1 / 30

Quarkonium production at ATLAS

Quarkonium production at ATLAS. Erez Etzion Tel-Aviv University on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration. QWG-6, Nara, Dec. 2008. Motivation. Large number of J/ ψ -> μ + μ - and  -> μ + μ - decays is expected at the LHC; Alignment and calibration of trigger & tracking.

keenan
Télécharger la présentation

Quarkonium production at ATLAS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Quarkonium production at ATLAS Erez Etzion Tel-Aviv University on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration QWG-6, Nara, Dec. 2008

  2. Motivation • Large number of J/ψ->μ+ μ- and  ->μ+ μ- decays is expected at the LHC; • Alignment and calibration of trigger & tracking. • Test bed for QCD calculations. • Prompt quarkonia a main source of background to other B processes. • Production was described via the Color Singlet Model. • Inconsistency with the Tevatron Xsection =>Color Octet Model suggested. • COM failed to predict quarkonia polarization dependence on its PT. • Alternative suggestions κT factorization. • ATLAS Physics plan is starting in summer 2009. • Key player in the early data taking. • At low luminosity can lower PT threshold to collect large sample. • ATLAS reach for PT >TEVATRON => enhance its analysis power. E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  3. Tevatron ATLAS 1x106 J/y CDF 1.1 fb-1 60 pb-1 4.2x105  D0 1.3 fb-1 85 pb-1 Expected data at early LHC • ATLAS expects to achieve the current Tevatron onia yield at a couple of months with LHC at low luminosity ~1000 J/y’s per hour • 60 pb-1 should allow for competitive measurement of quarkonium polarization, with enough statistics in the crucial high pT region. • High pT data is important. Tevatron suffers from statistics in this region. • With 10 pb-1 ATLAS will be able to measure ratios of onia cross-sections, which can help to constrain NRQCD octet matrix elements. E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  4. Quarkonium production cross-section Tevatron (@1.8 TeV) MC Onia production pT and the differential cross-section contributions from color singlet, color octet and singlet/octet of  . The dominant contribution at high pT range is the 3S1 color octet fragmentation (dashed dotted line). J/Ψ production cross section  production cross section LHC MC (@14 TeV) E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  5. Previousmeasurements  polarization (You have already seen these figures many time this meeting ..) D0 July 19,2007 http://www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results/prelim/B/B50/ CDF April 4, 2007 http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0638v1/ CDF D0 kT factorization J/ψ polarization - CDF RUN II E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  6. ATLAS Detector Muon DetectorsTile CalorimeterLiquid Argon Calorimeters T h e A T L A S E x p e r i m e n t 22 m 46 m Toroid MagnetsSolenoid MagnetSCT TrackerPixel DetectorTRT Tracker E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  7. The Trigger system • LVL1 • hardware-based, identifies Regions of Interest (RoI) for further processing • LVL2 • Confirms LVL1 trigger • precision muon chamber and inner detector measurements in LVL1 RoI • EF • refines LVL2 selection using offline-like algorithms • full event, alignment and calibration data available hardware software E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  8. η  Toroid pT of muons from different processes Muon chambers layout and curved muon tracks Level-1: muon trigger TGC (endcap) RPC (barrel) E. Etzion QWG-6

