1 / 20

Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation. E951Target Station Set-Up Graphite Targets. ATJ Graphite Energy Deposition – Front ATJ Rod. Temperature Profile in FRONT ATJ Graphite induced by 1.7 TP and beam spot 1.7 x 0.7 mm rms.

janus
Télécharger la présentation

Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory TargetryE951 ATJ Graphite TargetExperiment vs. Simulation

  2. E951Target Station Set-Up Graphite Targets

  3. ATJ Graphite Energy Deposition – Front ATJ Rod

  4. Temperature Profile in FRONT ATJ Graphiteinduced by 1.7 TP and beam spot 1.7 x 0.7 mm rms

  5. ATJ Graphite Strain Data

  6. ATJ Graphite Strain DataVerification of fundamental modes of target response Record of strains in the middle of the graphite rod (left) shows a bending frequency between 380-390 Hz The prediction of the detailed model that implements the supporting/holding fixtures of the target as close to the real setting as possible, predicts a bending frequency of 395 Hz Also from the record, the axial “ringing” of the target has a period of 260 to 265 microseconds. The fundamental axial period T=2L/c (where L is target rod length and c is speed of sound) is approximately 261 microseconds The radial “ringing” on the other hand, which from theory is calculated at 150 KHz (or 6.625 microsecs period), is visible only in the strain record filtered by the 500 KHz acquisition

  7. ATJ Graphite Strain Data

  8. ATJ Graphite Strain Data

  9. ATJ Graphite Strain Data

  10. ATJ Graphite Strain Data

  11. ATJ Graphite Strain Data - Predictions

  12. ATJ Graphite Strain Data - Predictions

  13. Rear ATJ Graphite Strain Data Intensity = 1.7 TP ; Beam Spot = 1.7mm x 0.7mm

  14. Rear ATJ Graphite Strain Data - PredictionsIntensity = 1.7 TP ; Beam Spot = 1.7mm x 0.7mm Rear

  15. Rear ATJ Graphite Strain Data Predictions vs. ExperimentIntensity = 1.7 TP ; Beam Spot = 1.7mm x 0.7mm

  16. Rear ATJ Graphite Strain Data - PredictionsIntensity = 3.0 TP ; Beam Spot = 2.5 x 1.0 mm

  17. Rear ATJ Graphite Strain Data Prediction vs. Experiment

  18. Front ATJ Graphite Strain Data Strains in the center of rod 180 deg apart/Targets offset from beam 0.2 inches

  19. Carbon-Carbon Strain Data

  20. Rear Carbon-Carbon Strain Data

More Related