1 / 15

CLINICAL PLACEMENTS FOR MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGISTS WORK IN PROGRESS

THE CANADIAN SOCIETY FOR MEDICAL LABORATORY SCIENCE. CLINICAL PLACEMENTS FOR MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGISTS WORK IN PROGRESS. CLINICAL EDUCATION - CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES MARCH 28, 2004. THE STUDY. CLINICAL PLACEMENTS FOR MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGISTS COSTS, BENEFITS AND ALTERNATIVES

janina
Télécharger la présentation

CLINICAL PLACEMENTS FOR MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGISTS WORK IN PROGRESS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. THE CANADIAN SOCIETY FOR MEDICAL LABORATORY SCIENCE CLINICAL PLACEMENTS FORMEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGISTSWORK IN PROGRESS CLINICAL EDUCATION - CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES MARCH 28, 2004

  2. THE STUDY CLINICAL PLACEMENTS FOR MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGISTS COSTS, BENEFITS AND ALTERNATIVES February - September 2004 Conducted by the CSMLS Funded by Health Canada

  3. THE INFORMATION GAPS • incomplete information on MLT programs • partial information on costs • acknowledged need for data on health professions • urgent need to address human resources issues through educational processes

  4. RESEARCH QUESTIONS 1. Which models for clinical placements are currently in use in Canadian medical laboratory programs? 2. Do the different models for clinical placement produce discernible and significant differences in student performance? 3. What are the costs and benefits of (and possible alternatives for) clinical placements in the education of Canadian MLTs?

  5. PROJECT OUTLINE Phase 1 • Mailed surveys to program directors • Outcomes • table and details of program variations • identification of program models • preliminary observations on student outcomes • selection of sites for Phase 2

  6. PROJECT OUTLINE Phase 2 • Mailed surveys to laboratory directors, clinical instructors and students and five sites • Site visits and interviews at up to 5 sites • Outcomes • multiple perspectives on the costs and benefits of clinical education • a C&B algorithm that includes intangibles, observations of stakeholders, correlations between models and student outcomes

  7. PHASE 1 : CHALLENGES • encompassing MLT & specialties • within-program variations • programs in transition • differences in titles and terminology • defining ‘student outcomes’ for this study

  8. CRITERIA FOR MODELS • program length & type • length & timing of clinical placement • use of simulations • assignment of clinical instructors • compensation to clinical sites

  9. RESPONDENTS’ CONCERNS • Insufficient numbers of sites • Inability to expand program • Fluctuations in numbers of places: • Withdrawal of sites • Unavailability of teaching technologists • Geographical issues for students • Concerns about quality of learning experience

  10. RESPONDENTS’ WISH LIST • More sites and more student places! • Funding for teaching sites • Alternatives to on-site placement • More support for clinical instructors and sites • Better integration of theory and practice • Reorganization away from discipline orientation • Changing timing of clinical placement in the program • Longer/shorter rotations

  11. COSTS & BENEFITSA CAVEAT TANGIBLE INTANGIBLE COSTS BENEFITS

  12. COSTS & BENEFITS. . . TANGIBLE INTANGIBLE BENEFITS EMPLOYERCOSTS

  13. COSTS & BENEFITS. . . Benefits to students, clinical instructors, sites, non-teaching staff • “vital” • “invaluable” • “essential” • “irreplaceable” • “The benefits outweigh any costs incurred”

  14. AVAILABILITY OF FINDINGS Phase 1: From CSMLS after April 1, 2004 Phase 2 From CSMLS after October 1, 2004

More Related