1 / 19

Coordinating ARRA and ED Facts – An Update for PESC

Coordinating ARRA and ED Facts – An Update for PESC. Ross Santy Director, ED Facts U. S. Department of Education October 20, 2009. ED Fact s Purpose. Primary goal: Consolidate collection and storage of information on K-12 education programs. Benefit: Reduced burden on states

media
Télécharger la présentation

Coordinating ARRA and ED Facts – An Update for PESC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Coordinating ARRA and EDFacts – An Update for PESC Ross Santy Director, EDFacts U. S. Department of Education October 20, 2009

  2. EDFacts Purpose • Primary goal: Consolidate collection and storage of information on K-12 education programs. • Benefit: Reduced burden on states • Benefit: Improved data governance at ED • Benefit: Access to cross-program data • Challenge: Change in process for SEA reporting • Challenge: Cultural change @ ED

  3. Mandatory EDFacts Reporting: SY 2008-09 • ED will monitor timeliness against usage dates (included in submission plans). • Quarterly messages to Chiefs concerning EDFacts deadlines, expectations, and status of state reporting • Partner Support resources will be focused on state assistance • EDFacts data will be used to maximum extent to answer Consolidated State Performance Report questions

  4. Federal K-12 Program Reporting in 2009 CSPR EDFacts (Title I, Title III, IDEA, GFSA, etc) ARRA- 1512 SFSF Phase II App. Race to the Top App.

  5. Stacking Up the New ARRA Grants

  6. A Comprehensive Approach

  7. Investing in Innovation $650 Million Status:             The notice for public comment will be published this fall, applications will be available early next year. Title I School Improvement Grants $3.5 Billion • Status: The public comment phase for the School Improvement Grants closed on September 25th and those applications will be available this winter and due 30 days later . Teacher Incentive Fund $200 Million • Status: The notice of proposed priorities will be published for comments this fall.  The notice inviting applications will be published this winter and applications will be due 60 days after the notice publishes. Teacher Quality Partnership Program $100 Million Status: Notice Inviting Application has been published and applications are due October 6, 2009

  8. State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Phase Two$11.5 Billion Status: The public comment phase for the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Phase Two closed on August 28th – applications will be published this fall and due approximately 30 days later. Race to the Top $4.35 Billion Status: The public comment phase for Race to the Top closed on August 28th and ED received over 1100 comments.  The Final Notice and application package are expected to be published late this fall and applications will be due 2 months later. 

  9. Action Steps to Ensure Strategic Planning and Implementation of all ARRA Grants • Governor’s Office & SEA Engage LEAs in Development of Overall State Education Reform Plan • Governor’s Office & SEA gather input from LEAs on their strengths and weakness in terms of the four reform priorities. Then together with LEAs, business leaders, parents, teachers, and community partners, SEA maps out overall plans that incorporate these reform priorities into a state-level framework for its ARRA applications and implementation of ARRA funds. October November Dec . – Feb. LEAs Implement Title I and IDEA ARRA plans LEA planning and applying to SEA for Education Technology (Ed Tech) grants Partnerships submit TQP applications to ED (due 10/6) SEA applies for SFSF Phase Two grant (due early Nov) SEA applies to ED for SLDS grant (due Nov. 19th) SEA/Gov work on RTTapplication (due mid-winter) SEA works on SIG & i3 applications (due mid-winter) • Action Steps: • State and local Title I and IDEA directors review ED Use of Funds Guidance for both programsand identify possible ways to complement each others’ spending plans around one or more of the ARRA reform areas. • SEA briefs state and local Title I and IDEA directors on status of other ARRA funding sources and status of upcoming applications. • SEA and state Title I and IDEA directors work with local Title I and IDEA directors to identify specific ways to contribute to the applications for new ARRA grants (i.e. supply data, ARRA spending plans and recommendations). This effort will improve the quality of ARRA applications for new grants and maximize the opportunities for cohesive and sustainable reform efforts. • Action Steps: • State and local Title I and IDEA directors, LEA data managers, and state SLDS project directors meet to identify opportunities to use district data models at state level. • TQP applicants brief local Title I and IDEA directors on submissions – identify links to other ARRA grants. • Governor’s office and SEA briefs all LEAs on its SFSF Phase Two application which is the baseline for other ARRA grants. • ED Tech applicants (LEAs) meet with local Title I and IDEA directors, and other education officials, to identify possible uses of Ed Tech funding to complement overall district reform planning. • Action Steps: • Governors, SEAs and LEAs meet to review RTT and SIG applications together to outline an approach that builds on other ARRA funding. • SLDS project directors, Ed Tech applicants, and state and local Title I and IDEA directors are briefed on RTT SIG and i3 applications – discuss connections and opportunities. • Governors and SEAs meet with counterparts from other states to exchange reform ideas, best practices, and opportunities to form consortia. • Governors and SEAs review Title I & IDEA use of ARRA funds and applications for TQP, SFSF Phase Two, SLDS, Ed Tech, and SIG to build upon for RTT and i3 applications.

