1 / 23

Conductance of a spin-1 QD: two-stage Kondo effect

Conductance of a spin-1 QD: two-stage Kondo effect. Anna Posazhennikova Institut für Theoretische Festkörperphysik, Uni Karlsruhe, Germany. Collaborators: Babak Bayani (TFP, University Karlsruhe, Germany) Piers Coleman (Rutgers University, NJ, USA).

miller
Télécharger la présentation

Conductance of a spin-1 QD: two-stage Kondo effect

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Conductanceof a spin-1 QD:two-stage Kondo effect Anna Posazhennikova Institut für Theoretische Festkörperphysik, Uni Karlsruhe, Germany Collaborators: Babak Bayani (TFP, University Karlsruhe, Germany) Piers Coleman (Rutgers University, NJ, USA) Les Houches, June 19, 2006

  2. Outline • Introduction: Kondo effect in bulk and mesoscopic systems • Spin-1 QD: theoretical expectations • Model and T-matrix analysis • Conductance calculations • Conclusions and outlook

  3. Introduction: Kondo Effect

  4. History of Kondo effect System: metallic host + magnetic impurity • 1930 – ρmin in some alloys • 1950 – Χcurie –measurements showed that a LM forms in those alloys, which exhibit ρmin Q1: why does LM form? • 1961 - P. W. Anderson: U is large enough compared to interlevel spacing Atomic limit of Anderson model Possible states

  5. History of Kondo effect Q2: why does the formation of LM lead to ρmin ? • 1964 – Jun Kondo, Hamiltonian • Perturbation theory breaks down at TK • TK is the only scale in the problem • Q3: why does ρ saturates at low temperatures? • 1970 – conjecture of Anderson and Yuval – • GS is a paramagnetic spin singlet confirmed by • 1971 - K.Wilson – NRG • Up to here: orbital momentum

  6. History of Kondo effect Q4: what happens in more realistic situation with • 1980 Blandin, Nozieres • 1984 Andrei, Tsvelik, Wiegman Perfectly Screened KE Underscreened KE Overscreened KE FL NFL NFL USK, OSK – inaccessible in bulk materials Mesoscopics?

  7. Introduction: Kondo Effect in Quantum Dots

  8. Introduction: Kondo Effect in QD

  9. Realization of spin-1 QD: singlet-triplet transition in zero magnetic field Neven Nodd

  10. Spin-1 QD: two-channel Kondo effect Set up: spin, coupled to left (L) and right (R) leads L R Kondo Hamiltonian diagonalization J1, J2 – two coupling constants => two screening channels

  11. Conductance of a spin-1 QD: one-channel => two channel crossover Pustilnik, Glazman, PRL’01

  12. Reminder: Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation Kondo Model Anderson Model Schrieffer-Wolff transformation 2 channel Anderson H-an (infinite U)

  13. Auxiliary particle representation of the Anderson Hamiltonian Introduce auxiliary particles Schwinger bosons auxiliary fermions (holons) + constraint

  14. Novel large-N approximation

  15. T-matrix for one channel for different temperatures and at finite voltage

  16. Conductance of a spin-1 QD: expectations (reminder) One-channel Two-channel Log correction due to USK!

  17. Current through the dot Follow method proposed by Meir, Wingreen, PRL 1992 -Keldysh Green‘s functions

  18. Current throught the dot Single-channel contributions + interference term Goal:calculation of the dot‘s Green‘s functions D

  19. One-channel current Note: the dot GF is proportional to the t-matrix of conduction electrons

  20. Results: conductance – one channel Linear conductance Voltage-dependence of conductance

  21. Results: conductance two-channel QD Everything is messed up by the interchannel GFs => the current is not expressed In terms of t-matrices of single channels Simplifications: linear conductance – elastic scattering => results TK2/TK1 3 1 – 10 2 – 100 3 – 1000 2 1

  22. Comparison with NRG Hofstetter, Schoeller, PRL 2002 NRG gives qualitatively same results

  23. Conclusions and future work • We calculated analytically transport in a spin-1 QD in case of one and two-channels • In case of one –channel singular conductance is obtained – signature of US Kondo effect • In case of two-channels interference effects are observed – conductance is suppressed at low T • Future projects • Improve the results for two-channel conductance, taking into account • the inelastic scattering terms • Inclusion of magnetic field • Inclusion of spin – relaxation effects

More Related