1 / 8

Travel Task Force (TTF)

Travel Task Force (TTF). Background Mochida’s memo (6-1-06) creates task force (chopey, hensley, lebbin, polansky, wermager [chair]): Review current funding level policy and make recommendation to continue/not continue policy ($1000/ faculty)

martha
Télécharger la présentation

Travel Task Force (TTF)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Travel Task Force (TTF) Background Mochida’s memo (6-1-06) creates task force(chopey, hensley, lebbin, polansky, wermager [chair]): Review current funding level policy and make recommendation to continue/not continue policy ($1000/ faculty) If changing current policy, recommend a different funding methodology/formula

  2. Travel Task Force (TTF) • TTF reviewed 2003-04 and 2004-05 travel spreadsheets • Admin and faculty drew from the same fund • In 2004-5, 1 person expended $10,069 or 6% of total funds

  3. Travel Task Force Recommendations • * Separate travel into 2 line item funds: • Admin travel • Faculty travel • * Establish a faculty committee to manage the Faculty travel fund • * Retain $50,000 base for FY 05-06 • Reimburse unexpended monies equitably to faculty whose travel was not fully funded • Faculty committee to revise current “Criteria” * Approved by Mochida, 6/26/06 email

  4. Proposal from ULC • I met with Mochida late on 7/21/06 • ULC concerned TTF proposed faculty committee to manage Faculty fund: • Delay processing of requests • Create inequalities in funding • Propose: $1000/faculty designated to each Dept to decide how to distribute travel funds equitably

  5. ULC’s Rationale • Dept Heads already sign off on all travel requests so no delay in processing requests • Disputes minimized by Dept members agreeing to their Dept’s internal decision-making on travel requests

  6. TTF Comments • Clear submission guidelines/deadlines won’t delay processing of requests • Clear, precise, transparent guidelines will minimize disputes • $1000/faculty is simple/easy, but does not provide Extra support for new librarians/ professional work on national/state committees

  7. Options?? • Faculty committee to monitor funds • Depts manage their own funds • Stay with current model • Hybrid – combinations of above

  8. Some Issues • Allocate based on merit? • Allocate same $$ to everyone? • Allocate more to new, non-tenured librarians? • What types of travel justify increased funding?

More Related