  9. B-physics trigger strategy: level-2 • B-Physics is accounted for 5 ÷ 10% of total trigger resources: it must be fast, efficient and selective • Semi-leptonic decays: di-muon final state Two Level-2 di-muon trigger algorithms: • Topological trigger Starts with a di- trigger at level-1 + confirmation at level-2 • Standalone  reconstruction • Combined  reconstruction • TrigDiMuon Starts with a single  trigger at level-1/level-2 and search for two • in a wider Region of Interest ( for low luminosity period) E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  10. Tracking in Muon Spectrometer • The momentum of the muons is determined from the curvatures of their tracks in a toroidal magnetic field. • Muon tracks are identified and measured after their passage through ~2m of material. ATLAS Endcap • Track measurement with =60m intrinsic resolution in three precision measurement stations (MDT). ATLAS Barrel E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  11. Tracking in the Inner Detector Pixel Detectors -The silicon sensors closest to the collision point. (Resolution: σφ=12 μm, σz=66 μm) Strip Detectors – additional layers of silicon narrow strips aimed to provide additional position measurements. (5cm<radii<50cm) Resolution :σφ=16μm,σz=580μm Transition Radiation Tracker (TRT)- collections of gas-wire drift detectors consist of 4mm-straw tubes with thin wires in the center. (50<radii<100 cm). Resolution :σ=170μm per straw . PT resolution The silicon pixel and strip detectors provide about 10 azimuthal position measurements, each with precision of 10 - 20 microns. The TRT provides about 36 azimuthal position measurements, each with precision of 150 microns. ATLAS Impact par. resolution J/ψ secondary vtx resolution E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  12. Low mass sources J/ψ ATLAS Upsilon E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  13. Vertex separation • ‘Pseudo-proper time’ cut of <0.2 ps gives prompt J/y efficiency of 95% with 5% contamination • Cut of >0.15 ps gives bbJ/yX efficiency of 80% with 20% prompt J/y contamination Prompt ATLAS Indirect E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  14. Low mass sources (after selection) ATLAS J/ψ Upsilon E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  15. J/y ¡ Reconstruction of prompt quarkonia From all m+m- pairs in J/y mass range, ~96% of generated events reconstructed Mass resolution 54 MeV. • Can reconstruct muons from Inner Detector tracks, muon spectrometer standalone, or combined muon information From all m+m- pairs in ¡ mass range, ~92% of generated events reconstructed. Mass resolution 168 MeV. With cut on Pt(mu)>10GeV + Background Corresponding to 10 pb-1

  16. Reconstructed onia transverse momentum • Studies of high pT onia production are important as the high momenta accessible by the LHC and beyond the reach of the Tevatron • Acceptance of onia is ratio of MC generated to reconstructed in each pT bin • Onia acceptance rises to a plateau at >12 GeV • Acceptance of ¡ much better at low pT’s due to mass J/y(m6m4) acceptance ¡(m6m4) acceptance Errors on simulated statistics correspond to approximately 10 days of low luminosity data-taking E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  17. Onia acceptance with pseudorapidity • J/y muons produced close in DR, hence J/y distribution reflects single muon acceptance • Situation for ¡somewhat different: • ¡ have dip at central h due to decay kinematics (muon h’s themselves do not have dip) • DR broader for ¡,so smearing is greater • Reconstructed ¡’s follow MC closely – still have best acceptance in endcap region, but losses in barrel have smaller fluctuations J/y(m6m4) acceptance ¡(m6m4) acceptance

  18. Oniadecay muon angular separation ∆R DR defined as =(Dh2+Df2)1/2 • Muons from J/y have typical DR<0.5 • Effective cut-off at DR>0.6 due to J/y kinematics • In contrast, muons from ¡ are free to be produced with large separation DR differences have implications for c reconstruction and studies of hadronic activity from onia ∆R (m6m4) E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  19. cdecays cc→J/Ψ+γevents • For J/y, ~30% of total cross-section from cc feed-down • For ¡, ~50% of total cross-section from cb feed-down • Interested in c decays to J/y or ¡ and a photon: low c reconstruction efficiency due to the difficulty in retrieving this photon • Preliminary studies suggest we can recover few % of those c events from reconstructed J/y’s or ¡ cc2(3556) cc1(3510) • mmg-mm invariant mass difference determines whether cc0, cc1 or cc2 was reconstructed • Currently see little defined structure, resolution can be dramatically improved by using conversions cc0(3415) g angular distribution g PT M(µµγ)-M(µµ) 19 M(MeV)

  20. Polarization definition J/Ψ rest frame • Polarizations studies were using the angular distribution of the daughter particles, m+, produced in the particle decay. • The angle, θ*, is measured with respect to the direction of the movement in the ATLAS lab frame. • The polarization parameter α, defined as • Transverse polarization a=+1refers to helicity±1. • Longitudinal (helicity0) polarization a=-1. • Un-polarized production consists of equal fractions of helicity states +1, 0 and -1, and corresponds to α= 0. J/Ψ lab direction E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  21. Angulardistribution of J/Ψ decay J/Ψ rest frame J/Ψ lab direction Long Trans • One way to measure the polarization is to fit it to the weighted sum of two MC samples produced with transversally and longitudinally polarization.

