1 / 45

Navigating the SHPD Review Process

This document provides an overview of the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) review process in Hawaii, including why it is important, who the SHPD is, how they conduct reviews, and what you can do as a stakeholder. It also includes contact information for SHPD.

melindap
Télécharger la présentation

Navigating the SHPD Review Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Navigating the SHPD Review Process Department of Accounting and General Services July 2019

  2. Overview • Why we do what we do (How come we gotta do dis?) • Who we are (What school you went?) • How we do (How you went do dat?) • When we do (Who tole you fo do `em?) • What YOU can do (If can, can; no can, no can) SHPD Contact Information (Call us bumbye)

  3. Why we do what we do Hawaii has unique historic resources that showcase our island values, lifestyle, and culture. Many of these resources are now considered historic and preserving this part of Hawaii’s history requires the commitment and collaboration with many partners. Central to this effort is the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD).

  4. Why we do what we do Hawai‘i Revised Statutes: The Constitution of the State of Hawaii recognizes the value of conserving and developing the historic and cultural property within the State for the public good. The legislature declares that the historic and cultural heritage of the State is among its important assets and that the rapid social and economic developments of contemporary society threaten to destroy the remaining vestiges of this heritage. National Historic Preservation Act: The Congress finds and declares that the spirit and direction of the Nation are founded upon and reflected in its historic heritage; the historical and cultural foundations of the Nation should be preserved as a living part of our community life and development in order to give a sense of orientation to the American People.

  5. Who we are Administrator (Deputy SHPO)

  6. Who we are Archaeology Review and Compliance SIHP IBCs Archaeological Field Inspections Site Visits Community Outreach Professional Presentations Architecture • Review and Compliance • Burial Sites • Human Skeletal Remains • Island Burial Councils • Research • Genealogy • NHO Outreach • NAGPRA Repatriation Consultation • Ethnographic Surveys Review and Compliance State & National Register Program Federal Tax Credit Program Certified Local Government Program Survey and Inventory HRS Chapter 6E Review NHPA Section 106 Review Outreach and Education History & Culture

  7. How we do Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law Hawaii Revised Statutes Hawaii Administrative Rules HRS Chapter 6E-8 HAR Chapter 13-275 HRS Chapter 6E-10 * HRS Chapter 6E-42 HAR Chapter 13-284 HRS Chapter 6E-43 HAR Chapter 13-300 STATE National Historic Preservation Act Code of Federal Regulations NHPA Section 106 36 CFR 800 FEDERAL

  8. How we do 6E Review and Compliance Governing Procedure Law Hawaii Revised Statutes Hawaii Administrative Rules HRS Chapter 6E-8 HAR Chapter 13-275 STATE Review of effect of proposed state and county projects. Before any agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions commences any project which may affect historic property, aviation artifact, or a burial site, the agency or officer shall advise the department and allow the department an opportunity for review of the effect of the proposed project on historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites, consistent with section 6E-43, especially those listed on the Hawaii register of historic places. The proposed project shall not be commenced, or, in the event it has already begun, continued, until the department shall have given its written concurrence. …The department is to provide written concurrence or non-concurrence within ninety days after the filing of a request with the department.

  9. How we do 6E Review and Compliance Governing Procedure Law Hawaii Revised Statutes Hawaii Administrative Rules HRS Chapter 6E-8 HAR Chapter 13-275 STATE HAR§13-275-5Identification and inventory of historic properties. (b) …The SHPD shall supply a response in writing within thirty daysof the receipt of the initiating request at the SHPD office. … The SHPD shall inform the agency within forty five daysof SHPD receipt of the report or archaeological assessment if the information contained in the report or archaeological assessment is adequate or inadequate. HAR§13-275-6Evaluation of Significance. (d) Significance assessments shall be submitted to the SHPD for review…The SHPD shall agree or disagree with the significance of evaluations within forty five daysof receipt of the significance evaluations.

