1 / 22

Credit: 3ws

Quantifying the impact of environmental variables upon catch-per-unit-effort of the blue shark ( Prionace glauca ) in the w estern English Channel. J. D. Mitchell* † , K. J. Collins † , P. I. Miller ‡ , L.A. Suberg † † University of Southampton, ‡ Plymouth Marine Laboratory. Credit: 3ws.

janine
Télécharger la présentation

Credit: 3ws

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Quantifying the impact of environmental variables upon catch-per-unit-effort of the blue shark (Prionaceglauca) in the western English Channel J. D.Mitchell*†, K. J. Collins†, P. I. Miller‡, L.A. Suberg†† University of Southampton, ‡ Plymouth Marine Laboratory Credit: 3ws Credit: James R.D. Scott * Corresponding author. Email: jonathanmitchell023@gmail.com

  2. Contents • Introduction • Aims and Objectives • Research Importance • Methods • Results • Research Limitations • Wider Implications for Fisheries Management • Summary • References Source: Compagno, (1984)

  3. Introduction • Migratory pelagic species • Single North Atlantic population1, segregated by age and sex2,3 • Mostly juvenile females in W. English Channel between June-October4,5 • Migrations driven by temperature, productivity and prey availability5,6 • Blue sharks targeted by Shark Angling Club of GB (SACGB) recreational rod and reel fishery, based in Looe, Cornwall Source: Kohler et al. (1998) (1) Kohler et al., 1998; (2) Stevens, 1990; (3) Nakano and Stevens, 2009; (4) Stevens, 1976; (5) Vas, 1990; (6) Nakano and Seki, 2003

  4. Credit: Baz Richardson

  5. Credit: The Portbyhan Hotel

  6. Aims and Objectives • To quantify how environmental variables affected CPUE of blue sharkin the western English Channel fishery between June-September 1998-2011 • Sea Surface Temperature (SST), surface chlorophyll a concentration (CHL), and tidal mixing front density • Generalised Additive Models (GAM) utilized • First study to analyse these relationships for blue sharks in shelf waters, and in North Atlantic Credit: J Pierson Source: Simpson et al. (1981)

  7. Why does this research matter? • High bycatchin North Atlantic Tuna and Swordfish longline fisheries7 • Export of shark fins to Asia highly lucrative • Recent growth in landings – 3,028 tonnes in 1990 to 37,178 tonnes in 20108 • Declines of 5-60% recorded in parts of North Atlantic in the last 30years9,10,11 • This study aimed to improve knowledge of environmental preferences and fisheries interactions of this species Credit: Shawn Heinrichs Credit: Alex Hofford (7) Buencuerpoet al., 1998; (8) ICCAT, 2012; (9) Campanaet al., 2006; (10) Baum et al., 2003; (11) Aires-da-Silva et al., 2008

  8. Study Location • SACGB fishing area in western English Channel • 16-40 km south of Looe, ~500 km-2 area UK FRANCE

  9. Method • GAM quantified the effect of SST, CHL, and front density (predictor variables) upon CPUE (response variable) • Monthly CPUE from SACGB fishing log • Spatio-temporally averaged environmental data – remote sensing • Second GAM analysed time-lagged effect of front density upon CPUE LOOE

  10. Credit: Total Fishing Credit: SACGB Credit: Fishing Cornwall

  11. Results - Model Variance

  12. Sea Surface Temperature • Maximum CPUE at 16.7⁰C • Peak CPUE between 16-17⁰C also recorded in North Pacific12,13 and South Atlantic14 commercial fisheries, using GAMs • Approximately central in 13-18⁰C optimum thermal range proposed for this species15 (12) Bigelow et al., 1999; (13) Walsh and Kleiber, 2001; (14) Carvalhoet al., 2011; (15) Casey, 1982

  13. Surface Chlorophyll a Concentration • Positive effect on CPUE – peak at 1.77mg m-3 • Similar peak CPUE at 2.10mg m-3observed in South Atlantic longline fishery14 • However, unexpected decline in CPUE at higher CHL - larger error levels and bloom datapoints? (14) Carvalho et al., 2011

  14. Front Density • Negative linear relationship opposite to that expected • Frontal strength positively affected CPUE in North Pacific fisheries12, and distribution and residence time of blue shark in Celtic Sea & Bay of Biscay16 • Widespread high productivity of English Channel potential cause of unexpected trend?? • Time-lagged effects… (12) Bigelow et al., 1999; (16) Queirozet al., 2012

  15. Time-lagged Front Density • Explained12.6% of model deviance and significant • Overall positive (but variable) effect on CPUE • Time-lag between evolution of front and accumulation of productivity, and attraction of planktivorous fish, then predators? • Increasing frontal energy at time-lags of 1 week and 1 month previously observed to increase blue shark CPUE12 (12) Bigelow et al., 1999

  16. Research Limitations • Fisheries bias – misrepresenting true environmental preferences • Effort not fully standardised – no. of anglers and trip length • Coarse resolution of spatio-temporally averaged data unable to represent effects of fine-scale features • GAM ‘n’ and confidence intervals Credit: Andy Jones

