1 / 5

RUSNANO’s Scientific and Technological Expertise

RUSNANO’s Scientific and Technological Expertise. Sergey Kaluzhnyi, Head of the Scientific and Technological Expertise Department. May 2010. Scientific & Technological Evaluation.

joelle-wall
Télécharger la présentation

RUSNANO’s Scientific and Technological Expertise

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RUSNANO’s Scientific and Technological Expertise Sergey Kaluzhnyi, Head of the Scientific and Technological Expertise Department May 2010

  2. Scientific & Technological Evaluation Scientific & Technological Evaluation includes scientific assessment by experts, Production &Technology Examination and Patent Assessment Assessment Checks Assessment by internal experts • Scientific basis • Technical feasibility • Relation to nanotechnology Assessment by independent external experts Science & Technology Council • Project documentation • Available and required resources • Site requirements • Ecological constrains Production & Technology Examination Patent Assessment • Patent protection in Russia and internationally • Patent clearance Production & Technology Examination and Patent Assessment are conducted by leading independent consultants

  3. Experts Physics USA 5% 5% Materials Germany 30% Chemistry 15% Israel Total 527 experts Life sciences France Measurement & UK analysis methodology 19% 19% Other 26% Scientific assessment is conducted by internal and external experts Internal experts RUSNANO’s Scientific and Technological Expertise Department employs 12 internal experts specializing in various areas (nanomaterials, chemistry, life sciences, micorelectronics, physics, catalysts etc.) External experts • Currently RUSNANO has 527 accredited external experts: • 459 Russian and 68 foreign experts • 80% of experts hold Doctor of Science and 19% PhD degrees External experts by areas of expertise Foreign experts by country 6% 8% 12% Total 68 experts 56% 18%

  4. Advantages of Scientific & Technological Evaluation in RUSNANO The strongest expertise in Russia and one of most qualified in the world gives the unique opportunity to decrease risks and to increase returns of approved projects Unbiased approach • Chinese wall between investment team, internal and external experts to avoid conflict of interests • External experts are anonymous to investment team Rigorous experts selection Scientific and metrological base • Selection criteria based on: • Experience • Hirsch index • Number of patents • Involves a number of institutions: • Leading Russian scientific centers • Leading Russian technological centers • International centers Strong points of Expertise Consensus decision • Each project is evaluated by several experts: • Internal experts • At least 3 external experts • Working group of the Science and Technology Council

  5. Science & Technology Council Science & Technology Council makes final decision on scientific and technological component of the project Board members Chairman: Mikhail V. Alfimov Head of Photochemistry center Member of the Russian academy of sciences • Science & Technology Council is formed by 19 high-profile Russian scientists and senior representatives of the leading Russian research institutions, universities and hi-tech holdings: • 2 rectors of universities • 13heads and senior representatives of the leading Russian research centers • 3 senior representatives of Russian hi-tech holdings • 1 senior government official • Before the Council session • Appointment of the working group consisting of 3 Council members • Review of the project by the working group and issue of the final conclusion by the working group • During the Council session • Examination of the final conclusion of the working group by the Council • Voting on the project by the Council members • Majority of the Council members’ votes (>50%) is required to get the final approval of a project by the Council Board project review process

More Related