  10. How we do 6E Review and Compliance Governing Procedure Law Hawaii Revised Statutes Hawaii Administrative Rules HRS Chapter 6E-8 HAR Chapter 13-275 STATE HAR§13-275-7Determining effects to significant historic properties. (a)(1) “No historic properties affected”. The project will have no effect on significant historic properties. (a)(2) “Effect, with proposed mitigation commitments”. The project will affect one or more significant historic properties, and the effects will be potentially harmful. However, the agency has proposed mitigation commitments involving one or more forms of mitigation to reasonably and acceptably mitigate the harmful effects. OR

  11. How we do 6E Review and Compliance Governing Procedure Law Hawaii Revised Statutes Hawaii Administrative Rules HRS Chapter 6E-8 HAR Chapter 13-275 STATE HAR§13-275-7Determining effects to significant historic properties. (c)(1) If the SHPD disagrees with the effect determinations, a letter that specifies the disagreements shall be sent within forty five daysof SHPD receipt of the effect determinations. (c)(2) If the SHPD agrees with the effect determinations, the SHPD shall send a letter of agreement within forty five daysof SHPD receipt of the effect determinations. HAR§13-275-8Mitigation. (b) If the proposal is not acceptable, SHPD shall send a letter outlining needed changes or a determination letter not concurring with the project, within forty five daysof SHPD receipt of the mitigation commitments. (c) If the commitments are acceptable, the SHPD shall send a determination letter concurring with the proposed project within forty five daysof receipt of the mitigation commitments.

  12. How we do 6E Review and Compliance Governing Procedure Law Hawaii Revised Statutes Hawaii Administrative Rules HRS Chapter 6E-8 HAR Chapter 13-275 STATE HAR§13-275-9Verification of completion of the detailed mitigation plan. (c) If the SHPD agrees that the work has been successfully concluded, SHPD shall send a verification letter within forty five daysand the historic preservation process is concluded. (d) In cases involving preservation, archaeological data recovery, or architectural recordation, the agency has the option to request an accelerated, two step verification, understanding that construction projects often need to proceed rapidly and that a completion report is often finished months after fieldwork is completed.

  13. How we do 6E Review and Compliance Governing Procedure Law Hawaii Revised Statutes Hawaii Administrative Rules HRS Chapter 6E-8 HAR Chapter 13-275 STATE HAR§13-275-9Verification of completion of the detailed mitigation plan. (d)(1) Step 1. The SHPD writes a letter within thirty daysto the agency agreeing and stating construction may proceed, with the understanding that Step 2 must be completed to conclude the historic preservation process. (d)(2) Step 2. The agency shall submit documentation to the SHPD a completion report for the data recovery work, architectural recordation, or final preservation work. The SHPD shall write a letter to the agency within thirty daysstating the completion report is adequate and that the historic preservation process is concluded. (e) In cases involving solely historic data recovery or ethnographic documentation where no field study of the historic properties is to occur…If the SHPD agrees, it shall send a letter to the agency within thirty daysto the agency stating construction may proceed, with the agreement that the report shall be submitted to the SHPD by the agreed upon date and shall then be reviewed in accordance with subsections 13-284-9(a-c)…If the SHPD does not agree with the request, the SHPD shall write a letter within thirty daysto the person indicating the SHPD’s concerns.

  14. How we do Governing Procedure Hawaii Administrative Rules HAR Chapter 13-275 6E Review and Compliance Request 30 days NHPA or Need Info (AIS, RLS, ILS) §13-275-5 45 days Adequate/Inadequate §13-275-5 STEP 1: Identification 45 days Agree/Disagree §13-275-6 STEP 2: Evaluation “No historic properties affected “Effect, with proposed mitigation commitments” 45 days Disagree/Agree STEP 3: Determining Effects §13-275-7 45 days Not Acceptable/Acceptable §13-275-8 STEP 4: Mitigation Commitments 45 days Not Acceptable/Acceptable §13-275-9 Verification Documents for review steps one through four SHALL be submitted concurrently (HAR §13-275-3)

  15. How we do 6E Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law Hawaii Revised Statutes Hawaii Administrative Rules HRS Chapter 6E-10 * STATE Privately owned historic property. Before any construction, alteration, disposition or improvement of any nature, by, for, or permitted by a private landowner may be commenced which will affect an historic property on the Hawaii register of historic places, the landowner shall notify the department of the construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any nature and allow the department opportunity for review of the effect of the proposed construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any nature on the historic property. The proposed construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any nature shall not be commenced, or in the event it has already begun, continue, until the department shall have given its concurrence or ninety dayshave elapsed.

