1 / 10

Service Measurement & Improvement – MTAC Workgroup #94 MTAC Meeting, February 22, 2006

Service Measurement & Improvement – MTAC Workgroup #94 MTAC Meeting, February 22, 2006. MTAC Areas of Focus. Address Accuracy Seamless Acceptance & Induction Optimizing Preparation & Entry Service Measurement & Improvement. Service Measurement & Improvement. USPS Sponsors:

meghan
Télécharger la présentation

Service Measurement & Improvement – MTAC Workgroup #94 MTAC Meeting, February 22, 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Service Measurement & Improvement– MTAC Workgroup #94MTAC Meeting, February 22, 2006

  2. MTAC Areas of Focus • Address Accuracy • Seamless Acceptance & Induction • Optimizing Preparation & Entry • Service Measurement & Improvement

  3. Service Measurement & Improvement • USPS Sponsors: • Paul Vogel, V.P., Network Operations Mgmt • Nick Barranca, V.P., Product Development • Industry Sponsors: • Jim Bowler, Parcel Shippers Association • Joyce Bagby, Association of Priority Mail Users

  4. Service Measurement & Improvement • Workgroup: • Service Performance Reporting Process Standardization • Workgroup Leaders: • Bob Fisher, Manager, Service Improvement Performance (USPS) • Mury Salls, VP Postal Relations, DST Output

  5. Service Performance Reporting Process Standardization • 2-day Meeting – August 2 and 3, 2005 • Over 30 attendees representing various industry segments • Presentation from industry representatives addressing 4 basic questions:

  6. Service Performance Reporting Process Standardization • 1. What data do you have that measures service performance? • - Segmentation of data made at the district or 3-digit • - Source of data (seeds, Confirm, customers) • - Frequency of data collection

  7. Service Performance Reporting Process Standardization • 2. How valid/representative is your service measurement process? • - Statistical validity • - Seeding vs. regular mailings • - Frequency • - Determination of start and stop the clock

  8. Service Performance Reporting Process Standardization • 3. How do you share your service results with the USPS? What has your experience been in sharing these results? • 4. What issues or concerns do you have relative to service reporting effectiveness?

  9. Service Performance Reporting Process Standardization • No consistency source for tracking data • No consistency in reporting data • Mailers are frustrated at the lack of a USPS measurement system for all classes of mail • Mailers are frustrated when USPS doesn’t “trust” the data provided • Confirm Certification is an issue (start the clock and EMD/uniqueness issues)

  10. Service Performance Reporting Process Standardization • Progress? • Meeting Scheduled at Postal Headquarters March 2, 2006 • Attendees From Industry and USPS, 10 - 12 People • Next Steps? • Finalize Report to USPS/Industry Sponsors June, 2006

More Related