1 / 47

METS and IMS-CP

METS and IMS-CP. Convergence and Divergence Rick Beaubien UC Berkeley Library. What is METS ?. Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard An XML schema-based specification for encoding “hub” documents for materials whose content is digital .

kareem
Télécharger la présentation

METS and IMS-CP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. METS and IMS-CP Convergence and Divergence Rick Beaubien UC Berkeley Library

  2. What is METS? • Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard • An XML schema-based specification for encoding “hub” documents for materials whose content is digital. • Hub doc draws together potentially dispersed but related files and data

  3. What is METS? • METS uses XML to provide a vocabulary and syntax for identifying the digital components that together comprise a digital object, for specifying the location of these components, and for expressing their structural relationships.

  4. METS History • Pre-MOA2 (pre-1997) • 1994-1996: UCB begins to digitize Bancroft Library’s archival collections • MOA2.dtd (1997-2001) • Preliminary digital object standard • Just image and text content • METS.xsd (2001-now) • MOA2 expanded beyond image and text content

  5. Materials Targeted • Pictorial, manuscript & print materials • Goal: enable creation of integral digital analogues to library’s primary, physical holdings • Sound Recordings • Film/Video • Born digital • Material of any format library might be asked to archive • Websites, Learning objects, etc.

  6. Uses of METS • Transfer Syntax • OAIS: SIP • Dissemination Syntax • OAIS: DIP • Archiving Syntax • OAIS: AIP

  7. Who’s Using METS • Institutions • USA: • California Digital Library, UC Berkeley, Berkeley Art Museum, RLG, Stanford, U. Chicago, OCLC, U. Florida, Harvard, MIT, NYU, Philadelphia Museum of Art, Library of Congress • International: • Unversity of Alberta, British Library, Oxford University Library, National Library of Wales, University of Graz, Austria, Gottingen Digitaliserungs-Zentrum • Projected: Australia, New Zealand, Japan

  8. Who’s Using METS • Repository/Collection Management Systems • Fedora (METS import) • Greenstone • DSpace • Commercial • docWorks

  9. What’s Available • Selection of currently available METS objects and METS supported sites.

  10. Linked Communities • Rich assortment of digital library materials is becoming available in METS format. • Potential content pool for learning objects • Learning objects are being deposited in libraries. • Libraries archiving learning objects in METS-based repositories.

  11. METS Anatomy • <metsHdr> METS Header • <dmdSec> Descriptive Metadata • <amdSec> Admin Metadata • <fileSec> Content File Inventory • <structMap> Structural Map(s) • <structLink> Structural Links • <behaviorSec> Behaviors

  12. mets metsHdr dmdSec amdSec fileSec fileGrp file structMap div structLink behaviorSec manifest metadata organizations organization metadata item metadata resources resource metadata file Convergence

  13. Divergence • Content vs. Presentation • mets: tends to make strong distinction between content and presentation • manifest: presentation is content • Result: • mets <fileSec> and manifest <resources> only superficially similar • mets segregates presentation in optional <behaviorSec>

  14. Implications • mets to manifest transformations • easy if content is browser ready (jpeg, gif) • more difficult if content is not: • transformation must intuit appropriate presentation from content type (example: MrSid) • manifest to mets transformations • easy just to wrap manifest in mets • difficult to turn manifest into mets

  15. Other issues: metadata • No METS-defined element set. • METS Board endorses schemas that represent community standards. • LOM will be endorsed • Lossless mapping problems: • Some METS extension schemas fuller than LOM • LOM has learning object specific md

  16. Other issues: profiles • METS is intentionally very flexible • few controlled vocabularies • many structural options • Problem: crosswalk can’t account for all options • Solution: profiles • Machine actionable profiles not yet supported

  17. Union? • Complete union between METS and IMS-CP may be difficult • both standards now have momentum behind them • Basis for easier accommodation? • Adjust METS <fileSec> so it can be used like manifest <resources> element. • Add manifest style <resources> element to <mets>? • Look to METS as applied to WebSites

  18. Links • METS Home Page. http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/ • METS Registry. http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/mets/registry/ • METS Diagram. http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/mets/diagram

  19. Links • UCB Candidate METS Profiles. http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/mets/ucbprofiles/ • MOA2 Project. http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/moa2/ • FEDORA. http://www.fedora.info/ • Greenstone. http://www.greenstone.org/cgi-bin/library

  20. Links • Dspace. http://dspace.mit.edu/ • DocWorks. http://www.ccs-gmbh.de/ • OAIS Reference Model. http://www.rlg.org/longterm/oais.html

More Related