1 / 12

Agape Experiment: Testing Group Telepathy (statistical study in progress)

Agape Experiment: Testing Group Telepathy (statistical study in progress). Dr Bernard Auriol (EuroPA meeting, November 2003). A Group Experiment. H 1 : The rate of hits is increased by redundancy due to vote. H 0 : The rate of hits is not increased by vote. Protocol

madeline-boone
Télécharger la présentation

Agape Experiment: Testing Group Telepathy (statistical study in progress)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Agape Experiment:Testing Group Telepathy(statistical study in progress) Dr Bernard Auriol (EuroPA meeting, November 2003)

  2. A Group Experiment H1 : The rate of hits is increased by redundancy due to vote. H0 : The rate of hits is not increased by vote. Protocol A transmitting group (1-16 senders) and a receiving group (1-16 voters) were located in two isolate rooms. Everything was monitored and recorded by computers.

  3. Target’s type : either pictures (2) or words (3 or 5) Participants : any voluntary (either sheep or goat) sender or receiver role generally chosen by the participants 274 female (2/3) 145 male (1/3) 240 telepathic ESP group sessions: 27,845 collective trials (250,000 individual trials)

  4. Results

  5. Variance of success got by vote(30 trials per salvo)

  6. Variance of intervals To reach a better evaluation, we note the interval ( number of misses) between two consecutive hits, and check the varianceof these intervals (random or not ?). 

  7. Variance of the intervals * ==> p < 0.05

  8. Conclusionof the hypothesis test This type of group experiment did not increase the psi-hitting rate regarding either individual answers or answers obtained by vote.  No improvement of the Signal to Noise ratio (S/N) (redundancy got from majority vote is not effective).  Variance was significantly weak with two targets. But strong for three targets and normal for five. Are these variations explainable by socio-psychological attitudes ?

  9. Prospective Covariance Analysis of success cases

  10. Collective trials significantly different from chance (p <0.05)

  11. The significant variables were selected thanks to a stepwise procedure and kept under a threshold of 5%. We get significant parameters with a p-value close to 0.0001

  12. Sybil(Systematic bilocality) We plan to devise a protocol to test the following hypothesis: We can hope for success with groups only if we build sub-groups so that there is more affinity between receivers and senders than among receivers. A simple sociometric test should be enough to achieve this, provided the results for each sessions help to distribute the roles of transmitter and receiver.

More Related