1 / 11

Coda attenuation analysis of Zagreb area, Croatia

Coda attenuation analysis of Zagreb area, Croatia. Iva Dasović , Marijan Herak and Davorka Herak Andrija Mohorovičić Geophysical Institute Department of Geophysics, Faculty of Science University of Zagreb. Supported by. The Foundation of the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts.

marnin
Télécharger la présentation

Coda attenuation analysis of Zagreb area, Croatia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Coda attenuation analysis of Zagreb area, Croatia Iva Dasović, Marijan Herak and Davorka Herak Andrija Mohorovičić Geophysical Institute Department of Geophysics, Faculty of Science University of Zagreb Supported by The Foundation of the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts

  2. Seismicity of Croatia – Croatian Earthquake Catalogue: 373 BC - 2010

  3. Stations and earthquakes PTJ: 2004-2010, 70 earthquakes ZAG: 2001-2010, 71 earthquakes Δ < 120 km, ML ≥ 2.0, h < 30 km

  4. The single backscattering model • The coda-Q method (Aki and Chouet, 1975) Envelope Attenuation Source function Propagation term, m=2 for body waves Linear regression Linear regression Q0= Qc(f = f0= 1Hz)

  5. Procedure tWL = time window length (30 s) tL = lapse time→ shifted windows tS = S-wave travel time Band-pass filters [fl,fu] and central frequencies f Dasović et al. (accepted for publication in Stud. Geophys. Geod.)

  6. Results: Qc (tL, f) Smoothed values of Qc (tL, f) in contour-graph

  7. Q0 and n depend on tL 40 80 120 160 200 240 h (km) 40 80 120 160 200 240 h (km) h = ½ vst

  8. Q0 and n in coastal Croatia (the External Dinarides) Dasović et al. (accepted for publication in Stud. Geophys. Geod.)

  9. Q0 and n depend on tL – different referent frequency f0? Dasović et al. (accepted for publication in Stud. Geophys. Geod.)

  10. lnPGA475vs. Q0→ 11 stations: coastal region + Zagreb area ρ =correlation coefficient p = statistically significant confidence level PGA475 = peak ground acceleration for the return period of 475 yr at the station site R = radius equivalent to tL for average vs = 3.8 km/s

  11. Conclusions • Q0 and n indicate highly heterogeneous medium • Coda-Q is lapse time dependent • A marked change of Q0 and n at about 100 km depth (upper mantle) • Different choice of f0 might “eliminate” lapse time dependence of Qc • Very convincing correlation between Q0 and PGA475 (seismicity)

More Related