1 / 17

SESSION 356 Road Assessment Programs: New Approaches to Highway Safety Programs January 22, 2007

SESSION 356 Road Assessment Programs: New Approaches to Highway Safety Programs January 22, 2007. Imagine a Day When …. Road authorities can benchmark the relative risk of road segment in their jurisdiction Resources are allocated based on those risks

juana
Télécharger la présentation

SESSION 356 Road Assessment Programs: New Approaches to Highway Safety Programs January 22, 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SESSION 356Road Assessment Programs:New Approaches to Highway Safety ProgramsJanuary 22, 2007

  2. Imagine a Day When… • Road authorities can benchmark the relative risk of road segment in their jurisdiction • Resources are allocated based on those risks • Motorists can take these risks into account

  3. John Dawson – iRAP • Peter Kissinger – AAA Foundation • Doug Harwood – MRI • Larry Tibbits - MDOT

  4. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety • Established in 1947 • 501 (c) 3 Not-For-Profit • Research Affiliate of AAA and AAA Motor Clubs • North American Focus

  5. Funded through the generosity of and its members

  6. Mission • Identify traffic safety problems • Foster research that seeks solutions • Disseminate information and educational materials

  7. usRAP Background • Unacceptably high socio-economic toll from traffic crashes • Culture of complacency • Under-investment in safety • Road safety management can be enhanced with more money & new tools • Politics vs. evidence-based decisions

  8. usRAP Background • Data limitations in many agencies • Variation in analysis & evaluation tools • Insufficient appreciation of relative contribution of vehicle, operator & road factors • No system to assess road safety risks • Little transparency

  9. usRAP • Inspired by EuroRAP • Collaborate with EuroRAP and AusRAP through iRAP

  10. usRAP Objectives • Help cut death and serious injury rates through systematic risk assessment • Ensure that strategic decisions are linked to risk assessment • Forge partnerships among those responsible for a safe road system

  11. usRAP Objectives(continued) • Better information and guidance to motorists • Improved crash data record systems

  12. usRAP Pilot • Initiated in 2004 • Phase I pilot report (IA & MI) released 2006 • Phase II (FL & NJ) ongoing • Phase III to be initiated in 2007 • Continued expansion • RPS development • Risk communication

  13. usRAP Team • Sponsor: • AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety • FIA Foundation for the Automobile & Society • iRAP • Research Team: • Midwest Research Institute • Iowa State University

  14. usRAP Advisory Panel • AASHTO • AHU & RSF • ATSSA • Auto clubs • FHWA • ITE • NACE • Local highway agencies • State highway agencies

  15. usRAP Protocols • Risk Mapping • Maps of death and serious injury risk for road users • Road Protection Score • Star rating based on inspecting road features that protect users from serious injury or death • Performance Tracking • Comparisons of safety performance for roadway sections over time

  16. Opportunities for Collaboration • AAAFTS partnerships with AASHTO, State DOTs, and FHWA • Periodic benchmarking • Internal • Public • AAAFTS funding assistance to enhance road safety • AAA support in state legislatures

  17. For more information, please go to:www.usrap.us

More Related