1 / 11

Remote Sensing in Natural Hazard Monitoring

Remote Sensing in Natural Hazard Monitoring Bruce H. Ramsay*, William Y. Tseng* , George Stephen*, Robert Fennimore*, and Fernando Sotelo** *NOAA/NESDIS, Washington, D.C. 20233, USA **Litton PRC, GOES Data Distribution System Support Contractor, Washington, D.C. 20233, USA Table of Contents

jana
Télécharger la présentation

Remote Sensing in Natural Hazard Monitoring

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Remote Sensing in Natural Hazard Monitoring Bruce H. Ramsay*, William Y. Tseng* , George Stephen*, Robert Fennimore*, and Fernando Sotelo** *NOAA/NESDIS, Washington, D.C. 20233, USA **Litton PRC, GOES Data Distribution System Support Contractor, Washington, D.C. 20233, USA

  2. Table of Contents • Introduction • OSEI Purpose • Support Policies • Defining a Natural Hazard/Significant Event • The Process • Identification of Significant Events • Notification Protocols • The Acquisition of Imagery • The Analysis of Imagery • The Production of Imagery • Quality Control

  3. Table of Contents (Cont’d) • Storage and Dissemination of Data • Website Control and File Management • The Daily Report • Recent Event Supports and Examples

  4. Introduction • OSEI Purpose • To produce and analyze remotely sensed imagery, in near real-time, from satellite sensors, for the identification and monitoring of short-term natural and anthropogenic hazards. • Imagery available in NOAA: NOAA-AVHRR, GOES, GMS, DMSP-SSM/I, TOMS-EP, METEOSAT, RADARSAT SAR, and SeaWiFS • Support Policies • Operational support • All locations in the world • Near real-time and quick turn around after an event

  5. Introduction (Cont’d) • Defining a Natural Hazard/Significant Event • “Significant” depends upon one’s point of view. • “Significant Events” are defined not just in context with situations which produce spectacular remotely-sensed images, but also with those that have a severe impact to lives and property. • Typical Significant Events: Fires, Smoke, Volcanic Eruptions and Ash Plumes, Tropical Cyclones, Floods, Oil Spills, Snow Cover or Ice, Dust Storms, Tornado Outbreaks, Storms, and Red Tides.

  6. The Process • Identify Significant Events • Define Significance and Classify the “Significance Threshold (ST)” from ST0 (lowest) to ST3 (highest). • Notify the OSEI Team Members • Acquire, Analyze and Produce Imagery • Quality Control • Store, Disseminate and Archive Data • Daily Operational Significant Event Support Report

  7. Recent Event Supports and Examples • Fires: Southeast Asia, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Central America, Guyana, Indonesia, Mexico, the Philippines, and the United States • Dust: Africa, East Asia, MidEast and the Pacific Ocean • Floods: Afghanistan, Argentina, Kenya, Pakistan, Peru, Somalia, and the United States • Snow Cover or Ice: The Antarctic, and the Arctic, Canada, and the United States

  8. Recent Event Supports and Examples (Cont’d) • Storms, Tornado, or Tropical Cyclones: Canada, Europe, Japan, India, Russia and Georgia, the Philippines, the United States, etc. • Smoke: SE Asia, Japan, South America, Italy, and the United States • Volcanic Eruptions: Hawaii, Soufriere Hills, Kamchatka Peninsula (near Bering Sea), Montserrat, Pavlof, and El Arenal (in Costa Rica) • Oil Spills: Coastal oceans off Pakistan, Japan, and Paraguay • Red Tides: Hong Kong

  9. Future Plans • Implement 7X24 support. • Implement “list serve” capability. • Develop automate data acquisition/event identification/classification system - Hazard Mapping System (HMS). • Develop a simple and more friendly image processing software.

  10. Discussion and Conclusion • All imagery supports are emphasized on the operational objective, rather than on the scientific purpose. • Since the turn-around time of imagery support for an event is about three hours, a detailed study of the imagery is impossible. Therefore, a bias in the event location and reality is inevitable.

  11. Discussion and Conclusion (Cont’d) • Ground truth data are usually not available when the imagery is issued and disseminated to the customer. • The imagery support, however, has still been proved to be a very useful, economical, and effective method for identifying and monitoring larger-scaled events.

More Related