-C Evaluation Reports Narrative • Collected program data is used in Semi-Annual and Annual Performance Reports to the CDE • Reports evaluate progress in meeting annual benchmarks and program impact and share outcomes with stakeholders • Report templates will be posted to the CDE website and are expected to be similar to the Round 7 Performance Reports

  38. EETT-C Follow-Up Narrative • Describe how the Follow-Up grant ($45/student) will be used to help sustain or expand the grant program • Describe other funding sources or partnerships that may contribute to the sustainability or expansion of the grant program

  39. EETT-C Projected Budget and Narrative • Other uses for grant funds: • Hardware • Infrastructure • Technical support • Electronic Learning Resources • CLRN-reviewed • Supplies and materials • Expenses related to fostering communication among parents, teachers, students, and community • Grant management coordination, evaluation, and reporting

  40. EETT-C Multiple Measures for Student Technology Literacy Data • LEAs can choose the data instruments used for Student Survey and Classroom Observations: • EdTech Profile’s Student Survey and classroom observation instrument • Existing free or fee-based student technology literacy survey and classroom observation instrument • LEA-developed specific classroom observation tool for EETT-C Program • Add other data instruments as desired

  41. EETT-C Multiple Measures for Student Achievement Data • LEAs can collect Target Student data from: • LEA-developed or purchased benchmark assessment for targeted subject area(s) and grade levels • Standards-aligned, state-approved, text book benchmark assessment for targeted subject area(s) and grade levels

  42. EETT-C Multiple Measures for Teacher Data • Teachers’ EdTech Profile Technology Assessment Profile • Classroom Observations • Add other data instruments as desired

  43. EETT-C Expanded Access Data • LEA-determined data instrument(s) to track target classrooms’ student to computer ratios • Complete the California School Technology Survey annually for school-wide ratios

  44. EETT-C Strategies and Timeline • List specific actions or strategies that will be implemented to achieve each of the performance goals, objectives and benchmarks specified in Form 3 and the Project Narrative • Include the beginning and ending dates and list the title of the person responsible for implementation

  45. EETT-C Partnerships and Consortiums • Consortium is a group of school districts and/or direct-funded charter schools • Minimum of one eligible school district or direct-funded charter must apply and be the designated LEA • Only students in grades 4-8 at eligible districts and direct-funded charters within a consortium are funded

  46. EETT-C Application Requirements • Include all application components • 12 -point font recommended for readability • Pages must be numbered with headings and subheadings for each of the six sections that match the Scoring Criteria (25 pages) • Pages must include line numbers (36 lines) • Print, portrait, single-sided 8 1/2 x 11 paper with 1” margins • Signatures on all required forms, assurances, and certifications

  47. EETT-C Application Details • All applications are required to submit: • One original signed (blue ink), unbound printed copy • Three stapled printed copies (flat, no binders) • One digital copy of the complete application on CD with LEA name on it • Applications are due: • June 30, 2009 by 5 pm • Mail (5 days before application deadline) • Courier (2 days before application deadline) • Deliver to CDE

  48. Thank you! Questions: elopez@fcoe.org

More Related