1 / 18

Field-Reversed Configuration Fusion Power Plants

Field-Reversed Configuration Fusion Power Plants. John F. Santarius University of Wisconsin Workshop on Status and Promising Directions for FRC Research PPPL June 8-9, 1999. Collaborators. University of Wisconsin Canh Nguyen Laila El-Guebaly Gil Emmert Doug Henderson

kaloni
Télécharger la présentation

Field-Reversed Configuration Fusion Power Plants

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Field-Reversed Configuration Fusion Power Plants John F. Santarius University of Wisconsin Workshop on Status and Promising Directions for FRC Research PPPL June 8-9, 1999

  2. Collaborators • University of Wisconsin • Canh Nguyen Laila El-Guebaly • Gil Emmert Doug Henderson • Hesham Khater Jerry Kulcinski • Elsayed Mogahed Sergei Ryzhkov • Mohamed Sawan • University of Washington • Loren Steinhauer • University of Illinois • George Miley JFS 1999

  3. FRC Power Plant Applications JFS 1999

  4. Field-Reversed Mirror (D-T, Condit, et al., LLNL, 1976) University of Wisconsin JFS 1999

  5. SAFFIRE Field-Reversed Mirror(D-3He, Miley, et al., Univ. of Illinois, 1978) JFS 1999

  6. ARTEMIS Field-Reversed Configuration(D-3He, Momota, et al., NIFS, 1992) JFS 1999

  7. A D-T FRC Engineering Scoping StudyIs In Progress • Collaboration of Universities of Wisconsin, Washington, and Illinois. • Objective: To investigate critical engineering issues for D-T FRC Power Plants. • Systems analysis • Tritium-breeding blanket design • Radiation shielding and damage • Activation, safety, and environment • Plasma modeling • Current drive • Plasma-surface interactions JFS 1999

  8. FRC Plasma Power Flows Differ Significantly from Tokamak Power Flows • Power density can be very high due to its b2B4 scaling, but this does not necessarily imply an unmanageable first-wall heat flux. • Charged-particle power transports from internal plasmoid to edge region and then out ends of fusion core. • Expanded flux tube in end chamber reduces heat and particle fluxes, so charged-particle transport power only slightly impacts the first wall. • Mainly bremsstrahlung power contributes to first-wall surface heat. • Relatively small peaking factor along axis for bremsstrahlung and neutrons. JFS 1999

  9. Linear Geometry Greatly Facilitates Engineering • Flow of charged particles to end plate reduces first-wall surface heat flux. • Modules containing blanket, shield, and magnet can be replaced as single units due to their moderate mass. • Maintenance should be easier and improve reliability and availability. • Considerable flexibility exists for placement of pipes, manifolds, etc. • Direct conversion of transport power to electricity could increase net efficiency. University of Wisconsin JFS 1999

  10. FRC Geometry Greatly Reduces the ‘Divertor’ Problem • MHD tilt instability, probably the closest FRC analogue to a tokamak disruption, will send the plasma along the axis and into the end chamber, where measures can be more easily taken to mitigate and localize the effects. • Steady-state heat flux is broadly spread and due almost exclusively to bremsstrahlung radiation power. • Edge region vacuum pumps well and should shield the core plasma from most impurities.. JFS 1999

  11. Compact Toroids Might Provide both Fueling and Current Drive for FRC’s • Compact toroids carry particles and current at 100’s of km/s. • Small spheromaks merging with a large FRC will relax to an FRC with a slightly larger current. • Added helicity must balance resistive decay of the plasma current. • Added particles should balance particle transport losses. • Spheromaks would be injected at ~1 Hz. • Either vertical or horizontal geometry should work. • Key question is power required for self-consistent fueling and current drive. JFS 1999

  12. D-T FRC Engineering Scoping StudyKey Assumptions • Rotating magnetic field (RMF) current drive. • Steady-state operation. • He/Li20/SiC for coolant/breeder/structure of first wall and blanket. • Superconducting magnets, possibly high-Tc. • Thermal energy conversion only. • Horizontal (radial) maintenance of blanket/shield/magnet modules (~5 m length). • ARIES economic model assumptions. JFS 1999

  13. Liquid-Walled FRC Power Plants Might Achieve Extremely High Power Densities • The APEX study uses the FRC as a key alternate to the tokamak. • Thick liquid walls (Li, Flibe, LiPb, LiSn) would attenuate neutrons and serve as • Tritium breeder • Radiation shield • Heat transfer medium JFS 1999

  14. FRC Magnets Fit Well within Superconducting State-of-the-Art • Magnetic fields for both D-T and D-3He FRC power-plant coils are usually projected to be <6 T. • Externally generated field within fusion core nearly equals the field on the coils  increased power density (B4). • MHD pressure drop for liquid-metal coolants will require less pumping power than in tokamaks. • High-temperature superconductors presently operate at relevant current densities at 5 T in short lengths. • High-temperature superconductors should be more resistant to quenching and may, therefore, reduce the required radiation shield. JFS 1999

  15. Pulsed FRC Power Plants • High FRC power density gives flexibility that would help accommodate changes necessitated by pulsing. • High-temperature superconductors would facilitate a pulsed design. • Neutron-fluence limited, therefore unaffected by pulsing, rather than heat-flux limited. • More robust against quenching due to pulsed fields. • Might be fueled by periodic CT injection for fueling and current drive. • Also potentially for inducing instability for ash removal and plasma MHD conversion? • Transport implications? JFS 1999

  16. D-3He Fuel Could Make Good Use of theHigh Power Density Capability of FRC’s • D-T fueled innovative concepts become limited by first-wall neutron or surface heat loads well before they reach b or B-field limits. • D-T fueled FRC’s optimize at B  3 T. • D-3He needs a factor of ~80 above D-T fusion power densities. • Fusion power density scales as b2B4. • Superconducting magnets can reach at least 20 T. • Potential power-density improvement by increasing B-field to limits is (20/3)^4 ~ 2000 ! JFS 1999

  17. Proliferation-Resistant FRC Power PlantMay Be Possible (Probably Requires D-3He) JFS 1999

  18. Conclusions • From a fusion energy development perspective, FRC’s occupy the important position of leading the b-driven, engineering-attractiveness route. • The cylindrical geometry and disruption-free operation of D-T FRC’s should allow them to overcome the major engineering obstacles facing D-T tokamaks. • FRC’s match D-3He fuel well, and the combination potentially could outperform D-T. JFS 1999

More Related