1 / 32

FILM STYLE & TECHNOLOGY TO 1930

FILM STYLE & TECHNOLOGY TO 1930. TECHNOLOGY, STYLE & STANDARDIZATION. TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE & THE MODE OF PRODUCTION. Technological change explained by 1 or more of 3 basic causes PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY Cut costs, make results predictable, solve particular problems PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION

hamilton-moore
Télécharger la présentation

FILM STYLE & TECHNOLOGY TO 1930

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FILM STYLE & TECHNOLOGYTO 1930 TECHNOLOGY, STYLE & STANDARDIZATION

  2. TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE & THE MODE OF PRODUCTION • Technological change explained by 1 or more of 3 basic causes • PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY • Cut costs, make results predictable, solve particular problems • PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION • Differentiate a studio’s films (within limits)

  3. TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE & THE MODE OF PRODUCTION • ADHERENCE TO STANDARDS OF QUALITY • Increased the quality of the product • Fit conception of quality embraced by CHC • Better (clearer) storytelling • Greater realism of the mise-en-scène • Enhanced spectacle

  4. TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE & THE MODE OF PRODUCTION • Could complement & collide with 1 another • Any change would result in change in other areas also

  5. FILM TECHNOLOGY & THE CLASSICAL STYLE • 4 aspects of change • DIRECTION • Trend or trended change • Stylistic change occurs within a set of set of possibilities • Style trends toward or away from certain options for many reasons

  6. FILM TECHNOLOGY & THE CLASSICAL STYLE • FUNCTION • Innovation considered an option if it fulfills the same function as an already-accepted option • More acceptable if it fulfills additional functions (easier to use, saves money, increases verisimilitude, etc.)

  7. FILM TECHNOLOGY & THE CLASSICAL STYLE • TIMING • Technology not used until capitalism needs it • Innovations may be available, but not used until there is a perceived need • CAUSATION • Typically, explanations rely on artist & inventor; artist needs something, inventor invents it • More useful to look at H’wood institutions (companies, trade groups, etc.)

  8. FILM TECHNOLOGY & THE CLASSICAL STYLE • TECHNOLOGY & H’WOOD INSTITUTIONS • Studios reluctant to devote $ to “R &D” • Preferred to rely on trade organizations: • THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CINEMATOGRAPHERS • THE SOCIETY OF MOTION PICTURE ENGINEERS • THE ACADEMY OF MOTION PICTURE ARTS & SCIENCES • Spread common ideas about “good” filmmaking, production problems, acceptable options, etc. • Suppliers looked to them for ideas about what was needed, what solutions were acceptable, etc.

  9. INITIAL STANDARDIZATION OF THE BASIC TECHNOLOGY • STANDARDIZING CAMERAS • CRITERIA FOR ADOPTING CAMERA TECHNOLOGY • QUALITY: ability to create a clear, steady image; controllability • EFFICIENCY: durability, ease of handling • NOVELTY: versatility (special effects, etc.) • Development slow due to patent control by the Trust

  10. INITIAL STANDARDIZATION OF THE BASIC TECHNOLOGY • After legal decision 1912, 4 types of cameras popular in Hollywood: • Bell & Howell • Steady registration • Easily controllable, esp. in focusing • Akeley • Used in such situations as aerial photography • Held only 200 feet of film & image not as steady as the B&H

  11. Bell & Howell

  12. Bell & Howell

  13. Akeley

  14. INITIAL STANDARDIZATION OF THE BASIC TECHNOLOGY • Mitchell • Faster focusing system, & built-in matte holders • Inferior registration • Eyemo • Spring-driven motor, small; could be put in unusual places • Held only 100 feet of film & could use a limited range of lenses

  15. Mitchell

  16. INITIAL STANDARDIZATION OF THE BASIC TECHNOLOGY • STANDARDIZING LIGHTING EQUIPMENT • CRITERIA FOR ADOPTING LIGHTING TECHNOLOGY • QUALITY: clear, steady image; controllability • EFFICIENCY: durability; ease of handling; efficiency (in use of energy) • NOVELTY: versatility (special effects, etc.)

  17. INITIAL STANDARDIZATION OF THE BASIC TECHNOLOGY • DIFFUSED SUNLIGHT • Sunlight was later diffused by muslin to make it more even & controllable

  18. INITIAL STANDARDIZATION OF THE BASIC TECHNOLOGY • DIFFUSED SUNLIGHT • Sunlight diffused by muslin to make it more even & controllable • MERCURY-VAPOR LAMPS • Most efficient type • Least directional, useless for motivated lighting

  19. MERCURY-VAPOR LAMP

  20. INITIAL STANDARDIZATION OF THE BASIC TECHNOLOGY • ARC LAMPS • Good directional lighting • Difficult to handle • INCANDESCENT LIGHTS • Easiest to handle • Inefficient & low in actinicity (less of the light registered an image on film) • All 3 came to be used together simultaneously

  21. INITIAL STANDARDIZATION OF THE BASIC TECHNOLOGY • EDITING • Most important innovation was the WORKPRINT • Positive print used in initial editing, instead of original negative • LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY • Hand development was replaced by machine development • More efficient, but decreased control

  22. FILM STYLE & TECHNOLOGYTO 1930 TECHNOLOGY, STYLE & STANDARDIZATION

  23. ORTHOCHROMATIC TO PANCHROMATIC STOCK • ORTHOCHROMATIC FILM STOCK (ORTHO) • DISADVANTAGES • Insensitive to yellow & red • Blonde hair looked dark, leading to rim lighting • Red make-up showed up as deep black • Blue photographed as white • Clouds did not show up • Blue eyes looked white • Directors & cinematographers used blue filters or glasses to see mise-en-scène

  24. ORTHOCHROMATIC TO PANCHROMATIC STOCK • PANCHROMATIC FILM STOCK (PANCHRO) • Came in 1913 due to experimentation with color cinematography • DISADVANTAGES • More expensive than ortho • Slower (needed more light) • Physically unstable • ADVANTAGE • Sensitive to entire color spectrum

  25. ORTHOCHROMATIC TO PANCHROMATIC STOCK • In 1920s, speed of panchro increased • Became a regular Eastman Kodak product in 1923 • In 1925, Eastman Kodak: • Lowered the cost of panchro • Increased the speed • Improved its durability • Actively promoted it • Studios then willing to use it instead of chromo because: • Easier to use with the mise-en-scène • Saved money on lighting (worked better with inkies) • By 1928, panchro used in 85% of all shots

  26. THE SOFT STYLE OF CINEMATOGRAPHY • By mid-20s, filmmakers adopted soft style of cinematography • Experimentation began in mid-teens in an attempt to imitate still photography • Seen as a way to separate character from background • Appealed to the aesthetic of pictorial beauty popular among cinematographers • Many of them had begun as still photographers • They sought to associate films with art

  27. THE SOFT STYLE OF CINEMATOGRAPHY • Films used “normal” photography with selected close shots in the soft style • By mid-20s, soft shots for glamour purposes very common; many stars insisted upon it • Presented a problem for continuity: • Often a clash between hard & soft shots • Considered a price worth paying for added product differentiation of pictorial beauty, star glamour & promotion • Later, efforts made to minimize the clash

  28. THE MAZDA TESTS • 1928, H’wood conducted “Mazda tests” • Promoted use of incandescent lights (“Mazdas”) • Established panchro & inkies for 30+ years • Promoted soft style • These tests also: • Cemented link between H’wood & manufacturers; professional organizations became formal liaisons • Provided model of cooperation among studios & manufacturers used in diffusion of sound technology

  29. MAZDA LAMP

  30. MAZDA LAMP

More Related