1 / 10

Psychological Impact of Genetic Counseling for Familial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Psychological Impact of Genetic Counseling for Familial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Dejana Braithwaite, Jon Emery, Fiona Walter, Toby Prevost, Stephen Sutton Presentation by: Jennifer Kyanko. PURPOSE.

hao
Télécharger la présentation

Psychological Impact of Genetic Counseling for Familial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Psychological Impact of Genetic Counseling for Familial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Dejana Braithwaite, Jon Emery, Fiona Walter, Toby Prevost, Stephen Sutton Presentation by: Jennifer Kyanko

  2. PURPOSE • To determine the quality and strength of evidence related to psychological outcomes of genetic counseling for familial cancer due to the identification of a genetic basis of certain types of these cancers.

  3. Genetic Counseling • Definition: Individual counseling aimed at supporting discussion about familial cancer risk and its management, including cancer surveillance and genetic testing. • Can be conducted before or after genetic testing. • Genetic counseling was implemented on patients at risk for breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancer.

  4. Dependent Measures • Anxiety • Distress • Depression • Cancer Worry • Risk Perception • Knowledge

  5. Literature Review • Inception-December 2001 • Methods • Databases included: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cancer-Lit, Cinahl, EMBASE, and the Web of Science Citation Index. • Used terms: breast neoplasms, ovarian neoplasms, colorecatal neoplasms, genetics medical, risk assessment, risk management, genetic counseling, and risk counseling. • 43 studies, 18 extracted for not fitting definition lacking prospective data

  6. Results

  7. Results (continued)

  8. Results (continued)

  9. Potential Moderators • General reaction regarding cancer is high anxiety, distress, depression, worry. • Most may seek accuracy of their perceived risk and more knowledge about the type of cancer. • Mostly women • Few studies conducted with accurate data • Communication strategies

  10. Conclusions • Genetic counseling does not significantly decrease anxiety, distress,depression, cancer worry, nor does it significantly increase risk perception. • Significantly increases knowledge about cancer, cancer prevention, and risk factors

More Related