  16. How we do 6E Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law Hawaii Revised Statutes Hawaii Administrative Rules HRS Chapter 6E-10 * STATE Within ninety days after notification, the department shall: (1) Commence condemnation proceedings for the purchase of the historic property if the department and property owner do not agree upon an appropriate course of action; (2) Permit the owner to proceed with the owner's construction, alteration, or improvement; or (3) In coordination with the owner, undertake or permit the investigation, recording, preservation, and salvage of any historical information deemed necessary to preserve Hawaiian history, by any qualified agency for this purpose.

  17. How we do 6E Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law Hawaii Revised Statutes Hawaii Administrative Rules HRS Chapter 6E-42 HAR Chapter 13-284 STATE Review of proposed projects. Before any agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions approves any project involving a permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement for use, which may affect historic property, aviation artifacts, or a burial site, the agency or office shall advise the department and prior to any approval allow the department an opportunity for review and comment on the effect of the proposed project on historic properties, aviation artifacts, or burial sites, consistent with section 6E-43, including those listed in the Hawaii register of historic places.

  18. How we do 6E Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law Hawaii Revised Statutes Hawaii Administrative Rules HRS Chapter 6E-42 HAR Chapter 13-284 STATE HAR§13-284-5Identification and inventory of historic properties. (b) …The SHPD shall supply a response in writing within thirty daysof the receipt of the initiating request at the SHPD office. (e) …When consultation is required, as specified in any of the reporting rules or guidelines for surveys, the report shall include a summary of the consultation process. The SHPD shall inform the agency within forty five daysof SHPD receipt of the report, if the information contained in the report or archaeological assessment is adequate or inadequate. HAR§13-284-6Evaluation of Significance. (d) Significance assessments shall be submitted to the SHPD for review. The SHPD shall agree or disagree with the significance of evaluations within forty five daysof receipt of the significance evaluations.

  19. How we do 6E Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law Hawaii Revised Statutes Hawaii Administrative Rules HRS Chapter 6E-42 HAR Chapter 13-284 STATE HAR§13-284-7Determining effects to significant historic properties. (a)(1) “No historic properties affected”. The project will have no effect on significant historic properties: or (a)(2) “Effect, with agreed upon mitigation commitments”. The project will affect one or more significant historic properties, and the effects will potentially be harmful. However, the person has agreed to mitigation commitments involving one or more forms of mitigation to reasonably and acceptably mitigate the harmful effects. OR

  20. How we do 6E Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law Hawaii Revised Statutes Hawaii Administrative Rules HRS Chapter 6E-42 HAR Chapter 13-284 STATE HAR§13-284-7Determining effects to significant historic properties. (c)(2) If the SHPD agrees with the effect determinations, the SHPD shall send a letter of agreement within forty five daysof SHPD receipt of the effect determinations. HAR§13-284-8Mitigation. (b) If the proposal is not adequate, SHPD shall send a letter outlining needed changes, within forty five daysof receipt of the mitigation commitments. (c) If the commitments are acceptable, the SHPD shall send a letter concurring with the proposed project within forty five daysof receipt of the mitigation commitments.

  21. How we do 6E Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law Hawaii Revised Statutes Hawaii Administrative Rules HRS Chapter 6E-42 HAR Chapter 13-284 STATE HAR§13-284-9Verification of completion of the detailed mitigation plan. (c) If the SHPD agrees that the work has been successfully concluded, SHPD shall send a verification letter within thirty daysand the historic preservation process is concluded. (d) (1) If the measures have not been successfully completed, the SHPD shall write a letter within thirty daysto the agency indicating what needs to be completed. (d) (2) The agency shall submit to the SHPD a completion report for the data recovery work, architectural recordation, or final preservation work. The SHPD shall write a letter to the agency within thirty daysstating the completion report is adequate and that the historic preservation process is concluded.