  10. Who Applies State District State Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems $250 million 95% of ARRA Grants Explicitly Require SEA – LEA Coordination 95% Explicitly Requires SEA – LEA Coordination Teacher Incentive Fund Both Race to the Top WhoSpends $200 million $4.35 billion School Improvement Grants SFSFPhase Two Investing in Innovation District Teacher Quality Part. $650 million $3.5 billion EdTech $100 million $11.5 billion $650 million

  11. K-12 Reform PrioritiesAmerican Recovery & Reinvestment Act K - 12 Standards & Assessments Effective Teachers and Leaders State Fiscal Stabilization Fund $48.6 billion Race to the Top & Other New Grants ~$9.7 billion Turning Around Struggling Schools Data Systems Title I, IDEA & Other Existing Formula Grants ~$26 billion

  12. ARRA Strategic Planning Goals • Opportunities: • Create Lasting Reforms • Break Down Silos between SEAs and LEAs • Break Down Silos between Title I & IDEA directors , budget managers and other program directors • Establish models of Community Engagement & Transparency • Improve Capacity for Grant Management in SEAs and LEAs • Core Actions: • Develop overarching vision for school reform at the state and local levels • Convene state and local education officials and leaders throughout the grant planning, applying and implementation process to share information and collaborate on each ARRA grant • Examine Use of Funds Guidance from ED for each grant • Exchange best practices and create common reform models • Make use of the reports, studies, analysis, and ED materials and education associations • Collaborate with ED’s Comprehensive Centers, Equity Centers, Technical Assistance Network Centers, and Regional Education Laboratories and National Research and Development Centers

  13. Identify Reform Needs & Funding Sources State Level Planning Race to the Top & Other New Grants ~$9.7 billion State Fiscal Stabilization Fund II $11.5 billion District Level Planning Persistently Low-Performing Schools Classroom Reforms Title I, IDEA & Other Existing Formula Grants ~$26 billion

  14. K-12 – Higher ED Linkages

  15. National Education Data Model (NEDM) • A comprehensive, local education, conceptual data model that provides a common structure with which schools can: • Evaluate and improve software tools • Enhance the movement of student information from one Local Educational Agency (LEA) to another and to the State Education Agency (SEA) • Inform instruction and enhance data quality 16 <footer>

  16. Initial NEDM Framework SEA Board SEA IEU LEA Board Finance Facilities LEA LEA Staff Food Service Accountability School Transportation Staff Qualifications Instructional Programs/ Curriculum Course/ Class Staff Professional Development Programs Safety & Discipline Student Activities Health Attendance Assessment 17

  17. NEDM: the Next Phase – Federal Reports and Higher Education • This phase has included the addition of federal report information (EDFacts, CCD, etc), linkages to Handbook information and transcript information between pK-12 and Higher Education. • Official rollout fall 2009 • Working site: http://nedm.sifassociation.org/datamodel_review/Index.aspx 18 <footer>

  18. Concluding Remarks • Efforts to better align data initiatives underway at USED • EDFacts • SLDS • Common Data Standards • National Education Data Model • SFSF metrics seek to leverage and accelerate work of longitudinal data systems • Connections between teacher and student records • Alignment of K-12 and higher education data <footer>

More Related