1 / 47

Syngas Production from Petroleum Coke Gasification

Team Hotel: Russell Cabral, Tomi Damo, Ryan Kosak, Vijeta Patel, Lipi Vahanwala Advisors: Bill Keesom – Jacobs Consultancy Jeffery Perl, PhD – UIC Dept. Of Chemical Engineering March 8, 2011. Syngas Production from Petroleum Coke Gasification. Project Purpose. What we are doing?

hei
Télécharger la présentation

Syngas Production from Petroleum Coke Gasification

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Team Hotel: Russell Cabral, Tomi Damo, Ryan Kosak, Vijeta Patel, Lipi Vahanwala Advisors: Bill Keesom – Jacobs Consultancy Jeffery Perl, PhD – UIC Dept. Of Chemical Engineering March 8, 2011 Syngas Production from Petroleum Coke Gasification

  2. Project Purpose • What we are doing? • Producing syngas from petcoke • Using entrained flow gasifier • Implementing a rigorous syngas cleaning • Why we are doing this? • Making syngas for acetic acid production • Chemical production team specs • CO to H2 molar ratio of 0.409 • CO2 and N2 mixed in http://coalgasificationnews.com/tag/petcoke-gasification/

  3. Overall Block Flow

  4. Recap • Discussed the Shell™ membrane gasifier • Discussed our syngas processes • Sulfur Removal • Claus Process • Water Gas Shift • Flow Sheets • Early Material and Energy Balances

  5. Questions Brought Up Last Time • Why use N2 as a transport gas and not CO2? • How are we absorbing CO2?

  6. Agenda • Recent changes • Using Selexol instead of MDEA • Using the Superclaus • Aspen Simulation • Heat Load Identification • Economics • Aspen Price Evaluator (ICARUS) • Equipment Sizing • Location Update

  7. Flow Sheeting: Overall Process Gasification Sulfur Removal Claus Process Water Gas Shift CO2 Removal

  8. Flow Sheeting: Gasification To Sulfur Removal

  9. Flow Sheeting: Sulfur Removal To Claus To WGS

  10. Flow Sheeting: WGS & CO2 To Chem Production Capture Ready CO2

  11. Flow Sheeting: Claus Process To Superclaus

  12. Flow Sheeting: Claus Cont.

  13. Heat Loads for Claus Plant

  14. Heat Sink Optimization • Stream Pre-heating • Lower Heater / Cooler Duties • Heat Duty and Heat Ex. Cost Tradeoff Cold Furnace Gas Acid Gas Cold Acid Gas Hot Cooler HX Furnace To Claus Catalysts Hot Furnace Gas

  15. Solid Removal Gasification Price $240,306,575 Sulfur Removal Economics and Size Claus Process Final syngas product CO2 Absorption WGS Reactor

  16. Gasification

  17. Solid Removal $670,000 Gasification Price $240,306,575 Sulfur Removal EquipmentCostandSize Cont. Claus Process CO2 Absorption WGS Reactor Final syngas product

  18. Solid Removal

  19. Solid Removal $670,000 Gasification Price $240,306,575 SulfurRemoval $9,600,000 EquipmentCostandSize Cont. Claus Process CO2 Absorption WGS Reactor Final syngas product

  20. Sulfur Removal

  21. Solid Removal $670,000 Gasification Price $240,306,575 Sulfur Removal $9,600,000 Claus Process $12,500,000 EquipmentCostandSize Cont. CO2 Absorption WGS Reactor Final syngas product

  22. Equipment Used in Claus Process

  23. Solid Removal $670,000 Gasification Price $240,306,575 Sulfur Removal $9,600,000 EquipmentCostandSize Cont. Claus Process $12,500,000 CO2 Absorption $35,700,000 WGS Reactor Final syngas product 144 ft3 $360,000

  24. CO2 Absorption

  25. Solid Removal $670,000 Gasification Price $240,306,575 Sulfur Removal $9,600,000 Overall Summary of Capital Cost Claus Process $12,500,000 CO2 Absorption $35,700,000 WGS Reactor 144 ft3 $360,000 Final syngas Product $300,000,000

  26. Other Fixed Cost Capital Cost as of now= $ 300,000,000 Labor Cost as of now = $ 24,000,000

  27. Overall Expenses Capital Cost as of now = $ 300,000,000

  28. Expected Revenue

  29. Sensitivity Analysis

  30. Sensitivity Analysis

  31. Sensitivity Analysis

  32. Sensitivity Analysis

  33. Location • Victoria, Texas • Between Houston and Corpus Christi • 200 acres • Kansas City Southern, Union Pacific, and Burlington Northern Santa Fe railways • Gulf Intracoastal Waterway

  34. Possible Alternatives • Alberta, Canada • Sits on excess petroleum coke from refineries • Is it Economically viable? • Demand • Transportation costs

  35. Conclusion • Overall ASPEN procedure • Gasification • Syngas Clean Up • CO2 Removal • Rough Economics • Location: Victoria, Texas • Possible Change

  36. Next Steps • Final process flow diagram • Control scheme • Optimize economy scale • Revise capital costs • Major equipments list and plant layout • Revise report

  37. Questions?

  38. References • http://fossil.energy.gov/images/programs/sequestration/what_sequestration_lg.jpg • http://coalgasificationnews.com/tag/petcoke-gasification/ • http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-orin-levine/questions-as-mileposts-of_b_448870.html • http://www.chinaep-tech.com/upload/accessary/8173/DZY08092502.pdf • http://www.chemicals-technology.com/projects/gulfpetrochemicalsco/

  39. Report Outline • Final Report: • Executive Summary IP • Discussion IP • Recommendations IP • Appendices • Design Basis: Done • Block Flow Diagram: Done • Process Flow Showing Major Equip.: IP

  40. Report Outline • Appendices (Continued) • Material and Energy Balances: IP • Calculations: IP • Annotated Equip. List: IP • Econ. Eval. Factored from Equip. Costs: IP • Utilities: IP • Conceptual Control Scheme: N/A • Major Equipment Layout: IP

  41. Report Outline • Appendices (Continued) • Distribution and End-use Issues: IP • Constraints Review: IP • Applicable Standards: IP • Project Communications File: IP • Information Sources and References: IP

  42. Energy Balance Around WGS Reactor

  43. Energy BalanceAround WGS Reactor

  44. Heat Loads

  45. CO2 Sequestration • CO2 in our syngas is absorbed on Selexol to be selectively removed • Delete only one CO2 slide.

  46. http://fossil.energy.gov/images/programs/sequestration/what_sequestration_lg.jpghttp://fossil.energy.gov/images/programs/sequestration/what_sequestration_lg.jpg

More Related