  22. How we do 6E Review and Compliance Hawaii Revised Statute HRS 6E-8 Hawaii Revised Statute HRS 6E-42 Governing Procedure Governing Procedure Hawaii Administrative Rules HAR Chapter 13-275 Hawaii Administrative Rules HAR Chapter 13-284 1) “No historic properties affected” 2) “Effect, with agreed upon mitigation commitments “No historic properties affected” “Effect, with proposed mitigation commitments”

  23. How we do Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law Hawaii Revised Statutes Hawaii Administrative Rules HRS Chapter 6E-8 HAR Chapter 13-275 HRS Chapter 6E-42 HAR Chapter 13-284 STATE HAR§13-275-3Obtaining a determination letter; generally. If the SHPD fails to send written comments within the set time, or by a mutually agreed upon date, then the SHPD is presumed to concur with the agency’s submittal. HAR§13-284-3Conducting a historic preservation review; generally. (e) If the SHPD fails to send written comments within the set time, or by a mutually agreed upon date, then the SHPD is presumed to concur with the agency’s submittal.

  24. How we do Review and Compliance HRS Chapter 6E 42.2 (Act 224) An existing privately owned single-family dwelling unit or townhouse shall be subject to the requirements of Section 6E-42 only if the single-family detached dwelling unit or townhouse is over fifty years old and: Is listed on the Hawaii or National register of historic places, or both; Is nominated for inclusion on the Hawaii or national register of historic places, or both; or Is located in a historic district. STATE

  25. let’s take a break

  26. How we do 106 Review and Compliance SECTION106

  27. How we do 106 Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law National Historic Preservation Act Code of Federal Regulations NHPA Section 106 36 CFR 800 FEDERAL Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires Federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties and afford the Council a reasonable opportunity to comment on such undertakings. The section 106 process seeks to accommodate historic preservation concerns with the needs of Federal undertakings through consultation among the agency official and other parties with an interest in the effects of the undertaking on historic properties, commencing at the early stages of project planning. The goal of consultation is to identify historic properties potentially affected by the undertaking, assess its effects and seek ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse effects on historic properties.

  28. How we do 106 Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law National Historic Preservation Act Code of Federal Regulations NHPA Section 106 36 CFR 800 FEDERAL §800.3 Initiation of the section 106 process. Establish undertaking. The agency official shall determine whether the proposed Federal action is an undertaking as defined in § 800.16(y) and, if so, whether it is a type of activity that has the potential to cause effects on historic properties. Undertaking means a project, activity, or program funded in whole or in part under the direct or indirect jurisdiction of a Federal agency, including those carried out by or on behalf of a Federal agency; those carried out with Federal financial assistance; and those requiring a Federal permit, license or approval. Is the Project Federally funded? Is the Project located on Federally owned land? Will the Project require a Federal permit and or approval?

  29. How we do 106 Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law National Historic Preservation Act Code of Federal Regulations NHPA Section 106 36 CFR 800 FEDERAL §800.4 Identification of historic properties. Determine scope of identification efforts. In consultation with the SHPO, the agency official shall: Determine and document the area of potential effects Review existing information on historic properties within the area of potential effects, including any data concerning possible historic properties not yet identified; (3) Seek information, as appropriate, from consulting parties, and other individuals and organizations likely to have knowledge of, or concerns with, historic properties in the area, and identify issues relating to the undertaking's potential effects on historic properties; and (4) Gather information from any Native Hawaiian organization

  30. How we do 106 Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law National Historic Preservation Act Code of Federal Regulations NHPA Section 106 36 CFR 800 FEDERAL §800.4 Identification of historic properties. (b) Identify historic properties. Based on the information gathered under paragraph (a) of this section, and in consultation with the SHPO and Native Hawaiian organization that might attach religious and cultural significance to properties within the area of potential effects, the agency official shall take the steps necessary to identify historic properties within the area of potential effects. (c) Evaluate historic significance. Apply National Register criteria. “the agency official shall apply the National Register criteria to properties identified within the area of potential effects that have not been previously evaluated for National Register eligibility” Determine whether a property is eligible. If the agency official determines any of the National Register criteria are met and the SHPO agrees, the property shall be considered eligible for the National Register for section 106 purposes.