  22. Polarization derivation D-is the measured sample T-is the transversally polarized content β - is the transversally polarized fraction L-is the longitudinally polarized content B-is the background sample N 1,2 - are the Normalization parameters 9-12 13-15 a of the sample was set to 0.5 12-13 Statistics of 6 fb-1 15-17 17-21 >21 E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  23. cosθ*acceptance and di-muon trigger • Using di-muon trigger, both muons from J/Ψ must have relatively large pT. • => Severally affects the polarization angle distribution. • In the J/ Ψ pT range, a fraction of ~60% (m6m4 trig.) of the sample is lost. • cosθ*~0 - events where both muons have roughly equal pT. • While for cosθ*=±1 one muon’s pT should be very high compared to the second one. Originally flat (geometrical acceptation) E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  24. Single muon m10 trigger to the rescue • Using a single m10 trigger: • Second muon can be reconstructed offline from track (>0.5 GeV pT) • |cos q*| ~ 1 corresponds to a configuration where one muon is fast, the other slow • Provides similar pT range of onia to m6m4 configuration • Go from a distribution in m6m4 (blue curve) to that in m10 (black curve) m6m4 m10m1 J/y ¡ • Invariant mass distributions in m10 suffer from larger, but manageable, backgrounds. E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  25. ‘MEASURED’ DISTRIBUTIONS ACCEPTANCE (from Monte Carlo predictions) Combined polarization measurement 9-12 GeV 12-13 GeV 13-15 GeV ATLAS ATLAS 17-21 GeV pT>21 GeV 15-17 GeV m6m4 sample in red m10+track sample in blue E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  26. E = ±0.03 E = ±0.01 E = ±0.01 Err = ±0.03 Err = ±0.03 Err = ±0.17 E = ±0.29 E = ±0.05 E = ±0.04 E = ±0.14 E = ±0.18 E = ±0.13 Err = ±0.04 Err = ±0.06 Err = ±0.04 E = ±0.05 E = ±0.06 E = ±0.09 Combined polarization measurement -II • Measured distributions from m6m4 and m10 are corrected for their individual acceptances and efficiencies • Both samples normalised to each other using overlapping high pT events • Use pre-defined acceptance mask to combine the two (now non-overlapping) datasets and make a fit to the corrected distributions (total errors shown below) • Fit polarization in bins of pT ATLAS ATLAS LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE SAMPLE UNPOLARISED SAMPLE E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  27. Splash event from first LHC run E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  28. LHC Problems in the inter-connects • 1/10,000 interconnects between magnets Caused the problem E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  29. Millions of Cosmic ray events • Reconstruction in good shape for different magnet and detector configurations • • Conditions are continuously updated E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

  30. Summary - J/Ψ and ¡ in early ATLAS data • ATLAS is designed to probe the O( 1 TeV) scale but will have some useful measurements in the heavy quarks physics sector. • ATLAS is running and took (cosmic data) study trigger and tracking. • LHC Physics program is expected at summer 2009 (starting @ 10 TeV) • The Quarkonia ->m+m-- key player in the analysis of LHC early data. • Useful for event quality monitoring ,calibration and alignment. • Directly produced J/Ψ are main background to J/Ψ produced in B hadrons (key channel in the B Physics program). • Interesting to study the polarization PT dependence. • With its high PT reach, can improve the existing measurements. • The errors on J/y polarisation with 10 pb-1of data are expected to be of similar magnitude to that of Tevatron1 fb-1of data, (in the important high pT area). • Similar results can be achieved for ¡ but need 100 pb-1of data to reach same precision, due to increase backgrounds. • Its going to be interesting! E. Etzion QWG-6 December 2008

More Related