1 / 3

Objectives

To estimate our subject's aerobic capacity based upon ventilation and heart rates using a bicycle Confirm Garg's Model based on a static lifting task Evaluate HR, Borg’s Rating and V O2 as valid predictors of workload. Objectives. Results. Max V O2 = 2.42. Max V O2 = 3.53. Max HR = 192.

masako
Télécharger la présentation

Objectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. To estimate our subject's aerobic capacity based upon ventilation and heart rates using a bicycle Confirm Garg's Model based on a static lifting task Evaluate HR, Borg’s Rating and VO2 as valid predictors of workload Objectives

  2. Results Max VO2 = 2.42 Max VO2 = 3.53 Max HR = 192 Estimation of the Ventilation • Ventilation = 0.54 + 1.49 number of blocks

  3. Conclusions • For the static lifting, the heart rate increases faster than the dynamic. • The estimation of E should be more accurate, for we are estimating from the real data. The Garg’s model is a generalized model. • The heart rate and the VO2 correlate linearly with energy expenditure. They both seem to be valid measures of workload. • Borg's RPE is not as good a valid measure of workload as heart rate or VO2 .

More Related