  31. How we do 106 Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law National Historic Preservation Act Code of Federal Regulations NHPA Section 106 36 CFR 800 FEDERAL §800.4 Identification of historic properties. (d) Results of identification and evaluation. (1) No historic properties affected. If the agency official finds that either there are no historic properties present or there are historic properties present but the undertaking will have no effect upon them If the SHPO or the Council if it has entered the section 106 process, does not object within 30 days of receipt of an adequately documented finding, the agency official's responsibilities under section 106 are fulfilled. (2) Historic properties affected. If the agency official finds that there are historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking, the agency official shall notify all consulting parties, including Native Hawaiian organizations, invite their views on the effects and assess adverse effects, if any, in accordance with §800.5.

  32. How we do 106 Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law National Historic Preservation Act Code of Federal Regulations NHPA Section 106 36 CFR 800 FEDERAL § 800.5 Assessment of adverse effects. Apply criteria of adverse effect. In consultation with the SHPO and any Native Hawaiian organization that attaches religious and cultural significance to identified historic properties, the agency official shall apply the criteria of adverse effect to historic properties within the area of potential effects Criteria of adverse effect. An adverse effect is found when an undertaking may alter, directly or indirectly, any of the characteristics of a historic property that qualify the property for inclusion in the National Register in a manner that would diminish the integrity of the property's location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, or association.

  33. How we do 106 Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law National Historic Preservation Act Code of Federal Regulations NHPA Section 106 36 CFR 800 FEDERAL § 800.5 Assessment of adverse effects. (a)(1) Examples of adverse effects. Physical destruction of or damage to all or part of the property; Alteration of a property, including restoration, rehabilitation, repair, maintenance, stabilization, hazardous material remediation and provision of handicapped access, that is not consistent with the Secretary’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (36 CFR part 68) and applicable guidelines; Removal of the property from its historic location; Change of the character of the property’s use or of physical features within the property's setting that contribute to its historic significance;

  34. How we do 106 Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law National Historic Preservation Act Code of Federal Regulations NHPA Section 106 36 CFR 800 FEDERAL § 800.5 Assessment of adverse effects. (a)(1) Examples of adverse effects. Introduction of visual, atmospheric or audible elements that diminish the integrity of the property's significant historic features; Neglect of a property which causes its deterioration, except where such neglect and deterioration are recognized qualities of a property of religious and cultural significance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization; and (vii) Transfer, lease, or sale of property out of Federal ownership or control without adequate and legally enforceable restrictions or conditions to ensure long-term preservation of the property's historic significance.

  35. How we do 106 Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law National Historic Preservation Act Code of Federal Regulations NHPA Section 106 36 CFR 800 FEDERAL § 800.5 Assessment of adverse effects. Finding of no adverse effect. The agency official, in consultation with the SHPO, may propose a finding of no adverse effect when the undertaking's effects do not meet the criteria of paragraph (a)(1) of this section or the undertaking is modified or conditions are imposed, such as the subsequent review of plans for rehabilitation by the SHPO/THPO to ensure consistency with the Secretary’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (36 CFR part 68) and applicable guidelines, to avoid adverse effects. (d) Results of assessment. (1) No adverse effect. The agency official shall maintain a record of the finding and provide information on the finding to the public on request, consistent with the confidentiality provisions of § 800.11(c). (2) Adverse effect. If an adverse effect is found, the agency official shall consult further to resolve the adverse effect pursuant to § 800.6.

  36. How we do 106 Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law National Historic Preservation Act Code of Federal Regulations NHPA Section 106 36 CFR 800 FEDERAL §800.6 Resolution of adverse effects. (a) Continue consultation. Resolve adverse effects. (1) Resolution without the Council. (iv) If the agency official and the SHPO/THPO agree on how the adverse effects will be resolved, they shall execute a memorandum of agreement. (2) Resolution with Council. (c) Memorandum of agreement. A memorandum of agreement executed and implemented pursuant to this section evidences the agency official's compliance with section 106 and this part and shall govern the undertaking and all of its parts. The agency official shall ensure that the undertaking is carried out in accordance with the memorandum of agreement.

