1 / 33

New Physics Scenarios in B  hh

New Physics Scenarios in B  hh. April 20, 2005 2nd SuperB Workshop @ Hawaii. Intro: NP in EWP? PQCDF and A K p but A K p 0 ? Why 4th Generation? Results Summary. Observation of Direct CP Violation. A K p = - 0. 114  0.020. 5.7 s. d. p 0. _ d.

jacqui
Télécharger la présentation

New Physics Scenarios in B  hh

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. New Physics Scenarios in B  hh April 20, 20052nd SuperB Workshop @ Hawaii SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  2. Intro: NP in EWP? • PQCDF and AKp • but AKp0 ? • Why 4th Generation? • Results • Summary SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  3. Observation of Direct CP Violation AKp = -0.1140.020 5.7 s SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  4. d p0 _ d b s B- K- u u B0 K+p0 3.6s fromK+p- AKp0 = 0.0490.040 Large EW penguin (Z0) ? New Physics ? SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  5. Buras @ CKM05 SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  6. Buras @ CKM05 Z’ SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  7. Fleischer @ CKM05 Parametrize EWP SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  8. Fleischer @ CKM05 SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  9. Fleischer @ CKM05 Prediction a bit coarse different sign convention SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  10. PQCDF and AKp SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  11. B- K0- 0.01 - 0.01 - 0.02  0.03 B0 K00 - 0.04 - 0.02 0.02  0.14 B- K- 0 0.08 - 0.10 0.04  0.04 B0 K- + 0.04 - 0.16 - 0.11  0.02 But SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  12. PQCDF Factorizable Non Factorizable Annihilation Phase SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  13. Why 4th Generation? Natural for impact on EWP. SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  14. measured from unitarity Set safe Phase SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  15. SM 3 SM 4 new unitarity condition new penguin from t’ SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  16. Tree QCD penguin SM4 naturally impact on EWP EW penguin SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  17. Results SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  18. Arhrib and WS Hattori, Hasuike and Wakaizumi Yanir 4th generation not excluded favored allowed Excluded SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  19. EWP SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  20. d “adjustable” Cancellation btwn fsb andf1 SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  21. Predictions b b SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  22. Brought down for smaller fsb SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  23. New Avg. PDG04 Difficult even at SuperB SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  24. Summary • Difference in AKp0 and AKp suggest • Non-standard EWP • 4th Generation Carries Phase • Naturally impact on EWP • With AKp predicted by PQCDF • account for AKp 0 ~ 0 if • Predictions • - b  sll on high side • - DmBs close to current bound w/ sin2FBs< 0 • -Rc - Rn OK;AK0p0~ 0.05 – 0.1,SK0p0 ~ 0.4 – 0.5 • - ACP in b  sg a fraction of SM value of 0.4% ~ SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  25. Backup SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  26. Factorizable Non Factorizable SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  27. Effective Feynman Rules SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  28. Adjustablility of d SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  29. Less shift forAfK SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  30. Rc - Rn basically OK SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  31. The Case of FSI Problem vs SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  32. FSI + 4TH generation PEW leakage from to and from to have similar behavior No existence of a region of the parameter space where the asymmetries fit the experimental data SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

  33. SuperB Workshop in Hawaii George W.S. Hou

More Related