80 likes | 84 Vues
Introduction of Strip Module Working Group. Tony Affolder and Ingrid Gregor. Inner Tracker Steering Committee (ITK-SC) and global planning. We are here.
E N D
Introduction of Strip Module Working Group Tony Affolder and Ingrid Gregor
Inner Tracker Steering Committee (ITK-SC) and global planning We are here Working groups are to develop specifications, steer prototype work and evaluate costing and procurement, work out an organisation for production. Also provide a conduit of info between community and the ITK-SC. We need to provide options/best guesses of costing, requirements by Dec 2011 for LoI • Schedule for ITK phase II (as of June 2011) • LoI: middle of 2012 • TDR: Dec 2014 • Get into Production: 2015 • Part production and assembly: 2016-2018 • Macro Assembly:2019-2020 • Test: 2021 • Install: 2022
What is the charge of Strip Module Working Group (SMWG)? So I guess we are the on-detector electronics group • ASICs (ABCN130, HCC, powering) • Hybrids • Modules • Electrical Bus • Powering (DC-DC and serial powering (SP)) • End of Structure packaging • GBT-versatile link, controller electronics provided by readout WG • On-detector DCS (providing info into DCS) • Global DCS definitions in readout WG • Irradiations • As of now, it looks like all irradiations (sensors, materials, modules) are in the SMWG
Organization • First question is how we want to organise? • The charge is too big to be structured top-down • We feel we need to keep the individual meetings that have been naturally occurring, adding more when needed (either to hit deadlines, before submissions, or to fill gaps) • Please let Ingrid and I know of such meeting so we have some idea what is already covered • We know of: readout architecture, stave module building, and the general stave meeting • The SMWG meetings are intended to bring the community together, to bring information from these smaller meetings to the larger audience, and to touch base on a regular basis to plan ITK-SC communications/AUW • We would suggest meeting every 4 weeks for now, but can increase frequency when needed (for instance, the run-up to the next ASIC submission • We propose to have a less formal structure with a list of people who can present on the various sections of the working group • Today’s indico is a first guess on that list, which will be altered by suggestions from the community • If useful (for promotion cases/job searches/CV) or desired, we could set official leaders for the various sub-topics
Strip Module Working Group Meeting • 9 distinct topics on the general agenda (5 of which would have at least geometrical differences for a chosen substructure) • Up to 19 presentations if everyone reports • To have these meeting finish in a reasonable time and to keep them productive and friendly • Please keep formal talks to a minimum; the community is usually already aware of basic components, advantages/disadvantages of the different global choices, and what you have been doing long term • But of course feel free to highlight issues, especially if pertinent to the results you are presenting • Plan on module session during AUW being the place for more formal presentations • Please focus on technical/schedule issues, on what is new since the last meeting and on will be coming up on the near term • Highlight issues which either go across the topics in our meeting and even more importantly, issues that cross working groups • Please indicate if you think important issues are not being covered within the working group or in the community at large • As this is first time this particular set of people get together, it is understandable if a bit more background is needed today and it runs long
When To Meet? • People in -8, -5, UTC, +1, +9 time zones • Trying to get the start between 5 am and 10 pm locally everywhere, there is only three options: 2 pm CERN, 8 pm CERN or 9 pm CERN • So is this meeting time ok for everyone or would the evening in Europe be ok? • Knowing that it is uncomfortable for Japan and West Coast US • Is every 4 weeks sufficient for the rate of progress? Would suggest yes, especially for the next few months (summer holidays)
Mailing List • Group is far too large for ad-hoc mailing lists to work (People have definitely been left off the list for this meeting) • We started a open CERN mailing list: • atlas-upgrade-itk-strip-module • Will send a test message after this meeting • If see you anyone missing or if you are not subscribed, please feel free to add to the list yourself
Near Term Dates of Importance • July 28: ITK-SC meeting focused on strip modules • Requested to show current status, near term plans, a first pass at cost and schedule to production, and a list of open issues to address • Last talk today is a discussion of what we should put together. We’ll do our best to circulate a draft to the full mailing list prior to the meeting • August 11: ITK-SC + working group convenor plenary meeting with progress reports focussing on issues correct working groups • Oct 6-7: ITK-SC + working group convenors plenary meeting focused on ITK- phase 2 LoI prep with additional discussion on phase 1 pixel strategy and on baseline layout and costiing