1 / 18

T-DAB Receiver testing

T-DAB Receiver testing. Richard Drinkwater Radiocommunications Agency. Introduction. Complaints received from DAB listeners about poor reception Is this due to poor service coverage or poorly performing receivers?

maalik
Télécharger la présentation

T-DAB Receiver testing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. T-DAB Receiver testing Richard Drinkwater Radiocommunications Agency

  2. Introduction • Complaints received from DAB listeners about poor reception • Is this due to poor service coverage or poorly performing receivers? • Receiver tests performed to establish the sensitivity of a selection of current domestic receivers

  3. Technology • DAB technology • Benefits • More rugged transmission format • Much less spectrum usage – capable of carrying 6 quality audio stereo programmes in 1.5MHz against 2.2MHz per programme for complete mainland UK FM coverage • Drawbacks • More complicated (= expensive) receivers for the listeners

  4. UK Spectrum Occupancy FM v DAB

  5. BS 50248:2001 test criteria • BS EN 50248:2001, “Characteristics of DAB receivers” • Minimum power of -81dB(mW) for a BER of 10-4 at the convolutional decoder output of the receiver (VHF and L-band)

  6. Methodology • Objective tests were not possible without connections to internal circuitry • Subjective tests were performed which established the minimum field-strength at which audio impairments (more than 1 click in 5 seconds) were heard

  7. Test set-up Measuring voltage V and height X enables a known field strength (V/m) to be established at the receiver under test

  8. GTEM! cell

  9. Results on channel 12D (229.075 MHz)…

  10. …graphically

  11. which means… For a field strength of 45dBµV/m, the receiver input power at 222MHz would be-77dBm if the receiver had a 50Ω input impedance, and a dipole antenna Tested receivers did not, and the standard is written in antenna port power terms, so it is impossible to equate the tests with the standard

  12. Receivers tested • DAB #1 • Miniature personal receiver using earphone lead as antenna • DAB #2 • Portable receiver with rod antenna • DAB #3 • Portable stereo unit with rod antenna • DAB #4 • Miniature personal receiver using rod antenna

  13. Service planning criteria • National DAB services • Edge of service area is considered to be when field strength is 58dB(µV/m) at 10m above ground level for 99% locations, 99% of the time • Field strength at 1.5m agl is very approximately 10dB lower than at 10m agl in open terrain • In a single frequency network, other transmitters within about 70km (246us) add to the signal available to the receiver

  14. Portable equipment • Inefficient antennas • Low antenna height • Body shielding • Building shielding and reflections • Shielding attenuates the signal • Local reflections tend to add to the signal received

  15. Analysis of test method • Strengths • Straightforward, repeatable method using GTEM! cell • Weaknesses • Subjective assessment • No multipath reception distortion • Incomparable with BS test method

  16. Some thoughts Assuming a field strength at the edge of the service area of approximately 48dBµV/m at 1.5m agl, it would appear that the tested receivers would work in free space conditions. Due to shielding effects there is probably inadequate margin in sensitivity (in 3 out of the 4 tested receivers) for satisfactory reception under everyday usage conditions.

  17. Possible solutions • Very low power fill in transmitters • Relatively inexpensive solution • No international clearance required • Improve receiver antenna performance • Particularly the match to input circuitry

  18. Contacts • richard.drinkwater@ra.gsi.gov.uk • richard.drinkwater@ofcom.org.uk RTCG Radiocommunications Agency Whyteleafe Hill Whyteleafe Surrey CR3 0YY +44 (0)20 8655 8300

More Related