  17. Wider Implications for Fisheries Management • Improved knowledge of blue shark biology and ecology – environmental preferences • In combination with population dynamics and migration data offers potential for effective fisheries management • Remote sensing based management effective for reducing loggerhead turtle bycatch17 and managing Atlantic bluefintuna18 • Can similar strategies be applied to blue sharks? Source: TurtleWatch (NOAA) (17) Howell et al., 2008; (18) Druon, 2010

  18. Summary • Aim – To quantify the impact of SST, CHL and front density upon blue shark CPUE in a recreational fishery • Outcome – Environmental variables had a substantial and variable impact upon CPUE – reflecting environmental preferences • Importance – Provided insights into blue shark biology and ecology – vital for future development of fisheries management models • Take-home message– Integrated remote sensing based management models could be a powerful tool for halting declines in North Atlantic population

  19. Acknowledgments • The staff and fishermen of the SACGB for providing CPUE data, and to charter vessel skippers M. Collings, D. Bond, and P. Curtis, for allowing observation of the angling process • The Natural Environment Research Council Earth Observation Data Acquisition and Analysis Service (NEODAAS) for supplying satellite data for this study

  20. References • Kohler, N. E., Casey, J. G. & Turner, P. A. (1998). NMFS cooperative shark tagging program, 1962-93: an atlas of shark tag and recapture data. Marine Fisheries Review 60, 1-87. • Stevens, J. D. (1990). Further results from a tagging study of pelagic sharks in the north-east Atlantic. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom70, 707-720. • Nakano, H. & Stevens, J. D. (2009). The biology and ecology of the blue shark, Prionaceglauca. In Sharks of the Open Ocean: Biology, Fisheries and Conservation (Camhi, M. D., Pikitch, E. K. & Babcock, E. A., eds), pp. 140-151. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. • Stevens, J. D. (1976). First results of shark tagging in the north-east Atlantic 1972-75. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 56, 929-937. • Vas, P. (1990). The abundance of the blue shark, Prionaceglauca, in the western English Channel. Environmental Biology of Fishes 29, 209-225. • Nakano, H. & Seki, M. P. (2003). Synopsis of biological data on the blue shark, (PrionaceglaucaLinnaeus). Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Agency of Japan 6, 18-55. • Buencuerpo, V., Rios, S. & Moron, J. (1998). Pelagic sharks associated with the swordfish, Xiphiasgladius, fishery in the eastern North Atlantic Ocean and the Strait of Gibraltar. Fishery Bulletin96, 667–685. • ICCAT (2012). ICCAT Report 2010-2011: Executive Summary: Sharks.Available at http://www.iccat.es/Documents/SCRS/ExecSum/SHK_EN.pdf (last accessed 12 April 2013). • Campana, S. E., Marks, L., Joyce, W. & Kohler, N. E. (2006). Effects of recreational and commercial fishing on blue sharks (Prionaceglauca) in Atlantic Canada, with inferences on the North Atlantic population. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63, 670-682.

  21. References cont… • Baum, J. K., Myers, R. A., Kehler, D. G., Worm, B., Harley, S. J. & Doherty, P. A. (2003). Collapse and conservation of shark populations in the north-west Atlantic. Science. 299, 389-392. • Aires-da-Silva, A. M., Hoey, J. J. & Gallucci, V. F. (2008). A historical index of abundance for the blue shark (Prionaceglauca) in the western North Atlantic. Fisheries Research 92, 41-52. • Bigelow, K. A., Boggs, C. H. & He, X. (1999). Environmental effects on swordfish and blue shark catch rates in the US North Pacific longline fishery. Fisheries Oceanography 8, 178-198. • Walsh, W. A. & Kleiber, P. (2001). Generalized additive model and regression tree analyses of blue shark (Prionaceglauca) catch rates in the Hawaii-based commercial longline fishery. Fisheries Research 53, 115-131. • Carvalho, F. C., Murie, D. J., Hazin, F. H. V., Hazin, H. G., Leite-Mourato, B. & Burgess, G. H. (2011). Spatial predictions of blue shark (Prionaceglauca) catch rate and catch probability of juveniles in the south-west Atlantic. ICES Journal of Marine Science 68, 890-900. • Casey, J. G. (1982). The blue shark, Prionaceglauca. In Fish Distribution (Grosslein, M. D. & Azarovitz, T. R., eds), pp. 45-48. New York, NY: New York Sea Grant Institute. • Queiroz, N., Humphries, N. E., Noble, L. R., Santos, A. M. & Sims, D. W. (2012). Spatial dynamics and expanded vertical niche of blue sharks in oceanographic fronts reveal habitat targets for conservation. PLoS One 7. • Howell, E. A., Kobayashi, D. R., Parker, D. M., Balazs, G. H. & Polovina, J. J. (2008). TurtleWatch: a tool to aid in the by-catch reduction of loggerhead turtles Carettacaretta in the Hawaii-based pelagic longline fishery. Endangered Species Research5, 267–278. • Druon, J-N. (2010). Habitat mapping of the Atlantic bluefin tuna derived from satellite data: its potential as a tool for the sustainable management of pelagic fisheries. Marine Policy 34, 293-297.

  22. Credit: Chris Fallows

More Related