1 / 17

GET RID OF GREENWASH – a FLAGSHIP CAMPAIGN? General Assembly Brussels, November 14, 2013

GET RID OF GREENWASH – a FLAGSHIP CAMPAIGN? General Assembly Brussels, November 14, 2013. Rational behind proposed flagship campaign. Green claims often used as a marketing tool in order to influence consumer decision to buy a product “Green” products are often sold at a higher price

lkoski
Télécharger la présentation

GET RID OF GREENWASH – a FLAGSHIP CAMPAIGN? General Assembly Brussels, November 14, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GET RID OF GREENWASH – a FLAGSHIP CAMPAIGN? General Assembly Brussels, November 14, 2013

  2. Rational behind proposed flagship campaign • Green claims often used as a marketing tool in order to influence consumer decision to buy a product • “Green” products are often sold at a higher price • If green claims are misleading, consumer detriment is not only economical, but can de-motivate consumers to engage in sustainable consumption in the future • Numerous examples of misleading green claims in Europe

  3. Low trust among consumers of environmental claims • Eurobarometer 367 (July 2013): • Only a bit more than half of EU citizens generally trust producers‘ claims about the environmental performance of their products • Study by Consumer Focus (2009): • 58% of consumers think a lot of companies pretend to be green just to charge higher prices

  4. Example 1 (appliances): „Very energy saving refrigerator“ • The consumer center Hamburg (a vzbv member) took legal action against retailer Media Markt in 2010 • Media Markt used the slogan “very energy saving” for a refrigerator/freezer which was of energy efficiency class “A”. • This had been considered to be misleading as 308 out of 543 appliances already belonged to class “A+” and almost 17% of all available appliances on the German market belonged even to energy efficiency class “A++”. • As the consumer center Hamburg won the case, the retailer was not allowed to use this advertisement anymore

  5. Example 2 (appliances): Which? Test of small electrical appliances • Which? Performed own tests on small appliances • E.g. Bosch steam generator used more water and consumed more energy in its „eco mode“ that on „max steam“ • No legal action taken

  6. Example 3 (textiles):Lidl not allowed to use term „natural product“ for textiles made of lyocell • Lidl used to advertise textiles made of lyocell as a „natural product“ • In order to produce lyocell, large amounts of chemicals and energy are necessary • Verbraucherzentrale Hamburg issued a notice of warning against Lidl • VZHH demanded the company to cease and desist from the advertising –> Lidl signed declaration • If Lidl fails to comply, VZHH might take case to court

  7. Example 4 (toilet cleaners): Tesco naturally (UK) – test by which? • As a result of which? investigation, Tesco is removing claim „no phosphates“

  8. Example 5 (cars): Opel advertisement „Insignia ecoFlex“: loads of fun of driving & low fuel consumption (2009) • VZBV admonished Opel as manufacturer advertised its model „Insignia ecoFlex“ with „climate friendly CO2 emissions“ • Opel agreed not to use this slogan in the future

  9. No EU legislation harmonising environmental marketing • Green claims partly covered by specific legislation prohibiting the misleading use of the claims used (e.g. organic labels, energy labelling, etc.) • Outside those aspects covered by specific EU legislation, general provisions of the Directive on Unfair Commercial Practices are to be used when assessing environmental claims • UCPD does not include specific provisions on misleading environmental claims: • It is the general clauses that apply, meaning that the assessment of a misleading green claim must be done on a case-by-case basis • Full harmonization effect of UCPD does not allow MS to adopt more ambitious provisions, e.g. through general prohibitions on the use of certain terms (e.g. Eco-friendly)

  10. Objectives of campaign: Consumers are not being ripped-off by misleading green claims • (1) To stop the use of blatantly misleading green claims (concrete products/claims identified at a later stage); • (2) To show possibilities for redress; • (3) To make consumers aware how to recognize a misleading green claim; • (4) To work with national authorities or businesses where relevant to further target misleading green claims; • (5) To lobby for more ambitious guidelines under the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD) to effectively combat misleading green claims

  11. Strategy of flagship campaign – EU level • Collecting examples of misleading green claims • Quantification of consumer harm in cases of misleading green claims; • Enforcement campaign: coordinated enforcement actions (injunctions, complaints to national authorities, negotiations with business etc.) • Assembling information on redress possibilities in each country; • Push for appropriate EU regulatory action (e.g. revision of Unfair Commercial Practices Directive)

  12. Strategy of flagship campaign – Member State level • Preparation of evidence: provide consumer complaints, cases, potentially surveys to „build the case“ • Participate in coordinated enforcement activities – taking injunction actions to courts or national enforcement activities • Inform BEUC secretariat about concrete possibilities for consumers to get redress in those cases • Help develop communication material • Do media work at national level • Participate in awareness building strategy and activities how to recognize misleading green claims

  13. Annex

  14. What is a „misleading green claim“? (p. 37 UCPD Guidance Document) • The expressions "environmental claims" or "green claims" refer to the practice of suggesting or otherwise creating the impression that a product or a service, is environmentally friendly or is less damaging to the environment than competing goods or services. • When such claims are not true or cannot be verified this practice can be described as 'greenwashing'.

  15. Example 6 (cars): Lexus ad banned in the UK (2007) • Ad for Lexus RX 400h car (192 g CO2/km): „High performance. Low emissions. Zero guilt.“ • Advertising Standards Authority decided that even though the car‘s CO2 emissions were low compared to similar cars, absolute emissions are still very high and this would give a misleading impression that this car is environmentally friendly

  16. Example of „possible“ misleading ads (no legal action taken) from 2012 • New Renault Espace ad (2012) – „Nature will reward you. Taxes as well“ • Similar case to Lexus example in the UK from 2007? • Even though the car‘s CO2 emissions are „relatively“ low compared to similar cars, absolute emissions are still high and this give a misleading impression that this car is environmentally friendly • Average emissions of all cars in EU in 2012: 132 g CO2/km • Average emissions target for all cars in the EU in 2020: 95 g CO2/km

  17. Thank you www.beuc.eu – environment@beuc.eu

More Related