  37. How we do 106 Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law National Historic Preservation Act Code of Federal Regulations NHPA Section 106 36 CFR 800 FEDERAL § 800.11 Documentation standards. (d) Finding of no historic properties affected. Documentation shall include: (1) A description of the undertaking, specifying the Federal involvement, and its area of potential effects, including photographs, maps, drawings, as necessary; (2) A description of the steps taken to identify historic properties, including, as appropriate, efforts to seek information pursuant to § 800.4(b); and (3) The basis for determining that no historic properties are present or affected. §800.4 I.D. of historic properties. (d)(1) No historic properties affected

  38. How we do 106 Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law National Historic Preservation Act Code of Federal Regulations NHPA Section 106 36 CFR 800 FEDERAL § 800.11 Documentation standards. (e) Finding of no adverse effect or adverse effect. Documentation shall include: (1) A description of the undertaking, specifying the Federal involvement, and its area of potential effects, including photographs, maps, and drawings, as necessary; (2) A description of the steps taken to identify historic properties; (3) A description of the affected historic properties, including information on the characteristics that qualify them for the National Register; (4) A description of the undertaking's effects on historic properties; (5) An explanation of why the criteria of adverse effect were found applicable or inapplicable, including any conditions or future actions to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects; and (6) Copies or summaries of any views provided by consulting parties and the public. §800.5 Assessment of Adverse Effects.

  39. let’s take another break

  40. When we do Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law Chapter 6E, HRS13-275, 284, 300, HAR STATE Before any agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions commences any project which may affect historic property, aviation artifact, or a burial site, the agency or officer shall advise the department and allow the department an opportunity for review of the effect of the proposed project on historic properties… Before any construction, alteration, disposition or improvement of any nature, by, for, or permitted by a private landowner may be commenced which will affect an historic property on the Hawaii register of historic places, the landowner shall notify the department of the construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any nature and allow the department opportunity for review of the effect of the proposed construction, alteration, disposition, or improvement of any nature on the historic property. Before any agency or officer of the State or its political subdivisions approves any project involving a permit, license, certificate, land use change, subdivision, or other entitlement for use, which may affect historic property, aviation artifacts, or a burial site, the agency or office shall advise the department and prior to any approval allow the department an opportunity for review and comment on the effect of the proposed project on historic properties…

  41. When we do Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law Section 106, NHPA 36 CFR 800 FEDERAL Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires Federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties and afford the Council a reasonable opportunity to comment on such undertakings.

  42. When we do Review and Compliance Governing Procedures Law Section 106, NHPA 36 CFR 800 FEDERAL Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires Federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties and afford the Council a reasonable opportunity to comment on such undertakings.

  43. What YOU can do Review and Compliance Familiarize Yourself Federal & State Law You need not be an expert but aware of SHPD processes. At minimum, know if the resource is 50 years or older, which State review, and if the Project is subject to Section 106, NHPA. Follow the steps and know where you are in the process. Recommendation Provide Information Project Data and Submittals Recommendation Provide us with as much relevant information as possible. At minimum: Applicant Contact Information Project Address and TMK Detailed description of any previous ground disturbance (if any) SHPD Log and Doc Numbers (if applicable) Detailed description of proposed work and ground disturbance (if any) The permit set of drawings Color photos/images: 1-2 street views of resource and surrounding area, 1-2 overview of exterior work area, 1 each of exterior elevations of structure (if applicable), and 1-2 interior photos of each affected area of work (if applicable)

  44. What YOU can do Consult with us SHPD Contacts Alan Downer, Administrator: P: 692-8015 E: Alan.S.Downer@hawaii.govHinano Rodrigues, History and Culture Branch ChiefP: 243-4640 E: Hinano.R.Rodrigues@hawaii.govSusan Lebo, Archaeology Branch ChiefP: 692-8019 E: Susan.A.Lebo@hawaii.gov Stephanie Hacker, Oahu Archaeologist P: 692-8046 E: Stephanie.Hacker@hawaii.govTanya Gumapac-McGuire, Acting Architecture Branch Chief P: 692-8022 E: Tanya.Gumapac-McGuire@hawaii.gov Points of Contact

  45. Mahalo Hawaii has unique historic resources that showcase our island values, lifestyle, and culture. Many of these resources are now considered historic and preserving this part of Hawaii’s history requires the commitment and collaboration with many partners. Central to this effort is ALL OF US. Electronic copy of these slides and other handouts available at: http://pwd.hawaii.gov/shpd

More Related