1 / 25

SURFACE WAVE ELIMINATION BY INTERFEROMETRY AND ADAPTIVE SUBTRACTION

SURFACE WAVE ELIMINATION BY INTERFEROMETRY AND ADAPTIVE SUBTRACTION. YANWEI XUE University of Utah. Outline. Surface Wave Problem & Remedy Theory of Interferometric Filtering 2D Field Data Results 3D Field Data Results Conclusions. Problem: Surface waves blur the seismograms.

lester-hunt
Télécharger la présentation

SURFACE WAVE ELIMINATION BY INTERFEROMETRY AND ADAPTIVE SUBTRACTION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SURFACE WAVE ELIMINATION BY INTERFEROMETRY AND ADAPTIVE SUBTRACTION YANWEI XUE University of Utah

  2. Outline • Surface Wave Problem & Remedy • Theory of Interferometric Filtering • 2D Field Data Results • 3D Field Data Results • Conclusions

  3. Problem: Surface waves blur the seismograms. A seismogram with surface waves and reflections Reflection waves 0 Time (s) Surface waves 2.0 Receiver (m) 0 7200 surf ref = d + d d Solution: Filter the surface waves by Non-Linear Filter (NLF) and interferometric method

  4. Outline • Surface Wave Problem & Remedy • Theory of Interferometric Prediction • 2D Field Data Results • 3D Field Data Results • Conclusions

  5. Near-OffsetSurf. Wave Mid-OffsetSurf. Wave Near-OffsetSurf. Wave A B A B B A A B A B B A B A Prediction of Surface Waves

  6. Basic Strategy ^ s Input data d d Interferometric prediction ^ ^ ^ d s ^ ^ ^ Least squares subtraction r No Output data Yes Surface waves are removed completely?

  7. 0 Time (s) 2.0 Receiver (m) 0 3600 Nonlinear Local Filter

  8. Outline • Surface Wave Problem & Remedy • Theory of Interferometric Filtering • 2D Field Data Results • 3D Field Data Results • Conclusions

  9. 0 Time (s) 2.0 Receiver (m) 0 3600 Raw Data

  10. 0 Time (s) 2.0 Receiver (m) 0 3600 Remove Surface Waves by NLF

  11. 0 Time (s) 2.0 Receiver (m) 0 3600 Remove Surface Waves by Int.+NLF

  12. 0 Time (s) 2.0 Receiver (m) 0 3600 Raw Data

  13. 0 Time (s) 2.0 Receiver (m) 0 3600 Remove Surface Waves by F-K

  14. 0 Time (s) 2.0 Receiver (m) 0 3600 Remove Surface Waves by Int.+NLF

  15. 0 Time (s) 2.0 Receiver (m) 0 3600 Surface Waves Predicted by F-K

  16. 0 Time (s) 2.0 Receiver (m) 0 3600 Surface Waves Predicted by Int.+NLF

  17. Outline • Surface Wave Problem & Remedy • Theory of Interferometric Filtering • 2D Field Data Results • 3D Field Data Results • Conclusions

  18. 0 0 Time (s) Time (s) 4.0 4.0 0 0 Receiver(m) 5000 Receiver (m) 5000 Line 9 Before and After Removal of Surface Waves

  19. 0 0 Time (s) Time (s) 4.0 4.0 0 0 Receiver (m) 5000 Receiver (m) 5000 Line 11 Before and After Removal of Surface Waves

  20. 0 0 Time (s) Time (s) 4.0 4.0 0 0 Receiver (m) 5000 Receiver (m) 5000 Line 13 Before and After Removal of Surface Waves

  21. 0 0 Time (s) Time (s) 4.0 4.0 0 0 Receiver (m) 5000 Receiver (m) 5000 Line 14 Before and After Removal of Surface Waves

  22. Outline • Surface Wave Problem & Remedy • Theory of Interferometric Filtering • 2D Field Data Results • 3D Field Data Results • Conclusions

  23. Conclusions • This approach is effective for surface wave removal in both 2D and 3D cases. • Advantages: • Better than FK method for irregular acquisition geometry. • No need for a near surface velocity model. • Limitations: • Sensitive to the choice of NLF parameters. • Parameter selection can be expensive. • Future Work: • Eliminate need for non-linear local filter. • More tests on 3D data.

  24. Acknowledgement I thank the sponsors of 2006 UTAM consortium for their financial support.

  25. THANKS!

More Related