The Maritime Strategy, Fleet Response Plan & Maintenance Contributions

1. The Maritime Strategy,Fleet Response Plan &Maintenance Contributions RDML Joe Campbell, OPNAV N43BDeputy Director, Fleet Readiness Division

2. Maritime Strategy & Seapower

3. Maritime Strategy • Vision that coalesces recent strategic initiatives • Recognizes the reality of a global economy • Almost all international commerce uses some form of water transportation • Prosperity flourishes in times of peace • Global economy is vulnerable to natural disasters and human disruptions • All nations that receive benefit from maritime commerce have a stake in deterring conflicts

4. Initiatives Covered in Maritime Strategy • Forward Presence • Strategic Deterrence • Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA) • 1,000 ship Navy • Develop partnerships and coalitions • Expand MDA beyond US only capabilities • Global Fleet Stations • Create partners in developing areas • Create stability through increased enforcement capability • Foreign Diplomacy / Strategic Shaping • Humanitarian outreach: create friends / prevent enemies

5. Implementing Maritime Strategy • Need assets capable of implementing strategy • 30-year shipbuilding plan • Assets need to be kept relevant • Modernization plans • Need to balance platform use with life-cycle maintenance requirements • Fleet Response Plan construct • Total Life-Cycle costs of equipment • Being able to fully utilize what we have

6. What Does FRP Construct Do? • The Fleet Response Plan (FRP) construct optimizes Navy ability to provide forces to support the Maritime Strategy • FRP expands the availability of forces ready for tasking during their operational cycle • FRP maximizes return on investment in readiness accounts • FRP enhances Navy rotational commitment strategy by enabling a more flexible force provider decision to fulfill emergent missions. • FRP can be applied to any unit that develops readiness through a time-phased training program • Training requirements, operational capabilities and amount of maintenance accomplished are unchanged by FRP

7. FRP Codified • FRP cycle defined . . . “The Ready Fleet” • Basic / Integrated / Sustainment (includes Deployed) / Maintenance • Capitalize on capacity to increase availability • Create flexible deployment options • Make available Maritime Security and Homeland Defense forces • FRP phases tied to mission…Maritime Security, GWOT and MCO • Thresholds of readiness • Standardizes terms and definitions • Based on Class Maintenance Plans and cycle length • Application beyond Carrier Strike Groups (CSG) • Strike Groups and all other deployable Navy units. MAINTENANCE INTEGRATED BASIC SUSTAINMENT CMA CMA DEPLOYED

8. CSG Deployability Then & Now Independent Training Tether Deployment OLD Lost opportunities for rapid employment Work ups Sustainment (Deploy) Phase Sustainment (Deploy) Phase FRP Integrated Training Phase Maintenance Phase Basic Phase

9. FRP Take-aways • FRP is a deliberate process to ensure continuous availability of trained, ready Navy forces capable of a surge response forward on short notice, while meeting forward presence requirements. • Risk in achieving a particular metric is determined by force structure decisions, the utilization rate of assets, and the length of a given Fleet Response Training Plan (FRTP) cycle. • By definition, FRP is always sustainable. • Should indications and warning warrant action, Navy can accelerate training, accelerate maintenance or otherwise modify schedules to meet the emergent Combatant Commander requirements, such as major combat operations. • Steady state is designed to remain within Service budget. The actual surge of forces may incur costs above programmed budget.

10. Current Performance Based Models What does this shift mean to the Models? - Developed & validated 5+ Years Ago • FRP was an embryonic concept • Thrust was to drive OMN discussion away from LOE to specific deliverables The Need to Evolve Much has changed since this original concept Most notably the concept Of FRP A0 & the emergence of 5 Warfighting Enterprises

11. FY10-15 Estimated FRP Ao Summary • FRP AODemand = DO = DP + DS + DHD + DT + DM • NAE FRP Ao Demand = 3 + 3 + 1 • USE FRP Ao Demand = 10 + 15 + 10 • SWE FRP Ao Demand • Changes due to additional forward deployed MCMs (Sasebo) • Does not include AFRICOM standup, additional PCs to Bahrain Current SWE FRP Ao Demand CRUDES = 27 + 25 + 14 Amphibious = 9 + 4 + 21 MCM = 6 + 2 + 4 Patrol Coastal = 5 + 0 + 0 Command Ships = 2 + 0 + 1 Total = 49 + 31 + 40 Projected SWE FRP Ao FY-10 Demand CRUDES = 27 + 25 + 14 Amphibious = 9 + 4 + 21 MCM = 8 + 2 + 4 Patrol Coastal = 5 + 0 + 0 Command Ships = 2 + 0 + 1 Total = 51+ 31 + 40 P = Presence (GFM) S = Surge HD = Homeland Defense T = Training M = Maintenance

12. 27 - 32 months FRP Surface Combatant Model - Example 18 months Employ 63 days 112 days 546 days 90 days Maint Sustainment Basic Integrated Deployed 183 day deploy 14 days SUSTAINMENT Training at sea with CSG • 3 days sea trial • 30 days unit • 10 days ammo 43 days • 29 days COMPTUEX • 14 days JTFEX 43 days MCO Ready MCO Surge Independent Unit Ready for Tasking 63 additional days in support of Fleet ops Sustainment Phase – DeployedSF – 183 Days @ $34SU – 20 days @ $25SO – $80SR – $60SX – $8CT – $10 Sustainment PhaseSF –343 days @ $34SU – x days @ $25SO – $70SR – $60SX – $8CT – $10 Maint PhaseSF – $34SU – $0 SO – $70 SR – $10 SX – $8 CT – $6 Basic PhaseSF – 43 Days @ $34SU – 69 days @ $25SO – $50SR – $40SX – $20CT –$10 Integrated PhaseSF – 43 Days @ $34SU – 47 daysSO – $40SR – $60SX – $10CT – $20 Notional FRP Bin $ Data

13. FRP Ao Expansion Summary • Linkages between FRP Ao & Tier II Metrics made • SWE, USE, NAE progress significant • Using FRP Ao and TFR products as basis for POM-10 • Standardizes model outputs across OPNAV • Improves risk evaluation across Warfare Enterprises • Next Steps • Ship Ops Model require further refinement • R/Y/G rating by elements of cost • Aviation Models • Several updates in process to convert manual data collection to automated process • Ship Maintenance Model • Ship Maintenance Model to Ship Ops Model linkage

14. CONDITION BASED MAINT. ENGINEERED MAINT. PLANS (SYSCOMs) (Fleets) Today’s Maintenance Strategy NCCs Units Ready For Tasking FRP Readiness + Life Cycle Readiness COCOMs Cost Demand Signal Material Readiness Ship Maintenance & Modernization Domain $ Fleet Readiness Enterprise POM/Budget Process MODERNIZATION Inputs (Platform Sponsors/PEOs) Requirements Generation

15. Summary • Fleet Response Plan has increased availability of employable forces • Continues to capitalize on readiness investments • Provides foundation to meet Maritime Strategy • Supports rotational forward presence while providing surge capacity to meet emergent global defense and GWOT requirements • Ao is defined by FRTP cycle length, Class maintenance plan, force structure and operations funding • Manages cost through the Fleet Readiness Enterprise • FRP continuing to evolve

16. Maritime Strategy Closing

17. UNCLASSIFIED Questions